Utilizing micro-computed tomography to evaluate bone structure surrounding dental implants: A comparison with histomorphometry

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1259-1266

  Vandeweghe, Stefan ^a,b   Coelho, Paulo G ^c   Vanhove, Christian ^b   Wennerberg, Ann ^a   Jimbo, Ryo ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bone implant contact; dental implants; histomorphometry; micro CT; osseointegration

Indexed keywords

HISTOMORPHOMETRY; IMPLANT MATERIALS; MICRO CT; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RELIABLE METHODS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

BONE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; HISTOLOGY; TITANIUM;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE QUALITY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; VALIDITY;

BONE-IMPLANT CONTACT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HISTOMORPHOMETRY; MICRO-CT; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84884203075     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32938     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Attard NJ, Zarb GA,. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17 (4): 417-424.
2. Bergenblock S, Andersson B, Furst B, Jemt T,. Long-term follow-up of ceraone single-implant restorations: An 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 June 25. [Epub ahead of print]
3. Jemt T,. Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: Comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21 (5): 400-408.
4. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M,. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4 (1): 3-11.
5. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G,. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res 1990; 8 (6): 833-842.
6. Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, Van Der Perre G, Dequeker J, Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P,. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: A quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 1998; 23 (1): 59-66.
7. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, Endo N, Takahashi HE, Hara T,. A morphometric comparison of trabecular structure of human ilium between microcomputed tomography and conventional histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 61 (6): 493-498.
8. Boas FE, Fleischmann D,. CT artifacts: Causes and reduction techniques. Imaging 2012; 4 (2): 229-240.
9. Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Müller B, Thurner P, Schliephake H, Wyss P, Beckmann F, Goebbels J, Worch H,. Comparison of microfocus- and synchrotron X-ray tomography for the analysis of osteointegration around Ti6Al4V implants. Eur Cell Mater 2004; 7: 42-51; discussion 51.
10. Sarve H, Lindblad J, Borgefors G, Johansson CB,. Extracting 3D information on bone remodeling in the proximity of titanium implants in SRmuCT image volumes. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2011; 102 (1): 25-34.
11. Van Oossterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, Jansen J, Wevers M, Naert I,. Use of microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique for characterizing bone tissue around oral implants. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26 (1): 5-12.
12. Stoppie N, van der Waerden JP, Jansen JA, Duyck J, Wevers M, Naert IE,. Validation of microfocus computed tomography in the evaluation of bone implant specimens. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 (2): 87-94.
13. Freilich M, Shafer D, Wei M, Kompalli R, Adams D, Kuhn L,. Implant system for guiding a new layer of bone. Computed microtomography and histomorphometric analysis in the rabbit mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (2): 201-207.
14. Schouten C, Meijer GJ, van den Beucken JJ, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA,. The quantitative assessment of peri-implant bone responses using histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography. Biomaterials 2009; 30 (27): 4539-4549.
15. Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang TL, Nishimura I,. Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21 (5): 687-695.
16. Ikeda H, Rossouw PE, Campbell PM, Kontogirogos E, Buschang PH,. Three-dimensional analysis of peri-bone-implant contact of rough-surface miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139 (2): e153-e163.
17. Dewulf W, Tan Y, Kiekens K,. Sense and non-sense of beam hardening correction in CT metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2012; 61 (1): 495-498.
18. Mouzin O, Soballe K, Bechtold JE,. Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58 (1): 61-68.
19. Johansson CB, Morberg P,. Importance of ground section thickness for reliable histomorphometrical results. Biomaterials 1995; 16 (2): 91-95.
20. Tamminen IS, Isaksson H, Aula AS, Honkanen E, Jurvelin JS, Kroger H,. Reproducibility and agreement of micro-CT and histomorphometry in human trabecular bone with different metabolic status. J Bone Miner Metab 2011; 29 (4): 442-448.