Genomics in marine monitoring: New opportunities for assessing marine health status

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 19-31

  Bourlat, Sarah J ^a   Borja, Angel ^b   Gilbert, Jack ^c   Taylor, Martin I ^d   Davies, Neil ^e,f   Weisberg, Stephen B ^g   Griffith, John F ^g   Lettieri, Teresa ^h   Field, Dawn ^f,i   Benzie, John ^j,k   Glöckner, Frank Oliver ^l   Rodríguez Ezpeleta, Naiara ^b   Faith, Daniel P ^m   Bean, Tim P ⁿ   Obst, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^g SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT   (United States)

^h JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

ⁱ CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^k WORLDFISH   (Malaysia)

^l MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MARINE MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^m AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

ⁿ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Genomic observatories; Genomics; Indicators; Innovative monitoring methods; Marine health status; Marine monitoring

Indexed keywords

GENES; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS; GENOMICS; GENOMICS TECHNOLOGIES; HEALTH STATUS; MARINE MONITORING; MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES; MONITORING METHODS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATIONS;

MONITORING;

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENOMICS; INNOVATION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT;

ARTICLE; DNA BARCODING; ECOLOGICAL GENETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENE TECHNOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE HEALTH STATUS; METAGENOMICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84884157938     PISSN: 0025326X     EISSN: 18793363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.042     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ankley G.T., Daston G.P., et al. Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40(13):4055-4065.
2. Apitz S.E., Elliott M., Fountain M., Galloway T.S. European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2006, 2:80-85.
3. Baird D.J., Hajibabaei M. Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21(8):2039-2044.
4. Ban N., Alder J. How wild is the ocean? Assessing the intensity of anthropogenic marine activities in British Columbia, Canada. Aquat. Conserv.-Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 2008, 18:55-85.
5. Barnes C., McFadden K.W. Marine ecosystem approaches to management: challenges and lessons in the United States. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:387-392.
6. Basset A., Los W. Biodiversity e-Science: LifeWatch, the European infrastructure on biodiversity and ecosystem research. Plant Biosyst. 2012, 146(4):780-782.
7. Bik H.M., Porazinska D.L., et al. Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. TREE 2012, 1485.
8. Borja A., Elliott M. Marine monitoring during an economic crisis: the cure is worse than the disease. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 68:1-3.
9. Borja A., Bricker S.B., Dauer D.M., Demetriades N.T., Ferreira J.G., Forbes A.T., Hutchings P., Jia X., Kenchington R., Marques J.C., Zhu C. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56:1519-1537.
10. Borja Á., Elliott M., Carstensen J., Heiskanen A.-S., van de Bund W. Marine management - towards an integrated implementation of the European marine strategy framework and the water framework directives. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60:2175-2186.
11. Borja Á., Galparsoro I., Irigoien X., Iriondo A., Menchaca I., Muxika I., Pascual M., Quincoces I., Revilla M., Germán Rodríguez J., Santurtún M., Solaun O., Uriarte A., Valencia V., Zorita I. Implementation of the European marine strategy framework directive: a methodological approach for the assessment of environmental status, from the Basque Country (Bay of Biscay). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62:889-904.
12. Bricker S., Longstaff B., Dennison W., Jones A., Boicourt K., Wicks C., Woerner J. Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation's Estuaries: A Decade of Change NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis, Series No. 26 2007, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, p. 328.
13. Cameron S., Rubinoff D., et al. Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost?. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55(5):844-847.
14. Cardoso A.C., Cochrane S., Doemer H., Ferreira J.G., Galgani F., Hagebro C., Hanke G., Hoepffner N., Keizer P.D., Law R., Olenin S., Piet G.J., Rice J., Rogers S.I., Swartenbroux F., Tasker M.L., van de Bund W. Scientific support to the European Commission on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Management Group Report. EUR 24336 EN - Joint Research Centre 2010, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p. 57.
15. Carreon-Martinez L., Johnson T.B., et al. Utilization of stomach content DNA to determine diet diversity in piscivorous fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2011, 78(4):1170-1182.
