Goodness-of-Fit Measures for Latent Variable Models for Binary Data

Handbook of Latent Variable and Related Models

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 135-161

  Mavridis, Dimitris ^a   Moustaki, I ^a   Knott, Martin ^b  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956059138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452044-9/50010-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis 1990, Wiley, New York.
2. Bartholomew D.J., Knott M. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. Kendall Library of Statistics 1999, vol. 7. Arnold, London. second ed.
3. p contingency tables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2002, 55:1-15.
4. Bartholomew D.J., Tzamourani P. The goodness-of-fit of latent trait models in attitude measurement. Sociological Methods and Research 1999, 27:525-546.
5. Birch M. A new proof of the Pearson-Fischer theorem. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1964, 35:818-824.
6. Bishop Y.M., Fienberg S., Holland P. Discrete Multivariate Analysis 1975, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Bock R.D., Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 1981, 46(4):443-459.
8. p tables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2004.
9. Christoffersson A. Factor analysis of dichot omized variables. Psychometrika 1975, 40(1):5-31.
10. 2 tests. Biometrics 1954, 10:417-451.
11. Carmer H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics 1946, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
12. Cressie N., Read T. Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1984, 46(3):440-464.
13. Duncan O.D. Indicators of sex typing: Traditional and egalitarian, situational and ideological responses. American Journal of Sociology 1979, 85:251-260.
14. Dunson D.B. Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2000, 62:355-366.
15. Hosmer D., Lemeshow S. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics A 1980, 10:1043-1069.
16. Kendall M.G. The Advanced Theory of Statistics 1952, Griffin, London.
17. Koehler K., Larntz K. An empirical investigation of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1980, 75:336-344.
18. Langeheine R., Pannekoek J., van de Pol F. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 1996, 24(4):492-516.
19. n contingency tables A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2005, (6):1009-1020.
20. Morris C. Central limit theorems for multinomial sums. Annals of Statistics 1975, 3:365-384.
21. Muthén B. Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika 1978, 43(4):551-560.
22. Patz R.J., Junker B.W. A straightforw ard approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 1999, 24:146-178.
23. Rabe-Hesketh S., Pickles A., Skrondal A. GLLAMM: Stata program to fit generalised linear latent and mixed models. Manual Technical Report 2001, Department of Biostatistics and Computing.
24. Rao C.R. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications 1973, John Wiley & Sons, New York. third ed.
25. Reiser M. Analysis of residuals for the multinomial item response model. Psychometrika 1996, 61:509-528.
26. Reiser M. A comparison of full and limited-information methods for testing goodness of fit with applications to latent structure models. Technical report 2004, Arizona State University.
27. Reiser M., VandenBerg M. Validity of the chi-square test in dichotomous variable factor analysis when expected frequencies are small. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1994, 47:85-107.
28. Simonoff J. An improved goodness-of-fit statistic for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1985, 80(391):671-677.
29. Tate M.W., Hyer L. Inaccuracy of the chi-squared test of goodness of fit when expected frequencies are small. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1973, 68:836-841.
30. Tollenaar N., Mooijaart A. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: Full and limited information. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2003, 56:271-288.
31. Von Davier M. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse categorical data: Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Methods of Psychological Research Online 1997, 2(2).