Longitudinal measurements of tooth mobility during orthodontic treatment using a Periotest

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 101-105

  Tanaka, Eiji ^a   Ueki, Kazuhiro ^b   Kikuzaki, Mayu ^c   Yamada, Eitaro ^b   Takeuchi, Michiru ^c   Dalla Bona, Diego ^a   Tanne, Kazuo ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Ueki Orthodontic Clinic   (Japan)

^c HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Orthodontic treatment; Periotest; Tooth mobility

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; ORTHODONTICS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIOTEST; SCHOOL CHILD; SKELETON MALFORMATION; TOOTH; TOOTH ARCH;

EID: 13244291477     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Reitan K, Rygh P. Biomechanical principles and reactions. In: Graber TH, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics, Current Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1994:96-191.
2. Rygh P. Ultrastructural changes in tension zones of rat molar periodontium incident to orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:269-281.
3. Kyomen S, Tanne K. Influences of aging changes in proliferative rate of PDL cells during experimental tooth movement in rats. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:67-72.
4. Tanne K, Inoue Y, Sakuda M. Biomechanical behavior of the penodontium before and after orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:123-128.
5. Tanne K, Yoshida S, Kawata T, Sasaki A, Knox J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the biomechanical response of the tooth and periodontium to orthodontic forces in adolescent and adult subjects. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:109-115.
6. Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ, Bowley WW. Holographic measurement of tooth mobility in three dimensions. J Periodont Res. 1978;13:283-294.
7. Igarashi N, Ai M. The observation of tooth mobility by a noncontact sensor. J Jpn Prosthod Soc. 1980;24:69-81.
8. Kaneko TM. Relationship between the stiffness of the dental implant-bone system and the duration of the implant-tapping rod contact. Med Eng Phys. 1994;16:310-315.
9. Andresen M, Mackie I, Worthington H. The Periotest in traumatology. Part I. Does it have the properties necessary for use as a clinical device and can the measurements be interpreted? Endod Dent Traumatol. 2003;19:214-217.
10. Mackie I, Ghrebi S, Worthington H. Measurement of tooth mobility in children using the Periotest. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:120-123.
11. Oikarinen K, Kauppinen P, Herrala E. Mobility and percussion sound of healthy upper incisors and canines. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1992;8:21-25.
12. Yoshida S. Association between mechanical properties of the periodontium and the biomechanical responses in adolescence and adult. J Hiroshima Univ Dent Soc. 1996;28:118-132.
13. Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:35-43.
14. Blake M, Woodside DG, Pharoah MJ. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and Speed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:76-84.
15. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000:597-598.
16. Watted N, Wieber M, Teuscher T, Schmitz N. Comparison of incisor mobility after insertion of canine-to-canine lingual retainers bonded to two or six teeth. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:387-396.