Structure-function relationships in hydrophobins: Probing the role of charged side chains

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 79, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 5533-5538

  Lienemann, Michael ^a   Gandier, Julie Anne ^b   Joensuu, Jussi J ^a   Iwanaga, Atsushi ^c   Takatsuji, Yoshiyuki ^c   Haruyama, Tetsuya ^c   Master, Emma ^b,e   Tenkanen, Maija ^d   Lindera, Markus B ^a,e  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^e AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS TWO PHASE SYSTEM; CHARGED AMINO ACIDS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; PROTEIN IMMOBILIZATION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

AMINO ACIDS; OLIGOMERIZATION; OLIGOMERS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

PROTEINS;

AMINO ACID; FUNGUS; IMMOBILIZATION; MUTATION; PROTEIN; PURIFICATION; STABILIZATION; SURFACTANT;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; HYBRID PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; GENE FUSION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; REPORTER GENE; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; TRICHODERMA;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTIFICIAL GENE FUSION; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENES, REPORTER; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; TRICHODERMA;

EID: 84884220390     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01493-13     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setälä T, Penttilä ME. 2005. Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:877-896.
2. Wösten HAB, Willey JM. 2000. Surface-active proteins enable microbial aerial hyphae to grow into the air. Microbiology 146:767-773.
3. Bayry J, Aimanianda V, Guijarro JI, Sunde M, Latgé J-P. 2012. Hydrophobins- unique fungal proteins. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002700. doi:10.1371 /journal.ppat.1002700.
4. Cox PW, Hooley P. 2009. Hydrophobins: new prospects for biotechnology. Fungal Biol. Rev. 23:40-47.
5. Cox AR, Aldred DL, Russell AB. 2009. Exceptional stability of food foams using class II hydrophobin HFBII. Food Hydrocolloids 23:366- 376.
6. Valo HK, Laaksonen PH, Peltonen LJ, Linder MB, Hirvonen JT, Laaksonen TJ. 2010. Multifunctional hydrophobin: toward functional coatings for drug nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4:1750-1758.
7. Joensuu JJ, Conley AJ, Lienemann M, Brandle JE, Linder MB, Menassa R. 2010. Hydrophobin fusions for high-level transient protein expression and purification in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Physiol. 152:622-633.
8. Paananen A, Ercili-Cura D, Saloheimo M, Lantto R, Linder MB. 2013. Directing enzymatic cross-linking activity to the air-water interface by a fusion protein approach. Soft Matter 9:1612. doi:10.1039/c2sm27234b.
9. Scholtmeijer K, Janssen MI, Gerssen B, de Vocht ML, van Leeuwen BM, van Kooten TG, Wösten HAB, Wessels JGH. 2002. Surface modifications created by using engineered hydrophobins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1367-1373.
10. Linder MB, Qiao M, Laumen F, Selber K, Hyytiä T, Nakari-Setälä T, Penttilä ME. 2004. Efficient purification of recombinant proteins using hydrophobins as tags in surfactant-based two-phase systems. Biochemistry 43:11873-11882.
11. Hakanpää J, Linder M, Popov A, Schmidt A, Rouvinen J. 2006. Hydrophobin HFBII in detail: ultrahigh-resolution structure at 0.75Å. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62:356-367.
12. Kallio JM, Linder MB, Rouvinen J. 2007. Crystal structures of hydrophobin HFBII in the presence of detergent implicate the formation of fibrils and monolayer films. J. Biol. Chem. 282:28733-28739.
13. Hakanpaa J, Paananen A, Askolin S, Nakari-Setälä T, Parkkinen T, Penttilä M, Linder MB, Rouvinen J. 2004. Atomic resolution structure of the HFBII hydrophobin, a self-assembling amphiphile. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 534-539.
14. Kwan A, Winefield RD, Sunde M, Matthews JM, Haverkamp RG, Templeton MD, Mackay JP. 2006. Structural basis for rodlet assembly in fungal hydrophobins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:3621-3626.
15. Walther A, Müller AHE. 2013. Janus particles: synthesis, self-assembly, physical properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 113:5194-5261.
16. Chandler D. 2005. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437:640-647.
17. Blijdenstein TBJ, de Groot PWN, Stoyanov SD. 2010. On the link between foam coarsening and surface rheology: why hydrophobins are so different. Soft Matter 6:1799. doi:10.1039/b925648b.
18. Szilvay GR, Kisko K, Serimaa R, Linder MB. 2007. The relation between solution association and surface activity of the hydrophobin HFBI from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Lett. 581:2721-2726.
19. Szilvay GR, Paananen A, Laurikainen K, Vuorimaa E, Lemmetyinen H, Peltonen J, Linder MB. 2007. Self-assembled hydrophobin protein films at the air-water interface: structural analysis and molecular engineering. Biochemistry 46:2345-2354.
20. Wessels JG. 1997. Hydrophobins: proteins that change the nature of the fungal surface. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 38:1-45.
21. Sunde M, Kwan AHY, Templeton MD, Beever RE, Mackay JP. 2008. Structural analysis of hydrophobins. Micron 39:773-784.
22. Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J. 1987. Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236:1299-1302.
23. Mason HS, Guerrero FD, Boyer JS, Mullet JE. 1988. Proteins homologous to leaf glycoproteins are abundant in stems of dark-grown soybean seedlings. Analysis of proteins and cDNAs. Plant Mol. Biol. 11:845-856.
24. Wu K, Malik K, Tian L, Hu M, Martin T, Foster E, Brown D, Miki B. 2001. Enhancers and core promoter elements are essential for the activity of a cryptic gene activation sequence from tobacco, tCUP. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265:763-770.
25. Cutt J, Dixon D, Carr J, Klessig D. 1988. Isolation and nucleotidesequence of cDNA clones for the pathogenesis-related proteins Pr1a, Pr1b and Pr1c of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi nc induced by TMV infection. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:9861.
26. Schmidt TG, Koepke J, Frank R, Skerra A. 1996. Molecular interaction between the Strep-tag affinity peptide and its cognate target, streptavidin. J. Mol. Biol. 255:753-766.
27. Joensuu JJ, Conley AJ, Linder MB, Menassa R. 2012. Bioseparation of recombinant proteins from plant extract with hydrophobin fusion technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 824:527-534.
28. Marx KA. 2003. Quartz crystal microbalance: a useful tool for studying thin polymer films and complex biomolecular systems at the solutionsurface interface. Biomacromolecules 4:1099-1120.
29. Roda B, Zattoni A, Reschiglian P, Moon MH, Mirasoli M, Michelini E, Roda A. 2009. Field-flow fractionation in bioanalysis: a review of recent trends. Anal. Chim. Acta 635:132-143.
30. Bordier C. 1981. Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution. J. Biol. Chem. 256:1604-1607.
31. Sivars U, Tjerneld F. 2000. Mechanisms of phase behaviour and protein partitioning in detergent/polymer aqueous two-phase systems for purification of integral membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1474:133- 146.
32. Linder M, Selber K, Nakari-Setälä T, Qiao M, Kula M-R, Penttilä M. 2001. The hydrophobins HFBI and HFBII from Trichoderma reesei showing efficient interactions with nonionic surfactants in aqueous two-phase systems. Biomacromolecules 2:511-517.