Plans to obtain a mammogram among Chilean women: The roles of recommendations and self-efficacy

Health Education Research

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 784-792

  Molina, Yamile ^a,b   Martínez Gutiérrez, Javiera ^a,c   Püschel, Klaus ^c   Thompson, Beti ^a,d  

^a USA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BREAST TUMOR; CHILE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHILE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 84884469218     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyt047     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lozano-Ascencio R, Gomez-Dantes H, Lewis S et al. Breast cancer trends in Latin America and the Caribbean. Salud Publica Mex 2009; 51(Suppl. 2): s147-56.
2. Garcia M, Jemal A,WardEMet al. Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2007.
3. AndersonBO, CaleffiM. Situación de la salud mamarai en el mundo y en Latinoamérica en particular. Revista Méd Cl?́n Las Condes 2006; 17: 137-41.
4. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancerbase No. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Accessed: 7 September 2012.
5. Serra I, Martinez R, Mimica X et al. Breast cancer in Chile: analysis of 1,485 women treated for breast cancer in two public hospitals. Rev Chilena de Cirug?́a 2009; 61: 507-14.
6. Donoso E, Cuello M. Cancer mortality among Chilean women 1997-2003. Rev Chil ObstetGinecol 2006; 71: 10-6.
7. Ministerio de Salud (MINISAL). Programa Nacional de Cancer de Mama. Seminario Internacional de Cancer de Mama. Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.
8. Puschel K, Thompson B. Mammogram screening in Chile: using mixed methods to implement health policy planning at the primary care level. Breast 2011; 20: S40-5.
9. Puschel K, Coronado G, Soto G et al. Strategies for increasing mammography screening in primary care in Chile: results of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 2254-61.
10. Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 62-7. (Pubitemid 24023513)
11. Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML et al. Which women aren?t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: 61-70. (Pubitemid 46020902)
12. Hawley ST, Earp JA,O?MalleyMet al. The role of physician recommendation in women?s mammography use: is it a 2-stage process? Med Care 2000; 38: 392-403.
13. Austin LTT,Ahmad F,McNally MJ et al. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: a literature review using the health belief model. Womens Health Issues 2002; 22: 351-8.
14. Fernández ME, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G et al. Using intervention mapping to develop a breast and cervical cancer screening program for Hispanic farmworkers: Cultivando La Salud. Health Promot Pract 2005; 6: 394-404.
15. González P, Borrayo EA. Role of physician involvement on Latinas? mammography screening adherence. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21: 165-70.
16. Jandorf L, Ellison J, Villagra C et al. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among low income immigrant Hispanics. J Immigr Minor Health 2010; 12: 462-9.
17. Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Sorensen G. Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices? Health Educ Behav 2008; 35: 763-76.
18. Suarez L. Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 742-46. (Pubitemid 24237350)
19. Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R et al. Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19: 47-52. (Pubitemid 30364997)
20. Garbers S, Chiasson MA. Patterns of agreement on breast cancer screening knowledge and practices among women in Dominican and Mexican families in NewYork City. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10: CR628-34. (Pubitemid 39546038)
21. Fernandez ME, Palmer RC, Leong-WU CA. Repeat mammography screening among low-income and minority women: a qualitative study. Cancer Control 2005; 12S: 77-83.
22. Luquis RR, Cruz IJV. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about breast cancer and breast cancer screening among Hispanic women residing in south central Pennsylvania. J Comm Health 2006; 31: 25-42. (Pubitemid 43042752)
23. Marin G, Marin BV. Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
24. Santiago-Rivera AL, Arrendo P, Gallardo-Cooper M. Counseling Latinos and la familia: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
25. Andrés-Hyman RC, Ortiz J, An?es LM et al. Culture and clinical practice: recommendations for working with Puerto Ricans and other Latinas(os) in the United States. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2006; 37: 694-701. (Pubitemid 44950875)
26. Caudle P. Providing culturally sensitive healthcare to Hispanic clients. Nurse Pract 1993; 18: 40-51.
27. Graham S,Weiner B. Theories and principles of motivation. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC (eds). Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996, 63-84.
28. BurkeNJ, Bird JA, ClarkMAet al. Social and cultural meanings of self-efficacy. Health Educ Behav 2009; 36S: 111S-28S.
29. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm Monogr 2009; 76: 408-20.
30. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Met 2008; 40: 87-91.
31. FritzMS, MacKinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci 2007; 18: 233-9.
32. Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivar Behav Res 2010; 45: 627-60.
33. Sobel ME. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociol Met Res 1987; 16: 155-76.
34. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Met 2002; 7: 83.
35. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Met 2002; 7: 142-77.
36. Sheppard VB, Figueiredo M, Can?ar J et al. Latina a LatinaSM: developing a breast cancer decision support intervention. Psycho-Oncology 2008; 17: 383-91. (Pubitemid 351513687)
37. Calzada E, Fernandez Y, Cortes DE. Incorporating the cultural value of respeto into a framework of Latino parenting. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2010; 16: 77-86.
38. Robles SC, Galanis E. Breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002; 11: 178-85. (Pubitemid 34450392)