Guidelines for trust interface design for public engagement Web GIS

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1668-1687

  Skarlatidou, Artemis ^a   Cheng, Tao ^a   Haklay, Muki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

GIS; human computer interaction; interface design; public engagement; trust

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GIS; GUIDELINE; INTERNET; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DATA; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84884287236     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.766336     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Capriotti, B., 12 October 2010. Do you trust Google maps to get you there? Mystery roads, the slowest routes and how to drive from China to Japan. The Philly Post [online]. http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2010/12/10/do-you-trust-google-maps-to-get-you-there/ (http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2010/12/10/do-you-trust-google-maps-to-get-you-there/) (Accessed: 25 November 2010).
2. Carver, S. 2001. The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st century. URISA Journal, 15 (1): 61 - 71.
3. Chopra, K. and Wallace, W.A. 6-9 January 2003 2003. " Trust in electronic environments ". In Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences 6-9 January 2003, 331 - 340. Hawaii, USA
4. Coleman, S. and Gøtze, J., 2001. Bowling together: online public engagement in policy deliberation [online]. http://www.acteurspublics.com/files/epublic/pdf/scoleman-jgotze-bowling-together.pdf (http://www.acteurspublics.com/files/epublic/pdf/scoleman-jgotze-bowling-together.pdf) (Accessed: 28 Jan 2013).
5. Dantico, M.K. and Mushkatel, A.H. 1991. Public opposition to the siting of the high-level nuclear waste repository: the importance of trust. Policy Studies Review, 10 (4): 180 - 194.
6. DEFRA - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2008. Managing radioactive waste safely: a framework for implementing geological disposal, London: TSO. A White Paper by DEFRA, BERR and the devolved administrations for Wales and Northern Ireland (CM 7386)
7. Dion, K., Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. 1972. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24: 285 - 290.
8. Dominiczak, P. and Parsons, R. 2011. Anger on the quiet streets that website branded crime hotspots. Evening Standard, 2 February: 25
9. Duckham, M. 2002. A user-oriented perspective of error-sensitive GIS development. Transactions in GIS, 6 (2): 179 - 193.
10. Egger, F.N. 27-29 June 2001 2001. " Affective design of e-commerce user interface: how to maximize perceived trustworthiness ". In Proceedings of the international conference on affective human factors design 27-29 June 2001, 317 - 324. Singapore
11. Evans, A., Kingston, R. and Carver, S. 2004. Democratic input into the nuclear waste disposal problem: the influence of geographical data on decision making examined through a Web-based GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6 (3): 117 - 132.
12. Fisher, P. 1993. Visualising uncertainty in soil maps by animation. Cartographica, 30: 20 - 27.
13. Fisher, P. 1994. Hearing the reliability in classified remotely sensed images. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 21: 31 - 36.
14. Fogg, B.J. 2003. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Fung, R.K. and Lee, M.K. 3-15 August 1999 1999. " EC-trust (trust in electronic commerce): exploring the antecedent factors ". In Proceedings of the fifth American conference on information systems Edited by: Haseman, W.D. and Nazareth, D.L. 3-15 August 1999, 517 - 519. Milwaukee, USA
16. Grabner- Kräuter, S. and Kaluscha, E.A. 2003. Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (6): 783 - 812.
17. Haklay, M., Singleton, A. and Parker, C. 2008. Web mapping 2.0: the neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2 (6): 2011 - 2039.
18. Hardy, J. and Evans, N. 6-7 November 2006 2007. UK long term nuclear waste management: next steps? A report of the Loughborough University workshop, 6-7 November 2006, Loughborough: Victoire Cambridge Printers. Loughborough University, UK
19. Harvey, F. 2003. Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: the role of trust. Canadian Geographer, 47 (1): 28 - 36.
20. Hewett, T.T. 1992. ACM SIGCHI curriculum for human-computer interaction, New York: ACM.
21. Hornbaek, K., Bederson, B. and Plaisant, C. 2002. Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9 (4): 362 - 389.
22. House of Lords. 2007. Radioactive waste management: an update. Report with evidence, London: TSO. Science and Technology Committee (HL Paper 109)
23. Jacob, G. 1990. Site unseen: the politics of siting a nuclear waste repository, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
