Participation and inclusiveness in private rule-setting organizations: does it matter for effectiveness?

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 231-250

  Kalfagianni, Agni ^a   Pattberg, Philipp ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

democratic legitimacy; effectiveness; fisheries governance; participation; private rule setting organizations

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84884284124     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2013.771888     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abbot, K. and Snidal, D. 2009. " The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State ". In The Politics of Global Regulation, Edited by: Editor, W. M. and Editor, N. W. 44 - 80. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2. ActionAid International. 2005. " Power Hungry: Six Reasons to Regulate Global Food Corporations." London, ActionAid International. Accessed March 5, 2011. http://www.actionaid.org/docs/power_hungry.pdf
3. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4): 216 - 224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
4. Auld, G., Gulbrandsen, L. H. and McDermott, C. L. 2008. Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33: 187 - 211. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.013007.103754
5. Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development. Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness. European Environment, 16 (5): 290 - 306. doi: 10.1002/eet.425
6. Baron, D., M. A. Harjoto, and H. Jo. 2011. " The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance." Business and Politics 13 (2): Article 1 doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1374
7. Beisheim, M., and K. Dingwerth. 2008. Procedural Legitimacy and Private Transnational Governance. Are the Good Ones Doing Better? SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 14. Accessed January 25, 2013. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/isn/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?ots591=0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233&lng=en&id=90858
8. Belton, B., Haque, M. M., Little, D. C. and Sinh, L. X. 2011. Certifying Catfish in Vietnam and Bangladesh: Who Will Make the Grade and Will it Matter?. Food Policy, 36 (2): 289 - 299. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bap.2011.13.2/bap.2011.13.2.1374/bap.2011.13.2.1374.xml
9. Bernhagen, P. and Mitchell, N. 2010. The Private Provision of Public Goods: Corporate Commitments and the United Nations Global Compact. International Studies Quarterly, 54 (4): 1175 - 1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00631.x
10. Biermann, F. 2007. 'Earth system governance' as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3-4): 326 - 337. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010
11. Biermann, F. and Gupta, A. 2011. Accountability and Legitimacy in Earth System Governance: A Research Framework. Ecological Economics, 70 (11): 1856 - 1864. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008
12. Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., Busch, P. O., Campe, S., Dingwerth, K. and Grothmann, T. 2009. " Studying the Influence of International Bureaucracies: A Conceptual Framework ". In Managers of Global Change, Edited by: Editor, F. B. and Editor, B. S. 37 - 74. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
13. Bodansky, D. 1999. The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?. The American Journal of International Law, 93: 596 - 624. doi: 10.2307/2555262
14. Breitmeier, H., Young, O. R. and Zürn, M. 2006. Analyzing International Environmental Regimes, Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Bulkeley, H. and Mol, A. P. J. 2003. Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate. Environmental Values, 12: 143 - 154. doi: 10.3197/096327103129341261
16. Busch, L. 2000. The Moral Economy of Grades and Standards. Journal of Rural Studies, 16: 273 - 283. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00061-3
17. Busch, L. 2011. Standards. Recipes for Reality. Boston: MIT Press.
18. Bush, S. R., Khiem, N. T. and Sinh, L. X. 2009. Governing the Environmental and Social Dimensions of Pagnasius Production in Vietnam: A Review. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 13 (4): 271 - 293. doi: 10.1080/13657300903351594
19. Clapp, J., and D. Fuchs. 2010. Corporate Power in Global Agrofood Governance. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
20. Cutler, C., Haufler, V. and Porter, T. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs, New York: SUNY.
21. De Búrca, D. 2008. Developing Democracy Beyond the State. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 46: 101 - 158. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1023182
22. DeSombre, E. R., and J. S. Barkin. 2011. Fish. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Dingwerth, K. 2007. The New Transnationalism. Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy, Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
24. Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P. 2007. " Wirkungen transnationaler Umweltregime [The effects of transnational environmental regimes] ". In PVS - Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 39 Politik und Umwelt, Edited by: Jacob, K., Biermann, F., Busch, P. and Feindt, P. H. 133 - 156. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
25. Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P. 2009. World Politics and Organisational Field: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance. European Journal of International Relations, 15: 707 - 743. doi: 10.1177/1354066109345056
26. Dobson, A. 1993. " Critical Theory and Green Politics ". In The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory, Edited by: Editor, A. D. and Editor, P. L. 190 - 209. London: Routledge.
27. Eckersley, R. 2007. Ambushed: The Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy. International Politics, 44: 306 - 324. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800190
28. Estlund, D. 2009. " Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Authority ". In Does Truth Matter?, Edited by: Editor, R. G. and Editor, R. T. 15 - 27. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. eISBN: 978-1-4020-8849-0
29. Estlund, D. 2005. " Democratic Theory ". In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Edited by: Editor, F. J. and Editor, M. S. 208 - 230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome: FAO.
31. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 2011. Private Standards and Certification in Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: FAO.
32. Falkner, R. 2003. Private Environmental Governance and International Relations: Exploring the Links. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (2): 72 - 87. doi: 10.1162/152638003322068227
33. Fuchs, D. and Kalfagianni, A. 2010. " The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Authority in the Food Chain ". In The Challenges of Global Business Authority: Democratic Renewal, Stalemate or Decay?, Edited by: Porter, T. and Ronit, K. 88 - 118. New York: SUNY.
34. Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A. and Havinga, T. 2011. Actors in Private Food Governance: The Legitimacy of Retail Standards and Multistakeholder Initiatives with Civil Society Participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28 (3): 353 - 367. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9236-3
35. Goodin, R. 1992. Green Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity.
36. Graz, J. C., and A. Nölke. 2008. Transnational Private Governance and Its Limits. London: Routledge.
37. Green, J. 2010. " Private Standards in the Climate Regime: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol." Business and Politics 12 (3): Article 3. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bap.2010.12.3/bap.2010.12.3.1318/bap.2010.12.3.1318.xml
38. Gulbrandsen, H. L. 2009. The Emergence and Effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy, 33: 654 - 660. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.01.002
39. Gulbrandsen, H. L. 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries, Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
40. Gullison, R. E. 2003. Does Forest Certification Conserve Biodiversity?. Oryx, 37: 153 - 165. doi: 10.1017/S0030605303000346
41. Hachez, N. and Wouters, J. 2011. A Glimpse at the Democratic Legitimacy of Private Standards. Assessing the Public Accountability of GlobalG.A.P. Journal of International Economic Law, 14 (3): 677 - 710. doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgr026
42. Idlebrook, C. 2010. " Canadian and U.S. Fisheries Pursue Seafood Certification. The Working Waterfront December 2010-January 2011." Accessed January 25. http://www.workingwaterfront.com/articles/Canadian-and-US-fisheries-pursue-seafood-certification/14110/
43. Jacquet, J., Hocevar, J., Pelletier, N., Pitcher, T., Sala, E. and Sumaila, R. 2009. Conserving wild fish in a sea of market-based efforts. Oryx. The International Journal of Conservation, 44 (1): 45 - 56.
44. Jacquet, J. L. and Pauly, D. 2010. Seafood Stewardship in Crisis. Nature, 467: 28 - 29. doi: 10.1038/467028a
45. Kaiser, M. J. and Edward-Jones, G. 2006. The Role of Ecolabeling in Fisheries Management and Conservation. Conservation Biology, 20 (2): 392 - 398. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00319.x
46. Kalfagianni, A. and Fuchs, D. 2011. " The GlobalGAP ". In Business, Non-State Regulation and Development, Edited by: Editor, A. R., Editor, D. R. and Editor, P. U. 160 - 172. London: Routledge.
47. Kalfagianni, A., and P. Pattberg. 2011. The Effectiveness of Transnational Rule-Setting Organisations in Global Sustainability Politics: An Analytical Framework. Global Governance Working Paper No 43. Amsterdam: The Global Governance Project. Accessed January 25, 2013. http://www.glogov.org
48. Kalfagianni, A. and Pattberg, P. 2013. Fishing in Muddy Waters? Conditions for Effective Private Governance in Fisheries and Squaculture. Marine Policy, 38: 124 - 132. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.028
49. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. and Vihma, A. 2009. Comparing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Global Hard and Soft Law: An Analytical Framework. Regulation & Governance, 3: 400 - 420. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01062.x
50. Keohane, R. and Nye, N. 2001. " The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy ". In Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy. The Multilateral Trading Dystem at the Millenium, Edited by: Porter, R. B., Sauvé, P., Subramanian, A. and Beviglia-Zampetti, A. 264 - 294. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
51. Matz, N. 2005. Financial Institutions between Effectiveness and Legitimacy - A Legal Analysis of the World Bank, Global Environmental Facility and Prototype of Carbon Fund. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5: 265 - 302. doi: 10.1007/s10784-005-3806-7
52. Miller, D. 1992. Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice. Political Studies, 40: 54 - 67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01812.x
53. Muradian, R. and Pelupessy, W. 2005. Governing the coffee chain: The role of voluntary regulatory systems. World Development, 33 (12): 2029 - 2044. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X05001567
54. Newell, P., Pattberg, P. and Schroeder, H. 2012. Multi Actor Governance and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37: 365 - 387. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659
55. Neyer, J. 2004. Postnationale politische Herrschaft [Postnational political rule]. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
56. Oosterveer, P. 2008. Governing Global Fish Provisioning: Ownership and Management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 51: 797 - 805. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.08.002
57. Pattberg, P. 2012. " Transnational Environmental Regimes ". In Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered, Edited by: Biermann, F. and Pattberg, P. 97 - 122. Cambridge: MIT Press.
58. Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
59. Ponte, S. 2008. Greener than thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabelling and its Local Manifestations in South Africa. World Development, 36 (1): 159 - 175. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.014
60. Porter, T., and K. Ronit. 2010. The Challenges of Global Business Authority: Democratic Renewal, Stalemate or Decay? New York: SUNY.
61. Rosendal, K. G. and Andresen, S. 2011. Institutional Design for Improved Forest Governance through REDD: Lessons from the Global Environmental Facility. Ecological Economics, 70 (11): 1908 - 1915. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.001
62. Saward, M. 2003. Enacting Democracy. Political Studies, 51: 161 - 179. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00418
63. Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO: Westeview Press.
64. Scharpf, F. 2003. "Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU." MPIfG Working Paper 03/1. Accessed February 2013. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp03-1/wp03-1.html.
65. Scholte, J. A. 2008. Reconstructing Contemporary Democracy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 15XXX: 1 - 47. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/gls/summary/v015/15.1.scholte.html
66. Vogel, D. 2005. The Market for Virtue, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
67. Vogelpohl, T., and B. Hirschol. 2012. " The Institutional Sustainability of Public-Private Arrangements- The Case of EU Biofuels Sustainability Regulation." Paper presented at the Earth System Governance Conference, Lund, April 18-20.
68. Ward, T. 2008. Barriers to Biodiversity Conservation in Marine Fishery Certification. Fish and Fisheries, 9: 169 - 177.
69. Wolf, C. D. 2002. " Governance: Concepts ". In Participatory Governance. Political and Docietal Implications, Edited by: Grote, J. R. and Gbiki, B. 35 - 50. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
70. Zürn, M. 2004. Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition, 39 (2): 260 - 228. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x/abstract