Dynamical systems modeling of physiological coregulation in dyadic interactions

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 296-308

  Ferrer, Emilio ^a   Helm, Jonathan L ^a  

^a University of California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomic nervous system; Dyadic interactions; Dynamical systems; Emotion; Methodology; Psychophysiology; Relationships

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BREATHING; DYADIC INTERACTION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884151013     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allen J.B., Chambers A.S., Towers D.N. The many metrics of cardiac chronotropy: a pragmatic primer and a brief comparison of metrics. Biological Psychology 2007, 74:243-262.
2. Amemiya T. The Maximum Likelihood estimator and the nonlinear Three-Stage Least Squares estimator in the general nonlinear simultaneous equation model. Econometrica 1977, 45:955-968.
3. Beckes L., Coan J.A. Social baseline theory: the role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2011, 5:976-988.
4. Berntson G.G., Quigley K.S., Lozano D. Cardiovascular Psychophysiology. Handbook of Psychophysiology 2007, 182-210. Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Eds.).
5. Boker S.M. Differential structural equation modeling of intraindividual variability. New Methods for the Analysis of Change 2001, 3-28. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L. Collins, A. Sayer (Eds.).
6. Boker S.M., Laurenceau J.P. Dynamical systems modeling: an application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure. Models for intensive longitudinal data 2006, 195-218. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY. T.A. Walls, J.L. Schafer (Eds.).
7. Boker S.M., Neale M., Rausch J.R. Latent differential equation modeling with multivariate multi-occasion indicators. Recent Developments on Structural Equation Models: Theory and Applications 2004, 151-174. Kluwer, Amsterdam. K. van Montfort, J. Oud, A. Satorra (Eds.).
8. Boker S.M., Deboeck P.R., Edler C., Keel P.K. Generalized local linear approximation of derivatives from time series. Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue 2010, 179-212. Taylor and Francis, New York. S.-M. Chow, E. Ferrer, F. Hsieh (Eds.).
9. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. Attachment 1969, vol. 1. Basic, New York.
10. Butler E.A. Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the "TIES" that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2011, 15:367-393.
11. Butler, E.A., Randall, A.K., in press. Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review.
12. Butner J., Diamond L.M., Hicks A.M. Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships 2007, 14:431-455.
13. Cacioppo J.T., Tassinary L.G., Berntson G. Handbook of Psychophysiology 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Rev. ed.
14. Champagne F.A. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 2008, 29:386-397.
15. Chow S.-M., Ferrer E., Nesselroade J.R. An unscented Kalman filter approach to the estimation of nonlinear dynamical systems models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:283-321.
16. Diamond L.M., Hicks A.M., Otter-Henderson K.D. Every time you go away: changes in affect, behavior, and physiology associated with travel-related separations from romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:385-403.
17. Feldman R., Magori-Cohen R., Galili G., Singer M., Louzoun Y. Mother and infant coordinate heart rhythms through episodes of interaction synchrony. Infant Behavior & Development 2011, 34:569-577.
18. Felmlee D.H. Application of Dynamic Systems Analysis to Dyadic Interactions. Handbook of methods in positive psychology 2006, 409-422. Oxford University Press. A.D. Ong, M. van Dulmen (Eds.).
19. Felmlee D.H., Greenberg D.F. A Dynamic Systems Model of Dyadic Interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1999, 23:155-180.
20. Ferrer E., Nesselroade J.R. Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations via dynamic factor analysis. Emotion 2003, 3:344-360.
21. Ferrer E., Steele J. Dynamic systems analysis of affective processes in dyadic interactions using differential equations. Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences 2012, 111-134. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC. G.R. Hancock, J.R. Harring (Eds.).
22. Ferrer E., Widaman K.F. Dynamic Factor Analysis of Dyadic Affective Processes with Inter-group Differences. Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences 2008, 107-137. Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ. N.A. Card, J.P. Selig, T.D. Little (Eds.).
23. Gallant A.R., Holly A. Statistical inference in an implicit, nonlinear, simultaneous equation model in the context of Maximum Likelihood estimation. Econometrica 1980, 48:697-720.
