Modeling SF-6D hong kong standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric bayesian method

Value in Health

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1032-1045

  Kharroubi, Samer A ^a   Brazier, John E ^b   McGhee, Sarah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

covariates nonparametric Bayesian methods preference based health measure SF 6D

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HONG KONG; HUMAN; PARAMETRIC TEST; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX; SHORT FORM 36;

COVARIATES; NONPARAMETRIC BAYESIAN METHODS; PREFERENCE-BASED HEALTH MEASURE; SF-6D;

ALGORITHMS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HONG KONG; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84884276559     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J.E. Brazier, J. Ratcliffe, A. Tsuchiya, and J. Solomon Measuring and Valuing Health for Economic Evaluation 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford
2. R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play Health Policy 37 1996 53 72
3. G.W. Torrance, D.H. Feeny, and W.J. Furlong Multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark 2 Med Care 34 1996 702 722
4. D.H. Feeny, W.J. Furlong, and G.W. Torrance Multi-attribute and single-attribute utility function for the Health Utility Index Mark 3 system Med Care 40 2002 113 128
5. Sintonen H. The 15D-Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life, I: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of Its Health State Descriptive System. Working Paper 41, National Center for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, 1994.
6. Sintonen H. The 15D-Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life, II: Feasibility, Reliability and Validity of Its Valuation System. Working Paper 42, National Center for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne, 1995.
7. G. Hawthorne, G. Richardson, and N. Atherton-Day A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments Ann Intern Med 33 2001 358 370
8. R.M. Kaplan, and J.P. Anderson A general health policy model: update and application Health Serv Res 23 1988 203 235
9. J.E. Brazier, J. Roberts, and M. Deverill The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 J Health Econ 21 2002 271 292
10. D.A. Revicki, N.K. Leidy, and F. Brennan-Diemer Integrating patients' preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute asthma symptom utility index Chest 114 1998 998 1007
11. J.E. Brazier, C. Czoski-Murray, and J. Roberts Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition specific measure: the King's Health Questionnaire Med Decis Making 28 2008 113 126
12. M.F. Drummond, M. Sculpher, and B. O'Brien Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes 2005 Oxford Medical Publications Oxford
13. P. Dolan Modeling valuation for Euroqol health states Med Care 35 1997 351 363
14. C. McCabe, K. Stevens, J. Roberts, and J.E. Brazier Health state values for the HUI2 descriptive system: results from a UK Survey Health Econ 14 2005 231 244
15. S.A. Kharroubi, A. O'Hagan, and J.E. Brazier Estimating utilities from individual health state preference data: a nonparametric Bayesian approach App Stat 54 2005 879 895
16. S.A. Kharroubi, J. Brazier, A. O'Hagan, and J. Roberts Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method J Health Econ 26 2007 597 612
17. S.A. Kharroubi, J. Brazier, A. O'Hagan, and J. Roberts Modelling covariates for the SF-6D standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method Soc Sci Med 64 2007 1242 1252
18. S.A. Kharroubi, and C. McCabe Modelling HUI 2 health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method Med Decis Making 28 2008 875 887
19. S.M. McGhee, J. Brazier, and C.L.K. Lam Quality adjusted life years: population specific measurement of the quality component Hong Kong Med J 17 Suppl. 6 2011 S17 S21
20. J.E. Ware, and C.D. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 1992 473 483
21. C.L. Lam, J. Brazier, and S.M. McGhee Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population Value Health 11 2008 295 303
22. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between measurement Biochimica Clinica 11 1987 399 404
23. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. Women and Men in Hong Kong: Key Statistics. Hong Kong, China: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 2006.
24. P. Dolan, and J. Roberts To what extent can we explain time trade-off values from other information about respondents? Soc Sci Med 54 2002 919 929
25. P. Dolan The effect of age on health state valuations J Health Serv Res Policy 5 2000 17 21
26. A. Robinson, P. Dolan, and A. Williams Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers? Soc Sci Med 45 1997 1289 1297
27. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Pharmacoeconomics guidelines from around the world, 2006. Available from: www.ispor.org/PEguidelines/index.-asp. [Accessed January 29, 2013].