Comparison of on-road emissions for hybrid and regular transit buses

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1212-1220

  Hallmark, Shauna L ^a,b   Wang, Bo ^a,b   Sperry, Robert ^b  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT; BUSES; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; COST REDUCTION; EMISSION CONTROL; FLEET OPERATIONS; FUEL ECONOMY; NITROGEN OXIDES; OPERATING COSTS; PURCHASING; ROADS AND STREETS;

EMISSION REDUCTION; HYBRID ELECTRIC BUS; HYDROCARBON EMISSION; NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS; PORTABLE EMISSIONS MONITORING; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; VEHICLE OPERATIONS; VEHICLE SPECIFIC POWER;

HYBRID VEHICLES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; FUEL; HYDROCARBON; NITROGEN OXIDE;

ACCELERATION; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL TRANSIT BUS; COST CONTROL; EXHAUST GAS; HUMAN; HYBRID TRANSIT BUS; LABORATORY TEST; MOTOR VEHICLE; POLLUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; VELOCITY;

EID: 84884471465     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.813874     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Battelle. 2002. Technical Assessment of Advanced Transit Bus Propulsion Systems, Columbus, OH: Battelle. For the Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, Texas.
2. Chandler, K., and, K. and Walkowicz. 2006. King County Metro Transit Hybrid Articulated Buses: Final Evaluation Report,. NREL/TP-540-40585.: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
3. Chandler, K., Walkowicz, K. and Eudy, L. 2002. New York City Transit Diesel Hybrid-Electric Buses: Final Results. DOE/NREL Transit Bus Evaluation Project National Renewable Energy Laboratory
4. Choi, H. and Frey, H.C. 2010. Method for in-use measurement and evaluation of the activity, fuel use, electricity use, and emissions of a plug-in hybrid diesel-electric school bus. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44: 3601 - 3607. doi: 10.1021/es903330k
5. Clark, N., Borrell, N., Enrique, R., McKain, D.L., Paramo, V., Hugo, W., Vergara, W., Barnett, R.A., Gautam, M., Thompson, G., Lyons, D.W. and Schipper, L. 2006. Evaluation of emissions from new and in-use transit buses in Mexico City, Mexico. J. Transport. Res. Rec., 1987: 42 - 53. doi: 10.3141/1987-05
6. Clean Air Technologies International, Inc. 2007. OEM-2100 Montana System: Operation Manual. Version 2.1, Buffalo, NY: Global MRV.
7. CyRide. 2012. Statistics(accessed September, 2012 http://www.cyride.com/index.aspx?page=1240
8. Ensfield, C. 2002. On-Road Emissions Testing of 18 Tier 1 Passenger Cars and 17 Diesel Powered Public Transport Busses, EPA420-R-02-030.: Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
9. Frey, H.C., Kim, K., Rasdorf, W., Pang, S. and Lewis, P. 2008. " Characterization of real-world activity, fuel use, and emissions for selected motor graders fueled with petroleum diesel and B20 biodiesel ". In Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Conference of the Air & Waste Management Association, Portland, OR: June, 2008.
10. Frey, H.C. and Rouphail, N.M. 2003. Operational Evaluation of Emissions and Fuel Use of B20 versus Diesel Vehicles, North Carolina State University.
11. Frey, H.C., Rouphail, N., Unal, A. and Colyer, J. 2001. Emissions Reductions Through Better Traffic Management: An Empirical Evaluation Based Upon On-Road Measurements, Center for Transportation and the Environment/North Carolina Department of Transportation (CTE/NCDOT): North Carolina State University.
12. Frey, H.C., Rouphail, N.M., Zhai, H., Farias, T.L. and Goncalves, C.A. 2007. Comparing real-world fuel consumption for diesel and hydrogen-fueled transit buses and implications for emissions. Transport. Res. D, 12: 281 - 291. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2007.03.003
13. Hallmark, S., Wang, B., Qiu, Y. and Sperry, R. 2012. Evaluation of in-use fuel economy and on-board emissions for hybrid and regular CyRide transit buses. Ames, IA: Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University,
14. 3 emissions from light-duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol, 39: 9595 - 9600. doi: 10.1021/es050120c
15. Jackson, E. and Holmen Britt, B. 2009. Modal analysis of vehicle operation and particulate emissions from Connecticut transit buses. Transport. Res. Rec., 2123: 76 - 87. doi: 10.3141/2123-09
16. O'Keefe, M.P. and Vertin, K. 2002. An Analysis of Hybrid Electric Propulsion Systems for Transit Buses, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/MP-540-32858.
17. Saeed, A.L., Frey, H.C., Kim, K., Rasdorf, W., Lewis, P. and Pang, S. 2009. Real-world in-use activity, fuel use, and emissions for non-road construction vehicles: A case study for excavators. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc, 58: 1033 - 1046. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.8.1033
18. Shorter, J.H., Herndon, S., Zahniser, M.S., Nelson, D.D., Wormhoudt, J., Demerjian, K.L. and Kolb, C. E. 2005. Real-time measurements of nitrogen oxide emissions from in-use New York City transit buses using a chase vehicle. Environ. Sci. Technol, 39: 7991 - 8000. doi: 10.1021/es048295u
19. Wayne, W.S., Clark, N.N., Nine, R.D. and Elefante, D. 2004. A comparison of emissions and fuel economy from hybrid-electric and conventional-drive transit buses. Energy Fuels, 18: 257 - 270. doi: 10.1021/ef030096t
20. Wayne, W.S., Sandoval, J.A. and Clark, N.N. 2009. Emission benefits from alternative fuels and advanced technology in the US transit bus fleet. Energy Environ., 20: 497 - 515. doi: 10.1260/095830509788707374
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. November. 2010. MOVES2010 Highway Vehicle: Population and Activity Data, EPA420-R-10-026: U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.
22. Zhai, H., Frey, H.C. and Rouphail, N. M. 2008. A vehicle-specific power approach to speed- and facility-specific emissions for diesel transit buses. Environ. Sci. Technol, 42: 7985 - 7991. doi: 10.1021/es800208d