Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: A prospective randomized clinical trial

Progress in Orthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Salehi, Parisa ^a   Najafi, Hooman Zarif ^a   Roeinpeikar, Seyyed Mehdi ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE SPIRAL WIRE RETAINER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; POLYETHYLENE WOVEN RIBBON RETAINER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL TIME; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HELIOSIT; HISTOLOGY; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC WIRE; ORTHODONTICS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH ARCH; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG ADULT;

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTAL MATERIAL; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; RIBBOND;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYETHYLENES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884585366     PISSN: 17237785     EISSN: 21961042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-25     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1981; 80:349-65.
2. Little RM, Riedel RA, Årtun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93:423-28.
3. Uhde MD, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Long-term stability of dental relationships after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1983; 53:240-52.
4. Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106:243-49.
5. Parker WS. Retention-retainers may be forever. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 95:505-13.
6. Durbin DD. Relapse and the need for permanent fixed retention. J Clin Orthod. 2001; 35:723-27.
7. Cerny R. Permanent fixed lingual retention. J Clin Orthod. 2001; 35:728-32.
8. Knelrim RW. Invisible mandibular cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43:218-19.
9. Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod. 1977; 71:440-48.
10. Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982; 15:247-55.
11. Årtun J, Zachrisson BU. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81:269-76.
12. Diamond M. Resin fiberglass bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1987; 21:182-83.
13. Geserick M, Ball J, Wichelhaus A. Bonding fiber-reinforced lingual retainers with color-reactivating flowable composite. J Clin Orthod. 2004; 38:560-62.
14. Pandis N, Vlahopoulos K, Madianos P, Eliades T. Long-term periodontal status of patients with mandibular lingual fixed retention. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(5):471-76.
15. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108:207-13.
16. Orchin JD. Permanent lingual bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1990; 24:229-31.
17. Miller TE, Hakimzadeh F, Rudo DN. Immediate and indirect woven polyethylene ribbon-reinforced periodontal-prosthetic splint: a case report. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26:267-71.
18. Goldberg AJ, Freilich MA. An innovative pre-impregnated glass fiber for reinforcing composites. Dent Clin North Am. 1999; 43:127-33.
19. Karaman AI, Kir N, Belli S. Four applications of reinforced polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121:650-54.
20. Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a directbonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33:579-83.
21. Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25:619-30.
22. Foek DL, Ozcan M, Krebs E, Sandham A. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11:381-90.
23. Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134(179):e1-8.
24. Tacken MP, Cosyn J, Wilde P, De Aerts J, Govaerts E, Vannet BV. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32:117-23.
25. Tanaka E, Ueki K, Kikuzaki M, Yamada E, Takeuchi M, Dalla-Bona D, Tanne K. Longitudinal measurements of tooth mobility during orthodontic treatment using a periotest. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:101-15.
26. Artun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86:112-18.