Subacute ruminal acidosis and total mixed ration preference in lactating dairy cows1

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 6610-6620

  Maulfair, D D ^a   McIntyre, K K ^a   Heinrichs, A J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acidosis; Diet selection; Particle size; Sorting

Indexed keywords

BOS;

STARCH; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ACIDOSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BOVINAE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; LACTATION; METABOLISM; PARTICLE SIZE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; RUMINANT STOMACH; VETERINARY;

ACIDOSIS; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTATION; PARTICLE SIZE; RUMEN; STARCH;

EID: 84884351715     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6771     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Official Methods of Analysis 2000, AOAC International, AOAC International, Arlington, VA. 17th.
2. ASABE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers). 2007. Method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage materials by screening. ANSI/ASAE S424.1:663-665. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI.
3. Britton R.A., Stock R.A. Acidosis, rate of starch digestion and intake. Symposium Proceedings: Feed Intake by Beef Cattle. F. N. Owens, ed. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station MP-121 1987, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Pages 125-137.
4. Castle M.E., Retter W.C., Watson J.N. Silage and milk production: Comparisons between grass silage of three different chop lengths. Grass Forage Sci 1979, 34:293-301.
5. DeVries T.J., Dohme F., Beauchemin K.A. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Feed sorting. J. Dairy Sci 2008, 91:3958-3967.
6. Dohme F., DeVries T.J., Beauchemin K.A. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Ruminal pH. J. Dairy Sci 2008, 91:3554-3567.
7. Huntington G.B. Nutritional problems related to the gastro-intestinal tract. The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition 1993, 474-480. Waveland Press Inc., Long Grove, IL. D.C. Church (Ed.).
8. Kenward M.G., Roger J.H. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 1997, 53:983-997.
9. Keunen J.E., Plaizier J.C., Kyriazakis L., Duffield T.F., Widowski T.M., Lindinger M.I., McBride B.W. Effects of a subacute ruminal acidosis model on the diet selection of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 2002, 85:3304-3313.
10. Khafipour E., Krause D.O., Plaizier J.C. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. J. Dairy Sci 2009, 92:1060-1070. a.
11. Khafipour E., Krause D.O., Plaizier J.C. Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation. J. Dairy Sci 2009, 92:1712-1724. b.
12. Kononoff P.J., Heinrichs A.J., Buckmaster D.R. Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J. Dairy Sci 2003, 86:1858-1863. a.
13. Kononoff P.J., Heinrichs A.J., Lehman H.A. The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 2003, 86:3343-3353. b.
14. Krause K.M., Oetzel G.R. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 2006, 126:215-236.
15. Leonardi C., Armentano L.E. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 2003, 86:557-564.
16. Littell R.C., Henry P.R., Ammerman C.B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci 1998, 76:1216-1231.
17. Maulfair D.D., Zanton G.I., Fustini M., Heinrichs A.J. Effect of feed sorting on chewing behavior, production, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 2010, 93:4791-4803.
18. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 2001, NRC, Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC. 7th rev.
19. Nocek J.E. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J. Dairy Sci 1997, 80:1005-1028.
20. Oetzel G.R., Nordlund K.V., Garrett E.F. Effect of ruminal pH and stage of lactation on ruminal lactate concentration in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 1999, 82(Suppl. 1):38. (Abstr.).
21. Penner G.B., Oba M., Gabel G., Aschenbach J.R. A single mild episode of subacute ruminal acidosis does not affect ruminal barrier function in the short term. J. Dairy Sci 2010, 93:4838-4845.
22. Phy T.S., Provenza F.D. Eating barley too frequently or in excess decreases lambs' preference for barley but sodium bicarbonate and lasalocid attenuate the response. J. Anim. Sci 1998, 76:1578-1583. a.
23. Phy T.S., Provenza F.D. Sheep fed grain prefer foods and solutions that attenuate acidosis. J. Anim. Sci 1998, 76:954-960. b.
24. Shipley R.A., Clark R.E. Tracer Methods for In Vivo Kinetics 1972, Academic Press, New York, NY.
25. Stone, W. C. 1999. The effect of subclinical rumen acidosis on milk components. Pages 40-46 in Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
26. Stone W.C. Nutritional approaches to minimize subacute ruminal acidosis and laminitis in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci 2004, 87(E. Suppl.):E13-E26.
27. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci 1991, 74:3583-3597.
28. Yang C.-M.J., Varga G.A. Effect of three concentrate feeding frequencies on rumen protozoa, rumen digesta kinetics, and milk yield in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci 1989, 72:950-957.
29. Zanton G.I., Heinrichs A.J. Digestion and nitrogen utilization in dairy heifers limit-fed a low or high forage ration at four levels of nitrogen intake. J. Dairy Sci 2009, 92:2078-2094.