Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force working group-6

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 722-732

  Briggs, Andrew H ^a   Weinstein, Milton C ^b   Fenwick, Elisabeth A L ^a   Karnon, Jonathan ^c   Sculpher, Mark J ^d   Paltiel, A David ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

guidelines; heterogeneity; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty analysi (ADP) s; value of information

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

DECISION MAKING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84868151670     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12458348     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, Kuntz KM. Modeling good research practices-overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 667-677
2. Roberts M, Russell LB, Paltiel AD, Chambers M, McEwan P, Krahn M. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 678-689
3. Siebert U, Alagoz O, Bayoumi AM, et al. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 690-700
4. Karnon J, Stahl J, Brennan A, Caro JJ, Mar J, Möller J. Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 701-711
5. Pitman R, Fisman D, Zaric GS, et al. Dynamic transmission modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-5. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 712-721
6. Eddy DM, Hollingworth W, Caro JJ, Tsevat J, McDonald KM, Wong JB. Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7. Med Decis Making. 2012 ; 32 (5). 733-743
7. Claxton K. Exploring uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008 ; 26: 781-98
8. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Buxton MJ. Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: the role of sensitivity analysis. Health Econ. 1994 ; 3: 95-104
9. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press ; 2007 :
10. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ. Impact of model, methodological, and parameter uncertainty in the economic analysis of vaccination programs. Med Decis Making. 2006 ; 26: 434-46
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2008.Available from: URL: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2012.
12. Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002 ; 21: 2313-24
13. Everitt BS The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press ; 1998 :
14. Briggs AH, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; 2006 :
15. O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, et al Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Expert Probabilities. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; ; 2006 :
16. Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med. 2009 ; 28: 3049-67
17. Ades AE, Cliffe S. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of a multiparameter decision model: consistency of evidence and the accurate assessment of uncertainty. Med Decis Making. 2002 ; 22: 359-71
18. Karnon J, Czoski Murray C, Smith KJ, Brand C. A hybrid cohort individual sampling natural history model of age-related macular degeneration: assessing the cost-effectiveness of screening using probabilistic calibration. Med Decis Making. 2009 ; 29: 304-16
19. Karnon J, Vanni T. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness-of-fit, parameter search strategies, and convergence criteria. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 ; 29: 51-62
20. Kim JJ, Kuntz KM, Stout NK, et al. Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 ; 166: 137-50
21. Taylor DCA, Pawar V, Kruzikas DT, et al. Incorporating calibrated model parameters into sensitivity analyses deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 ; 30: 119-26
22. Vanni T, Karnon J, Madan J, et al. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a seven step approach. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 ; 29: 35-49
23. Bojke L, Claxton K, Sculpher M, Palmer S. Characterizing structural uncertainty in decision analytic models: a review and application of methods. Value Health. 2009 ; 12: 739-49
24. Chapman CH, Thompson SG, Sharples LD. Accounting for uncertainty in health economic decision models by using model averaging. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 ; 172 (2). 383-404
25. Jackson CH, Bojke L, Thompson SG, et al. A framework for addressing structural uncertainty in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2011 ; 31: 662-74
26. Briggs A, Fenn P. Confidence intervals or surfaces? Uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness plane. Health Econ. 1998 ; 7: 723-40
27. Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. The negative side of cost-effectiveness analysis (letter). JAMA. 1997 ; 277: 1931-2
28. Claxton K, Sculpher M, Drummond M. A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet. 2002 ; 360: 711-15
29. Brennan A, Kharroubi S, O'Hagan A, et al. Calculating partial expected value of perfect information via Monte Carlo sampling algorithms. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 448-70
30. Groot KoerkampB, Hunink MG, Stijnen T, Weinstein MC. Identifying key parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis using value of information: a comparison of methods. Health Econ. 2006 ; 4: 383-92
31. Ades AE, Lu G, Claxton K. Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling. Med Decis Making. 2004 ; 24: 207-27