16. Carvalho R.N., Bopp S.K., et al. Transcriptomics responses in marine diatom thalassiosira pseudonana exposed to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon benzo[a]pyrene. Plos One 2011, 6(11).
17. Carvalho R.N., Burchardt A.D., et al. Gene biomarkers in diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated marine surface sediments. Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 101(1):244-253.
18. CBD, 2000. Ecosystem Approach. Fifth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biodiversity. Nairobi, Kenya, 2000. http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/cop5/.
19. Check E. Treasure Island: pinning down a model ecosystem. Nature 2006, 439(7075):378-379.
20. Claudet J., Fraschetti S. Human-driven impacts on marine habitats: a regional meta-analysis in the Mediterranean Sea. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:2195-2206.
21. Cochrane S.K.J., Connor D.W., Nilsson P., Mitchell I., Reker J., Franco J., Valavanis V., Moncheva S., Ekebom J., Nygaard K., Serrao Santos R., Naberhaus I., Packeiser T., van de Bund W., Cardoso A.C. Marine Strategy Framework Directive - Task Group 1 Report Biological Diversity. EUR 24337 EN - Joint Research Centre 2010, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p. 110.
22. Cook C.E., Mostovski M.B. 16S mitochondrial sequences associate morphologically dissimilar males and females of the family Phoridae (Diptera). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 2002, 77(2):267-273.
23. Davies, N., Field, D., et al., in press. Report of the 14th Genomic Standards Consortium Meeting, Oxford, UK, September 17-21, 2012. Standards in Genomic Sciences.
24. Davies N.D., Field and Genomic Observatories Network Genomic observatories network: sequencing data: a genomic network to monitor earth. Nature 2012, 481(7380):145.
25. De Jonge V.N., Elliott M., Brauer V.S. Marine monitoring: its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2006, 53:5-19.
26. DeLong E.E. Microbial community genomics in the ocean. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3(6):459-469.
27. Doucette G.J., Mikulski C.M., et al. Remote, subsurface detection of the algal toxin domoic acid onboard the environmental sample processor: assay development and field trials. Harmful Algae 2009, 8(6):880-888.
28. Ehler, C., Douvere, F., 2009. Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. In: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. Paris: UNESCO. p. 99.
29. Elliott M. Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures - a numbered guide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62:651-655.
30. Faith D.P., Baker A.M. Phylogenetic diversity (PD) and biodiversity conservation: some bioinformatics challenges. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2006, 2:121-128.
31. Faith D.P., Lozupone C., Nipperess D., Knight R. The cladistic basis for the phylogenetic diversity (PD) measure links evolutionary features to environmental gradients and supports broad applications of microbial ecology's "phylogenetic beta diversity" framework. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:4723-4741.
32. Falciani F., Diab A.M., et al. Hepatic transcriptomic profiles of European flounder (Platichthys flesus) from field sites and computational approaches to predict site from stress gene responses following exposure to model toxicants. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 90(2):92-101.
33. Field D., Amaral-Zettler L., et al. The genomic standards consortium. Plos Biol. 2011, 9(6).
34. Frolov S., Kudela R.M., Bellingham J.G. Monitoring of harmful algal blooms in the era of diminishing resources: a case study of the U.S. West Coast. Harmful Algae 2013, 21-22:1-12.
35. Garcia-Reyero N., Adelman I., et al. Gene expression profiles of fathead minnows exposed to surface waters above and below a sewage treatment plant in Minnesota. Mar. Environ. Res. 2008, 66(1):134-136.
36. Gilbert, J.A., Meyer, F., et al., 2010. The earth microbiome project: meeting report of the "1st emp meeting on sample selection and acquisition" at Argonne National Laboratory October 6th 2010. Standards in Genomic Science 3:3.
37. Gilbert, J., Bailey, M., et al., 2011. The earth microbiome project: the meeting report for the 1st international earth microbiome project conference, Shenzhen, China, June 13th-15th 2011. Standards in Genomic Science 5(2).
38. Glöckner, F.O., et al., 2012. Marine microbial diversity and its role in ecosystem functioning and environmental change NPG Scientific Reports 2(536). p. 8. ESF Marine Board Position Paper, 17. Marine Board-ESF: Ostend. ISBN 978-2-918428-71-8. p. 80.
39. Griffith J.F., Weisberg F.B. Challenges in implementing new technology for beach water quality monitoring: lessons from a California demonstration project. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2011, 45(2):65-73.
40. Hajibabaei M. The barcode of life initiative. J. Phycol. 2007, 43. pp. 20-20.
41. Hajibabaei M., Shokralla S., Zhou X., Singer G.A.C., Baird D.J. Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS One 2011, 6:e17497. .
