Employing the FITT framework to explore HIV case managers' perceptions of two electronic clinical data (ECD) summary systems

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Schnall, Rebecca ^a   Smith, Ann B ^b   Sikka, Manik ^b   Gordon, Peter ^c   Camhi, Eli ^d   Kanter, Timothy ^b   Bakken, Suzanne ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b BRONX LEBANON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^c New York Presbyterian System Select Health ^*  (United States)

^d NewYork Presbyterian System Select Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuity of care; Continuity of care document; Continuity of care record; Electronic clinical data summary; FITT framework; HIV AIDS

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DATA; CONTINUITY OF CARE; CONTINUITY OF CARE DOCUMENT; CONTINUITY OF CARE RECORDS; FITT FRAMEWORK; HIV/AIDS;

HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGERS;

MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CASE MANAGEMENT; CASE MANAGER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; ELECTRONIC CLINICAL DATA; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FIT BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL, TASK AND TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

CASE MANAGEMENT; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NEW YORK CITY;

EID: 84866166781     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Indyk D., Belville R., Lachapelle S., Gordon G., Dewart T. A community-based approach to HIV case management: systematizing the unmanageable. Soc. Work 1993, 38(4):380-387.
2. Rodriguez H.P., Marsden P.V., Landon B.E., Wilson I.B., Cleary P.D. The effect of care team composition on the quality of HIV care. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2008, 65(1):88-113.
3. Hecht F.M., Wilson I.B., Wu A.W., Cook R.L., Turner B.J. Optimizing care for persons with HIV infection. Society of General Internal Medicine AIDS Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 131(2):136-143.
4. Wright J., Henry S.B., Holzemer W.L., Falknor P. Evaluation of community-based nurse case management activities for symptomatic HIV/AIDS clients. J. Assoc. Nurses AIDS Care 1993, 4(2):37-47.
5. Institute of Medicine, Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care, Washington, DC, 2003 Contract No.: Document Number|.
6. Ammenwerth E., Iller C., Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2006, 6:3. PMCID: 1352353.
7. Kibbe D.C., Phillips R.L., Green L.A. The continuity of care record. Am. Fam. Physician 2004, 70(7). 1220, 2-3.
8. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms: Department of Health and Human Services, 2008 Contract No.: Document Number|.
9. Johnson T.R., Tang X., Graham M.J., Brixey J., Turley J.P., Zhang J., et al. Attitudes toward medical device use errors and the prevention of adverse events. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2007, 33(11):689-694.
10. Norman D.A. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction 1986, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Adler-Milstein J., Bates D.W., Jha A.K. A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011, 154(10):666-671.
12. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology The Nationwide Health Information Network, Direct Project, and CONNECT Software 2011, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&mode=2&objID=3340 [updated 2011; cited 11.06.12].
13. Health Level Seven International, HL7 Standards - Section 4: EHR Profiles. Ann Arbor, MI. Available from: 2012 [updated 2012; cited 29.02.12]. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_section.cfm%3Fsection=4.
14. Arzt N.H. Clinical summaries and meaningful use. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 2011, 25(1):62-69.
15. Cesta A., Bajcar J.M., Ong S.W., Fernandes O.A. The EMITT study: development and evaluation of a medication information transfer tool. Ann. Pharmacother. 2006, 40(6):1074-1081.
16. Siika A.M., Rotich J.K., Simiyu C.J., Kigotho E.M., Smith F.E., Sidle J.E., et al. An electronic medical record system for ambulatory care of HIV-infected patients in Kenya. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005, 74(5):345-355.
17. Grossberg R., Gross R. Use of pharmacy refill data as a measure of antiretroviral adherence. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007, 4(4):187-191.
18. HIMSS, Electronic Health Record, Chicago, IL. Available from: 2012 [updated 2012; cited 29.02.12]. http://www.himss.org/ASP/topics_ehr.asp.
19. ASTM WK4363 Draft Standard Specification for the Continuity of Care Record, Version 1 2004, ASTM International.
20. ASTM E31.28 E- Standard Specification for Continuity of Care Record (CCR) 2005, ASTM International.
21. Jerant A.F., Hill D.B. Does the use of electronic medical records improve surrogate patient outcomes in outpatient settings?. J. Fam. Pract. 2000, 49(4):349-357.
22. Tsiknakis M., Kouroubali A. Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(1):39-52.
23. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001, 64(2-3):143-156.
24. May C., Ellis N.T. When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic. Soc. Sci. Med. 2001, 53(8):989-1002.
25. Honekamp W., Ostermann H. Evaluation of a prototype health information system using the FITT framework. Inform. Prim. Care 2011, 19(1):47-49.
26. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1993, 38(3):475-487.
27. DeLone W., McLean E. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Syst. Res. 1992, 3(1):60-95.
28. Dixon D.R. The behavioral side of information technology. Int. J. Med. Inform. 1999, 56(1-3):117-123.
29. Goodhue D.L., Klein B.D., March S.T. User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Inform. Manage. 2000, 38(2):87-101.
30. Green L.W., Kreuter M.W. Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach 2005, McGraw Hill, Boston. 4th ed.
31. Graneheim U.H., Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ. Today 2004, 24(2):105-112.
32. Yasunaga H., Imamura T., Yamaki S., Endo H. Computerizing medical records in Japan. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(10):708-713.
33. Likourezos A., Chalfin D.B., Murphy D.G., Sommer B., Darcy K., Davidson S.J. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. J. Emerg. Med. 2004, 27(4):419-424.
34. Randeree E. Exploring physician adoption of EMRs: a multi-case analysis. J. Med. Syst. 2007, 31(6):489-496.
35. Lesselroth B.J., Yang J., McConnachie J., Brenk T., Winterbottom L. Addressing the sociotechnical drivers of quality improvement: a case study of post-operative DVT prophylaxis computerised decision support. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2011, 20(5):381-389. PMCID:3088464.
36. McGinn C.A., Grenier S., Duplantie J., Shaw N., Sicotte C., Mathieu L., et al. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011, 9(46). PMCID:3103434.
37. Chau P.Y.K., Hu P.J.-H. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inform. Manage. 2002, 39(4):297-311.
38. Davis F., Bagozzi R., Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 1989, 35(8):982-1003.