24. Kini, A. and Choobineh, J. 06-09 January 1998 1998. " Trust in electronic commerce: definition and theoretical considerations ". In Proceedings of 31st Hawaii international conference on system sciences Vol. 4, 06-09 January 1998, 51 - 61. Kohala Coast
25. Lee, J.D. and See, K.A. 2002. " Trust in computer technology and the implications for design and evaluation ". In Etiquette for human-computer work: technical report (FS-02-02), Edited by: Miller, C. 20 - 25. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
26. MacEachren, A. 2005. Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: what we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32 (3): 139 - 160.
27. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. 2002. The impact of initial trust on intentions to transact with a website: a trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11 (3-4): 297 - 323.
28. Miller, C. 2006. A beast in the field: the Google maps mashup as GIS. Cartographica, 41: 187 - 199.
29. Monmonier, M. 1996. How to lie with maps, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
30. Nivala, A.M., Brewster, S. and Sarjakoski, L.T. 2008. Usability evaluation on web mapping sites. The Cartographic Journal, 45 (2): 129 - 138.
31. Nyerges, T.L. 1993. " How do people use geographical information systems? ". In Human factors in geographical information systems, Edited by: Medyckyj-Scott, D. and Hearnshaw, H.M. 37 - 50. London: Bellhaven Press.
32. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A. and McCarthy, J.D. 2003. " Shiny, happy people building trust? Photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust ". In Proceedings of CHI'03, human factors in computing systems 121 - 128.
33. Shapiro, S.P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93 (3): 623 - 658.
34. Shneiderman, B. 2000. Designing trust into online experiences. Communication of the ACM, 43 (12): 57 - 59.
35. Sieber, R. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3): 491 - 507.
36. Skarlatidou, A. 2012. Trust in web geographical information systems for public engagement, Unpublished Eng.D. Thesis. University College London.
37. Skarlatidou, A., Cheng, T. and Haklay, M. 2012. What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication. Journal of Risk Analysis, 32 (9): 1496 - 1511.
38. Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M. and Cheng, T. 26-28 May 2010 2010a. " Preliminary investigation of Web GIS trust: the example of the 'WIYBY' website ". In Proceedings of joint international conference on theory, data handling and modelling in geospatial information science 26-28 May 2010, Hong Kong
39. Skarlatidou, A. 14-16 April 2010 2010b. " Trust in Web GIS: a preliminary investigation of the environment agency's WIYBY website with non-expert users ". In Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of GIS research 14-16 April 2010, 439 - 446. London, UK
40. Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M. and Cheng, T. 2011a. Trust in Web GIS: the role of the trustee attributes in the design of trustworthy Web GIS applications. International Journal of GIScience, 25 (12): 1913 - 1930.
41. Skarlatidou, A. 12-15 April 2011 2011b. " Investigating non-experts trust perceptions in spatial decision support systems for public use ". In Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting 12-15 April 2011, Seattle
42. Skarlatidou, A. 2011c. " Understanding the influence of specific Web GIS attributes in the formation of non-experts' trust perceptions ". In Advances in cartography and GIScience selection from ICC 2011, 219 - 238. Paris: Springer.
43. Steinmann, R., Krek, A. and Blaschke, T. 27-29 October 2004 2004. " Analysis of online public participatory GIS applications with respect to the differences between the US and Europe ". In 24th urban data management symposium 27-29 October 2004, Venice, Italy
44. Steinmann, R., Krek, A. and Blaschke, T. 2005. " Can online map-based applications improve citizen participation? ". In Lecture notes in computer science, Edited by: öhler, M. B, Gamper, J., Polasek, W. and Wimmer, M. 25 - 35. Heidelberg: Springer.
45. Travis, A. and Mulholland, H., 2011. Online crime maps crash under weight of 18 million hits an hour. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/feb/01/online-crime-maps-power-hands-people (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/feb/01/online-crime-maps-power-hands-people) (Accessed: 8 March 2011).
46. Unwin, D. 2005. Fiddling on a different planet. Geoforum, 36 (6): 681 - 684.
47. Wang, Y.D. and Emurian, H.H. 2005. An overview of online trust: concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21 (11): 105 - 125.
48. Wong, S. and Chua, Y.L. 2001. Data intermediation and beyond: issues for web-based PPGIS. Cartographica, 38 (3&4): 63 - 80.
49. Zimmermann, P. 2003. Affective computing - a rationale for measuring mood with mouse and keyboard. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 9 (4): 539 - 551.