The 3-year medical school - Change or shortchange?

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 369, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1087-1089

  Goldfarb, Stanley ^a   Morrison, Gail ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SHORT SURVEY; WORK EXPERIENCE;

EID: 84884175848     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1306457     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Emanuel EJ, Fuchs VR. Shortening medical training by 30%. JAMA 2012;307:1143-4.
2. Lyss-Lerman P, Teherani A, Aagaard E, Loeser H, Cooke M, Harper GM. What training is needed in the fourth year of medical school? Views of residency program directors. Acad Med 2009;84:823-9.
3. Eaglen RH, Arnold L, Girotti JA, et al. The scope and variety of combined baccalaureate-MD programs in the United States. Acad Med 2012;87:1600-8.
4. Page RC, Boulger JG. An assessment of the three-year medical curriculum. J Med Educ 1976;51:125-6.
5. Kettel LJ, Dinham SM, Drach GW, Barbee RA. Arizona's three-year medical curriculum: a postmortem. J Med Educ 1979;54:210-6. (Pubitemid 10051746)