A comparison of usability factors of four mobile devices for accessing healthcare information by adolescents

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 356-366

  Sheehan, B ^a   Lee, Y ^a   Rodriguez, M ^a   Tiase, V ^b   Schnall, Rebecca ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Health information; Mobile health (mHealth); Usability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; TELEMEDICINE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; CITIES; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84884491952     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-06-RA-0021     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. mHealth Alliance. Frequently Asked Questions, 2011. 2010 [cited 2011 August 3]; Available from: http://www.mhealthalliance.org/about/frequently-asked-questions.
2. Istepanian R, Laxminarayan S, Pattichis CS, editors. M-health: Emerging mobile health systems. New York, N.Y.: Springer; 2006.
3. Kleinke JD. Dot-gov: market failure and the creation of a national health information technology system. Health Aff (Millwood)2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1246-62.
4. Lenhart A. Teens, cell phones and texting. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2010.
5. Lenhart A. Teens and Mobile Phones Over the Past Five Years: Pew Internet Looks Back. Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2009 [cited 2010 March 28]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Re ports/2009/14--Teens-and-Mobile-Phones-Data-Memo/1-Data-Memo/5-How-teens-use-text-messaging. aspx?r=1.
6. Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social Media and Young Adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project 2010 [cited 2010 March 28]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx.
7. Hachman M. More Kids Using Cell Phones, Study Finds Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2009 [cited 2010 March 28]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Media-Mentions/2009/More-Kids-Using-Cell-Phones-Study-Finds.aspx.
8. Curioso WH, Mechael PN. Enhancing 'M-health' with south-to-south collaborations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010 Feb;29(2):264-7.
9. Lewis J, editor Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: The PSSUQ. Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting; 1992; Boca Raton, Fla.
10. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2006;6:3.
11. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly1995;19(2):213-36.
12. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science2000;46(2):186-204.
13. Tsiknakis M, Kouroubali A. Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int J Med Inform2009 Jan;78(1):39-52.
14. ISO/IEC FCD 25010. Software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-quality models for software product and system quality in use. In: Bevan N, editor. Systems and software engineering2009.
15. Saffah A, editor QUIM: A framework for quantifying usability metrics in software quality models. Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software; 2001; Hong Kong.
16. Bevan N, editor Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. HCI International; 2009; San Diego, Ca.
17. Lewis JR. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Human Coputer Interact1995;7:57-78.
18. Heinonen R, Luoto R, Lindfors P, Nygard CH. Usability and feasibility of mobile phone diaries in an experimental physical exercise study. Telemed J E Health2012 Mar;18(2):115-9.
19. Whittaker R, Borland R, Bullen C, Lin RB, McRobbie H, Rodgers A. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009(4):CD006611.
20. Mulvaney SA, Rothman RL, Dietrich MS, Wallston KA, Grove E, Elasy TA, Johnson KB. Using mobile phones to measure adolescent diabetes adherence. Health Psychol2012 Jan;31(1):43-50.
21. Lee J, Cain C, Young S, Chockley N, Burstin H. The Adoption Gap: Health Information Technology In Small Physician Practices. Health Affairs2005 September 1, 2005;24(5):1364-6.
22. Ramaiah M, Subrahmanian E, Sriram RD, Lide BB. Workflow and electronic health records in small medical practices. Perspect Health Inf Manag2012;9:1d.
23. Honekamp W, Ostermann H. Evaluation of a prototype health information system using the FITT framework. Inform Prim Care2011;19(1):47-9.
24. Schnall R, Smith AB, Sikka M, Gordon P, Camhi E, Kanter T, Bakken S. Employing the FITT framework to explore HIV case managers' perceptions of two electronic clinical data (ECD) summary systems. Int J Med Inform2012 Jul 27.
25. Faulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput2003 Aug;35(3):379-83.