Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: Is there a difference?

Neurosurgical Focus

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Cheng, Jason S ^a   Park, Priscilla ^a   Le, Hai ^a   Reisner, Lori ^a   Chou, Dean ^a   Mummaneni, Praveen V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive; MITLIF; Spinal disorders; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPLICATION; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROCEDURES; SPINAL DISEASES;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHINE; PAIN; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84884401900     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10920684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS1377     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:479-484, 2011
2. Anand N, Hamilton JF, Perri B, Miraliakbar H, Goldstein T: Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31: E748-E753, 2006
3. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 9: 560-565, 2008
4. Essving P, Axelsson K, Kjellberg J, Wallgren O, Gupta A, Lundin A: Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80: 213-219, 2009
5. Habib A, Smith ZA, Lawton CD, Fessler RG: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a perspective on current evidence and clinical knowledge. Minim Invasive Surg 2012: 657342, 2012
6. Hebl JR, Dilger JA, Byer DE, Kopp SL, Stevens SR, Pagnano MW, et al: A pre-emptive multimodal pathway featuring peripheral nerve block improves perioperative outcomes after major orthopedic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33: 510-517, 2008
7. Helfand D: Hospital stays cost more in Northern California than Southern California. Los Angeles Times. March 6, 2011 (http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/06/business/la-fi-hospital-cost-20110306) [Accessed May 31, 2013]
8. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA: Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26: 567-571, 2001
9. Mehta VA, McGirt MJ, Garcés Ambrossi GL, Parker SL, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, et al: Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity. Neurol Res 33: 38-42, 2011
10. Moskowitz A: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 33: 359-366, 2002
11. Mummaneni PV: Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 62: E1384, 2008 (Letter)
12. Park P, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2): E16, 2008
13. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ: Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years. World Neurosurg 78: 178-184, 2012
14. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Shau DN, Zuckerman SL, Godil SS, Cheng JS, et al: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg [epub ahead of print], 2013
15. Pashikanti L, Von Ah D: Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical-surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec 26: 87-94, 2012
16. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB: Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: 1385-1389, 2009
17. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48: 569-575, 2001
18. Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, LaMarca F, Liu JC, Ondra SL: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 54: 368-374, 2004
19. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33: 1683-1688, 2009
20. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 (Suppl): S1-S6, 2005
21. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35: 1615-1620, 2010
22. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ: Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19: 92-97, 2006
23. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 1: 12, 2010
24. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19: 1780-1784, 2010