How do plant communities and flower visitors relate? A case study of semi-natural xerothermic grasslands

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-105

  Chmura, Damian ^a   Adamski, Paweł ^b   Denisiuk, Zygmunt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIELSKO BIALA   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF NATURE CONSERVATION   (Poland)

Author keywords

Calcareous vegetation; Co CA; Entomofauna; Null model; Sampling effort; Species richness

Indexed keywords

ADONIS VERNALIS; ANEMONE; BRACHYPODIETUM; CARLINA; HEXAPODA; INULA; INULA ENSIFOLIA; LINUM;

EID: 84884224598     PISSN: 00016977     EISSN: 20839480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2013.015     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko AA, Baur A, Erhardt A, et al. Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to regional biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol. 2005;19(5):1606-1618. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00084.x (Pubitemid 41721959)
2. Öckinger E, Eriksson AK, Smith HG. Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biol Conserv. 2006;133(3):291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.009 (Pubitemid 44466601)
3. Dzwonko Z, Loster S. Changes in species composition of an abandoned limestone grassland in relation to climatic conditions. Pol J Ecol. 2011;59(4):687-698.
4. Dzwonko Z, Loster S. Changes in plant species composition in abandoned and restored limestone grasslands-the effects of three and shrub cutting. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2008;77(1):67-75. (Pubitemid 351579460)
5. Wahlman H, Milberg P. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden. Ann Bot Fenn. 2002;39:159-166. (Pubitemid 34749685)
6. Baba W, Kurowska M, Kompała-Baba A, Wilczek A, Długosz J, Szarejko I. Genetic diversity of populations of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) P. Beauv.: expansive grass in a fragmented landscape. Pol J Ecol. 2012;60(1):31-40.
7. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 2005;8(8):857-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2005.00782.x (Pubitemid 41009261)
8. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett. 2007;10(4):299-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x (Pubitemid 46426872)
9. Öckinger E, Smith HG. Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol. 2006;44(1):50-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x (Pubitemid 46046333)
10. Taki H, Kevan PG, Ascher JS. Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system. Landsc Ecol. 2007;22(10):1575-1587. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10980-007-9153-z (Pubitemid 350059886)
11. Lopes LE, Buzato S. Variation in pollinator assemblages in a fragmented landscape and its effects on reproductive stages of a self-incompatible treelet, Psychotria suterella (Rubiaceae). Oecologia. 2007;154(2):305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0830-z (Pubitemid 350077122)
12. Thomas JA, Bourn N. D, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, et al. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;268(1478):1791-1796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1693 (Pubitemid 32844026)
13. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15(4):140-143. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X (Pubitemid 30151590)
14. Zych M. On flower visitors and true pollinators: the case of protandrous Heracleum sphondylium L. (Apiaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2006;263(3-4):159-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0493-y (Pubitemid 46204547)
15. Watts S, Ovalle DH, Herrera MM, Ollerton J. Pollinator effectiveness of native and non-native flower visitors to an apparently generalist Andean shrub, Duranta mandonii (Verbenaceae). Plant Species Biol. 2012;27(2):147-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2011.00337.x
16. ter Braak CJF, Schaffers AP. Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology. 2004;85(3):834- 846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0021 (Pubitemid 38398294)
17. Chmura D, Adamski P, Denisiuk Z. The plant-pollinator interactions in xerothermic habitats using phytosociological data. In: Chytrý M, editor. 17th International Workshop European Vegetation Survey. Using phytosociological data to address ecological questions, 1-5 May 2008, Brno, Czech Republik. Brno: Masaryk University; 2008. p. 25.
18. Denisiuk Z, Chmura D, Adamski P. Flowering and generative reproduction in small, isolated populations of endangered monocarpic perennial Carlina onopordifolia Besser (Asteraceae) in Poland. Pol J Ecol. 2009;57(1):89-97.
19. Westhoff V, van der Maarel E. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker RH, editor. Classification of plant communities. Hague: Junk; 1978. p. 287-399.
20. Pollard E. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv. 1977;12(2):115-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006- 3207(77)90065-9
21. Pollard E, Yates TJ. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation: the British butterfly monitoring scheme. London: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
22. Tolman T. Butterflies of Europe. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001.
23. De la Barrera E, Nobel PS. Nectar: properties, floral aspects, and speculations on origin. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(2):65-69. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.tplants.2003.12.003 (Pubitemid 38215134)
24. Hill MO. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology. 1973;54:427-432.
