Are morbidly obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at an increased risk for component malpositioning?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 8 SUPPL, 2013, Pages 41-44

  Elson, Leah C ^a   Barr, Christopher J ^a   Chandran, Shaun E ^a   Hansen, Viktor Johannes ^a   Malchau, Henrik ^a   Kwon, Young Min ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Component malpositioning; Obesity; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBID OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RISK FACTOR; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

COMPONENT MALPOSITIONING; OBESITY; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BODY MASS INDEX; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY, MORBID; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884164383     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.035     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kurtz S., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in United States from 2005 to 2030. JBJS 2007, 89(4):780.
2. Kelley S.S., Lachie-wicz P.F., Hickman J.M. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, (355):163.
3. Kummer F.J., Shah S., Lyer S., et al. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14(4):509.
4. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22(4):815.
5. Ali Khan M.A., Brakenbury P.H., Reynolds I.S. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981, 63-B(2):214.
6. De Haan R., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90(10):1291.
7. Gallo J., Havranek V., Zapletalova J. Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2010, 34(1):19.
8. Holt G., Murnaghan C., Reilly J., et al. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 460:240.
9. Leslie I.J., et al. High cup angle and microseparation increase the wear of hip surface replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(9):2259.
10. Shon W.Y., et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(4):427.
11. Yamaguchi M., et al. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15(3):305.
12. Callanan M.C., et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. CORR 2011, 469(2):319.
13. Finkelstein E.A., Khavjou O.A., Thompson H., et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med 2012, 42(6):563.
14. Dowsey M.M., Choong P.F. Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:153.
15. Namba R.S., Paxton L., Fithian D.C., et al. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:46.
16. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60(2):217.