Public Good and Private Interest in Educational Evaluation

Handbook of Social Justice in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 5-14

  Mathison, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884466068     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203887745-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Aiken, W. M. (1942). The story of the Eight Year Study. New York: Harper Brothers. Retrieved February 13, 2007, from http://www.8yearstudy.org
2. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
3. Eisner, E. W. (1979). The use of qualitative forms of evaluation for improving educational practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(6), 11-19.
4. Herrnstein, R., and Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
5. House, E. R. (1988). The politics of charisma: The rise and fall of PUSH/Excel Program. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6. House, E. R., Glass, G. V., McLean, L. D., and Walker, D. C. (1978). No simple answer: A critique of the follow-through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 128-160.
7. Jaeger, R. M. (1978). The effect of test selection of Title I project impact. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto.
8. Keppel, F. (1966). The necessary revolution in American education. New York: Harper and Row.
9. King, J. A. (2005). A proposal to build evaluation capacity at the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Partnership Academy. In M. C. Alkin and C. A. Christie (Eds.), New directions for evaluation, 106, 85-98.
10. Lincoln, Y., and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Linn, R. L. (2005). Conflicting demands of No Child Left Behind and state systems: Mixed messages about school performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(33). Retrieved February 13, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n33
12. Mathison, S. (in press). Serving the public interest through educational evaluation: Salvaging democracy by rejecting neo-liberalism. In C. B. Cousins and K. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of educational evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Mathison, S., and Freeman, M. (2003). Constraining the work of elementary teachers: Dilemmas and paradoxes created by state mandated testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(34). Retrieved February 13, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n34
14. Mathison, S., and Muñoz, M. (2004). Evaluating education and schools for democracy. In S. Mathison and E. W. Ross (Eds.), Defending public schools: The nature and limits of standards based educational reform and testing (pp. 71-81). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15. Nation at Risk. (1983). http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
16. Popham, J. (2004). Standards based education: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In S. Mathison and E. W. Ross (Eds.), Defending public schools: The nature and limits of standards based educational reform and testing (pp. 1-26). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17. Smith, E. R., and Tyler, R. W. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper.
18. Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7), 523-540.
19. Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Retrieved February 12, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/index.html
21. Wiley, D. (1979). Evaluation by aggregation: Social and methodological biases. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(2), 41-45.