Linear regression metamodeling as a tool to Summarize and present simulation model results

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 880-890

  Jalal, Hawre ^a   Dowd, Bryan ^a   Sainfort, François ^a   Kuntz, Karen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; decision analysis; design of experiments; economic evaluation; metamodel; regression; sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION ANALYSIS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HUMAN; METAMODEL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; NEOPLASMS;

COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION ANALYSIS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; METAMODEL; REGRESSION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84884477817     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13492014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, et al Cambridge. (UK): Cambridge University Press ; 2001 :
2. Pauker S, Kassirer J. The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980 ; 302: 1109-17
3. Doubilet P, Begg CB, Weinstein MC, Braun P, McNeil BJ. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation: a practical approach. Med Decis Making. 1985 ; 5: 157-77
4. Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M Cambridge. (UK): Cambridge University Press; ; 1996 :
5. Coyle D, Oakley J. Estimating the expected value of partial perfect information: a review of methods. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 ; 9: 251-9
6. Briggs A, Fenwick E, Karnon J, Paltiel AD, Sculpher M, Weinstein M. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-6. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32: 722-32
7. Blanning RW. The sources and uses of sensitivity information. Interfaces. 1974 ; 4: 32-8
8. Kleijnen JPC. A comment on Blanning's "Metamodel for sensitivity analysis: The regression metamodel in simulation.". Interfaces. 1975 ; 5: 21-3
9. Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 1998 ; 18: S68-80
10. Kleijnen JPC. An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2005 ; 164: 287-300
11. Duintjer Tebbens RJ, Thompson KM, Hunink MGM, et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a dynamic economic evaluation model for vaccination programs. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 28: 182-200
12. Friedman LW, Pressman I. The metamodel in simulation analysis: can it be trusted?. J Oper Res Soc. 1988 ; 39: 939-48
13. Kleijnen JPC New York: Springer Science+Business Media ; 2008 :
14. Merz JF, Small MJ. Measuring decision sensitivity: a combined Monte Carlo-logistic regression approach. Med Decis Making. 1992 ; 12: 189-96
15. Tappenden P, Eggington S, Oakley J, Mccabe C. Methods for expected value of information analysis in complex health economic models: developments on the health economics of interferon-β and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis. Health Technol Assess. 2004 ; 8: 1-78
16. Stevenson MD, Oakley J, Chilcott JB. Gaussian process modeling in conjunction with individual patient simulation modeling: a case study describing the calculation of cost-effectiveness ratios for the treatment of established osteoporosis. Med Decis Making. 2004 ; 24: 89-100
17. Coyle D, Buxton MJ, O'Brien BJ. Measures of importance for economic analysis based on decision modeling. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 ; 56: 989-97
18. Friedman LW, Friedman HH. Validating the simulation metamodel: some practical approaches. Simulation. 1985 ; 45: 144-6
19. Kleijnen JPC, Sargent RG. A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. Eur J Oper Res. 1997 ; 120: 14-29