Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 159, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 435-

  Kumasawa, Junji ^a   Kurita, Noriaki ^a   Fukuhara, Shunichi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEATH; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; LETTER; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; MALE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; NOTE;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84884179461     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00016     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Baker L, Kazi DS, Solomon MD, Chang TI, et al. Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary bypass surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:727-34. [PMID: 23609014]
2. McNulty EJ, Ng W, Spertus JA, Zaroff JG, Yeh RW, Ren XM, et al. Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1020-7. [PMID: 21939943]
3. Stukel TA, Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Alter DA, Gottlieb DJ, Vermeulen MJ. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. JAMA. 2007;297:278-85. [PMID: 17227979]