25. The R project for statistical computing [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2012 Sep 27]; Available from: http://www.R-project.org
26. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). New York NY: Microcomputer Power; 2002.
27. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D. Zeigerwerte der Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot. 1992;18:1-248.
28. Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2001.
29. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL. EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7 [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2012 Mar 31]; Available from: http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm
30. Stone L, Roberts A. The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia. 1990;85(1):74-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317345
31. Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ. Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond's assembly rules model. Ecology. 2002;83(8):2091-2096. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2091:SCOAMA]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 36530704)
32. van Der Werf W, Woldewahid G, Van Huis A, Butrous M, Sykora K. Plant communities can predict the distribution of solitarious desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Appl Ecol. 2005;42(5):989-997. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01073.x (Pubitemid 41727038)
33. Agrawal AA, Lau JA, Hambäck PA. Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Q Rev Biol. 2006;81(4):349-376. (Pubitemid 46013473)
34. Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie R. Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am Nat. 1998;152(5):738-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/286204 (Pubitemid 28486053)
35. Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, et al. Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol Lett. 1999;2(5):286-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00083.x (Pubitemid 29456313)
36. Hatfield R, Lebuhn G. Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), in montane meadows. Biol Conserv. 2007;139(1-2):150-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2007.06.019 (Pubitemid 47320615)
37. Albrecht M, Duelli P, MüLler C, Kleijn D, Schmid B. The Swiss agri-environment scheme enhances pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in nearby intensively managed farmland. J Appl Phycol. 2007;44(4):813-822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01306.x (Pubitemid 47024864)
38. Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M. Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. Agric Ecosyst Env. 2007;121(4):319-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.001 (Pubitemid 46441532)
39. Fontaine C, Dajoz I, Meriguet J, Loreau M. Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. Plos Biol. 2006;4(1):e1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040001
40. Ollerton J, Cranmer L. Latitudinal trends in plant-pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? Oikos. 2002;98(2):340-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980215.x
41. Gioria M, Bacaro G, Feehan J. Evaluating and interpreting cross-taxon congruence: potential pitfalls and solutions. Acta Oecol. 2011;37(3):187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.02.001
42. Martinko EA, Hagen RH, Griffith JA. Successional change in the insect community of a fragmented landscape. Landsc Ecol. 2006;21(5):711-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5322-0 (Pubitemid 44087280)
43. Lopes LE, Buzato S. Variation in pollinator assemblages in a fragmented landscape and its effects on reproductive stages of a self-incompatible treelet, Psychotria suterella (Rubiaceae). Oecologia. 2007;154(2):305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0830-z (Pubitemid 350077122)
44. Schaffers AP, Raemakers IP, Sýkora KV, ter Braak CJF. Arthropod assemblages are best predicted by plant species composition. Ecology. 2008;89(3):782-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0361.1 (Pubitemid 351550011)
45. Hopwood JL. The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv. 2008;141(10):2632-2640. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.biocon.2008.07.026
46. Powell JA, Logan JA. Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature-driven life cycles. Theor Popul Biol. 2005;67(3):161-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2004.10.001 (Pubitemid 40451536)
47. Yurk BP, Powell JA. Modeling the evolution of insect phenology. Bull Math Biol. 2008;71(4):952-979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9389-z
48. Moroń D, Lenda M, Skórka P, Szentgyörgyi H, Settele J, Woyciechowski M. Wild pollinator communities are negatively affected by invasion of alien goldenrods in grassland landscapes. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(7):1322-1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.036
49. Kwaiser KS, Hendrix SD. Diversity and abundance of bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in native and ruderal grasslands of agriculturally dominated landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Env. 2008;124(3-4):200-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.agee.2007.09.012 (Pubitemid 351288939)
50. Tello JS, Stevens RD, Dick CW. Patterns of species co-occurrence and density compensation: a test for interspecific competition in bat ectoparasite infracommunities. Oikos. 2008;117(5):693-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0030- 1299.2008.16212.x (Pubitemid 351614836)