Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary bypass surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: A cohort study

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 158, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 727-734

  Hlatky, Mark A ^a   Boothroyd, Derek B ^a   Baker, Laurence ^a   Kazi, Dhruv S ^b   Solomon, Matthew D ^c   Chang, Tara I ^a   Shilane, David ^a   Go, Alan S ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART FAILURE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY FAILURE; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; SURVIVAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICARE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878083762     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00639     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomizedtrial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1600-6. [PMID: 17433949]
2. King SB 3rd, Kosinski AS, Guyton RA, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS. Eightyearmortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). J Am CollCardiol. 2000;35:1116-21. [PMID: 10758949]
3. Serruys PW, Ong AT, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier JJ, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for thetreatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial RevascularizationTherapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:575-81. [PMID: 16098418]
4. Booth J, Clayton T, Pepper J, Nugara F, Flather M, Sigwart U, et al; SoSInvestigators. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versuspercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary arterydisease: six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS). Circulation.2008;118:381-8. [PMID: 18606919]
5. Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, Soares PR, Ribeiro EE, Pereira AC, et al. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study(MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies formultivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122:949-57. [PMID:20733102]
6. Rodriguez AE, Baldi J, Fernández Pereira C, Navia J, Rodriguez Alemparte M, Delacasa A, et al; ERACI II Investigators. Five-year follow-up of the Argentinerandomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypasssurgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). J Am Coll Cardiol.2005;46:582-8. [PMID: 16098419]
7. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versuscoronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.2009;360:961-72. [PMID: 19228612]
8. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronaryinterventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patientdata from ten randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373:1190-7. [PMID: 19303634]
9. Parsons LS. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample usinggreedy matching techniques. Presented at 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, 22-25 April 2001, Long Beach, California.
10. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, O'Brien SM, Peterson ED, Kolm P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1467-76. [PMID: 22452338]
11. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al; FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Strategies for multivessel revascularizationin patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2375-84. [PMID: 23121323]
12. van Domburg RT, Meeter K, van Berkel DF, Veldkamp RF, van Herwerden LA, Bogers AJ. Smoking cessation reduces mortality after coronary arterybypass surgery: a 20-year follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:878-883.[PMID: 10987614]
13. Hasdai D, Garratt KN, Grill DE, Lerman A, Holmes DR Jr. Effect ofsmoking status on the long-term outcome after successful percutaneous coronaryrevascularization. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:755-761. [PMID: 9052653]
14. Crouse JR 3rd, Hagaman AP. Smoking cessation in relation to cardiacprocedures. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:699-703. [PMID: 1951275]