42. Halpern B.S., Walbridge S., Selkoe K.A., Kappel C.V., Micheli F., D'Agrosa C., Bruno J.F., Casey K.S., Ebert C., Fox H.E., Fujita R., Heinemann D., Lenihan H.S., Madin E.M.P., Perry M.T., Selig E.R., Spalding M., Steneck R., Watson R. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 2008, 319:948-952.
43. Hardisty A., Roberts D. A decadal view of biodiversity informatics: challenges and priorities. BMC Ecol. 2013, (in press).
44. Hebert P.D.N., Ratnasingham S., et al. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 2003, 270:S96-S99.
45. Heid C.A., Stevens J., et al. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996, 6(10):986-994.
46. Heip, C., McDonough, N., 2012. Marine Biodiversity: A Science Roadmap for Europe. Marine Board Future Science Brief 1, European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. ISBN: 978-2-918428-75-6.
47. HELCOM, 2010. Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea 2003-2007: HELCOM Initial Holistic Assessment. In: Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings, 122. p. 68.
48. Helyar S.J., Hemmer-Hansen J., et al. Application of SNPs for population genetics of nonmodel organisms: new opportunities and challenges. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:123-136.
49. Karsenti E., Acinas S.G., et al. A holistic approach to marine eco-systems biology. Plos Biol. 2011, 9(10).
50. Krishnamurthy P.K., Francis R.A. A critical review on the utility of DNA barcoding in biodiversity conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012, 21:1901-1919.
51. Leonardsson K., Blomqvist M., Rosenberg R. Theoretical and practical aspects on benthic quality assessment according to the EU-Water Framework Directive - examples from Swedish waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2009, 58(9):1286-1296.
52. Leray, M., Boehm, J.T., et al., 2012. Moorea BIOCODE barcode library as a tool for understanding predator prey interactions. Coral Reefs.
53. Lester S.E., McLeod K.L., Tallis H., Ruckelshaus M., Halpern B.S., Levin P.S., Chavez F.P., Pomeroy C., McCay B.J., Costello C., Gaines S.D., Mace A.J., Barth J.A., Fluharty D.L., Parrish J.K. Science in support of ecosystem-based management for the US West Coast and beyond. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:576-587.
54. Lettieri T. Recent applications of DNA microarray technology to toxicology and ecotoxicology. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114(1):4-9.
55. Lewis, J., Medlin, L.K., et al., 2012. MIDTAL (Microarrays For The Detection Of Toxic Algae): A Protocol For A Successful Microarray Hybridisation And Analysis, Gantner, A.R.
56. Lotze H.K. Historical reconstruction of human-induced changes in U.S. estuaries. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 2010, 48:267-338.
57. Mardis E.R. The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet. 2008, 24(3):133-141.
58. McDonald D., Vaizquez-Baeza Y., Walters W.A., Caporaso J.G., Knight R. From molecules to dynamic biological communities. Biol. Philos. 2013, 28:241-259.
59. Minster, J.F., Connolly, N., 2006. Navigating the Future - III Updated Synthesis of Perspectives on Marine Science and Technology in Europe. European Science Foundation, Position Paper 8. p. 71.
60. Montgomery S.B., Sammeth M., Gutierrez-Arcelus M., et al. Transcriptome genetics using second generation sequencing in a Caucasian population. Nature 2010, 464:773-777.
61. Nielsen E.E., Cariani A., et al. Gene-associated markers provide tools for tackling illegal fishing and false eco-certification. Nature Commun. 2012, 3.
62. Pew Oceans Commission America's Living Oceans: Charting a Course for Sea Change. Summary Report 2003, Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia, p. 40.
63. Radom M., Rybarczyk A., Kottmann R., Formanowicz P., Szachniuk M., Glöckner F.O., Rebholz-Schuhmann D., Blazewicz J. Poseidon: an information retrieval and extraction system for metagenomic marine science. Ecol. Inform. 2012, 12:10-15.
64. Roger F., Godhe A., et al. Genetic diversity and ecosystem functioning in the face of multiple stressors. Plos One 2012, 7(9).
65. Scholin C.A. What are "ecogenomic sensors?" A review and thoughts for the future. Ocean Sci. 2010, 6:51-60.
66. Shrestha R.P., Tesson B., et al. Whole transcriptome analysis of the silicon response of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. BMC Genomics 2012, 13.
67. Smith M.A., Fisher B.L. Invasions, DNA barcodes, and rapid biodiversity assessment using ants of Mauritius. Front. Zool. 2009, 6:31.
68. Taberlet P., Coissac E., et al. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21(8):2045-2050.
69. Teeling H., Glockner F.O. Current opportunities and challenges in microbial metagenome analysis-a bioinformatic perspective. Briefings Bioinform. 2012, 13(6):728-742.
70. UNCLOS, 1982. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, on 10 December 1982. p. 202. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm.
71. Zhou X., Adamowicz S.J., et al. Towards a comprehensive barcode library for arctic life - Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Front. Zool. 2009, 6:30.
72. Zhou X., Li Y., et al. Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification. GigaScience 2013, 2(1):4.