Stylebased architectural analysis for migrating a webbased regional trade information system

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 193, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Giesecke, Simon ^a   Bornhold, Johannes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

ArchiMate; Architectural Description Languages; Architectural Style; Cocoon; Enterprise Application Integration; Java; Web Migration; xADL

Indexed keywords

ARCHIMATE; ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; ARCHITECTURAL STYLE; COCOON; ENTERPRISE APPLICATION INTEGRATION; JAVA; WEB MIGRATION; XADL;

ARCHITECTURE; COMMERCE; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; REENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; WEBSITES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84884369102     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Apache Foundation. Apache Cocoon. http://cocoon.apache.org/, 2006.
2. F. P. M. Biemans, M. M. Lankhorst, W. B. Teeuw, and R. G. van de Wetering. Dealing with the complexity of business systems architecting. Systems Engineering, 4(2):118-133, 2001.
3. F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, and M. Stal. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
4. E. Dashofy, D. Garlan, A. van der Hoek, and B. Schmerl. xArch, 2006. http://www.isr.uci.edu/architecture/xarch/.
5. E. M. Dashofy, A. van der Hoek, and R. N. Taylor. A comprehensive approach for the development of modular software architecture description languages. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 14(2):199-245, 2005.
6. E. Di Nitto and D. Rosenblum. Exploiting ADLs to specify architectural styles induced by middleware infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, pages 13-22. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999.
7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1995.
8. D. Garlan, S.-W. Cheng, and A. J. Kompanek. Reconciling the needs of architectural description with object-modeling notations. Sci. Comput. Program., 44(1):23-49, 2002.
9. C. Ghezzi, M. Jazayeri, and D. Mandrioli. Fundamentals of Software Engineering. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002.
10. S. Giesecke. A method for integrating enterprise information systems based on middleware styles. In International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS'06) Doctoral Symposium, 2006. Accepted for publication.
11. W. Hasselbring. Information system integration. Commun. ACM, 43(6):32-38, 2000.
12. M. N. Huhns and M. P. Singh. Service-oriented computing: Key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(1):75-81, 2005.
13. JBoss Labs. Hibernate, 2006. http://www.hibernate.org/.
14. H. Jonkers, M. M. Lankhorst, R. van Buuren, S. Hoppenbrouwers, M. M. Bonsangue, and L. W. N. van der Torre. Concepts for modeling enterprise architectures. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst., 13(3):257-287, 2004.
15. M. Kazakov and H. Abdulrab. Semi-automated software integration: An approach based on logical inference. In 3rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), pages 527-530, 2004.
16. R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. Atam: A method for architecture evaluation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000.
17. I. Kruger and R. Mathew. Systematic development and exploration of service-oriented software architectures. In WICSA '04: Proceedings of the Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'04), pages 177-187. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2004.
18. R. Land and I. Crnkovic. Software systems integration and architectural analysis-a case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, pages 338-. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
19. M. Lankhorst et al. Enterprise architecture at work. Springer, 2005.
20. C. M. MacKenzie et al. Reference model for service oriented architecture 1.0. Public Review Draft wd-soa-rm-cd1, OASIS SOA Reference Model TC, Feb. 2006. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16628/wd-soa-rm-pr1.p%df.
21. N. Medvidovic, D. S. Rosenblum, D. F. Redmiles, and J. E. Robbins. Modeling software architectures in the unified modeling language. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 11(1):2-57, 2002.
22. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 26(1):70-93, 2000.
23. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software architecture: perspectives on an emerging discipline. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.
24. Sun Microsystems. Java Server Pages Technology. http://java.sun.com/ products/jsp/, 2006.
25. W. B. Teeuw and H. van den Berg. On the quality of conceptual models. In S. W. Liddle, editor, Proc. ER'97 Workshop on Behavioral Models and Design Transformations, 1997.
26. University of California at Irvine. xADL 2.0-A highly extensible architecture description language for software and systems. http://www.isr.uci. edu/projects/xarchuci/index.html.
27. R. van Solingen and E. Berghout. The goal/question/metric method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development. McGraw-Hill, 1999.
28. World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible markup language (XML), 2006. http://www.w3.org/XML/.
29. O. Zimmermann, M. R. Tomlinson, and S. Peuser. Perspectives on Web Services. Springer, 2005.