24. Gottman J.M. Time-series analysis applied to physiological data. Principles of Psychophysiology: Physical, Social, and Inferential Elements 1990, 754-774. Cambridge University Press, New York. J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary (Eds.).
25. Gottman J.M., Murray J.D., Swanson C.C., Tyson R., Swanson K.R. The Mathematics of Marriage: Dynamic Nonlinear Models 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.
26. Gottman J.M., Swanson C.C., Swanson K.R. A general systems theory of marriage: nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2002, 6:326-340.
27. Hamaker E.L., Zhang Z., van der Maas H.I.J. Using threshold autoregressive models to study dyadic interactions. Psychometrika 2009, 74:727-745.
28. Hassler B.P., Mehl M.R., Bootzin R.R., Vazire S. Preliminary evidence of diurnal rhythms in everyday behaviors associated with positive affect. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42:1537-1546.
29. Helm J., Sbarra D.A., Ferrer E. Assessing cross-partner associations of physiological responses via coupled oscillator models. Emotion 2012, 12:748-762.
30. Hofer M.A. Relationships as regulators: a psychobiological perspective on bereavement. Psychosomatic Medicine 1984, 46:183-197.
31. Kot M. Elements of Mathematical Ecology 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
32. Madhyastha T.M., Hamaker E.L., Gottman J.M. Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology 2011, 25:292-300.
33. McAssey M., Helm J., Hsieh F., Sbarra D.A., Ferrer E. Recent developments in methodology for detecting physiological synchrony during dyadic interactions. Methodology 2012, 10.1027/1614-2241/a000053.
34. McClintock M. Menstrual synchrony and suppression. Foundations of Animal Behavior: Classic Papers with Commentaries 1996, 229:438.
35. Molenaar P.C.M. A manifesto of psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement 2004, 2(4):201-218.
36. Molenaar P.C.M., Raymakers M.R.J. Fitting nonlinear dynamical models directly to observed time series. Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling 1998, 269-297. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. K.M. Newell, P.C.M. Molenaar (Eds.).
37. Oud J.H.L. SEM state space modeling of panel data in discrete and continuous time and its relationship to traditional state space modeling. Recent developments on structural equation models: theory and applications 2004, 13-40. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. K. Van Montfort, J. Oud, A. Satorra (Eds.).
38. Oud J.H.L., Singer H. Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques. Statistica Neerlandica 2008, 62:4-28.
39. Oud J.H.L., Delsing M.J.M.H. Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Longitudinal research with latent variables 2010, 201-244. Springer, Heidelberg. K. van Montfort, J.H.L. Oud, A. Satorra (Eds.).
40. Oud J.H.L., Folmer H. Reply to Steele & Ferrer: modeling oscillation, approximately or exactly?. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2011, 46:986-994.
41. Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts 1981, McGraw-Hill, New York. Second edition.
42. Rey J.M. A mathematical model of sentimental dynamics accounting for marital dissolution. PLoS One 2010, 5(3):e9881.
43. Rosenblatt J.S. The Basis of Synchrony in the Behavioral Interaction Between the Mother and Her Offspring in the Laboratory Rat. Determinants of infant behavior 1965, 3-45. Methuen, London. B.M. Foss (Ed.).
44. Sbarra D.A., Hazan C. Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: an integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:141-167.
45. Steele, J., 2011. The modeling of dyadic interactions using deterministic and stochastic differential equations. Unpublished Dissertation. University of California, United States.
46. Steele J., Ferrer E. Latent differential equation modeling of self-regulatory and coregulatory affective processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2011, 46:956-984.
47. Steele J., Ferrer E. Randomness and residuals: a reply to Oud and Folmer's critique. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2011, 46:994-1003.
48. Steele, J., Nesselroade, J.R., Ferrer, E., submitted for publication. An idiographic approach to estimating models of dyadic interactions with differential equations.
49. Steenbeek H.W., van Geert P.L.C. A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context. Developmental Review 2007, 27:1-40.
50. Thatcher R.W. A predator-prey model of human cerebral development. Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling 1998, 87-128. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. K.M. Newell, P.C.M. Molenaar (Eds.).
51. von Oertzen T., Boker S. Time delay embedding increases estimation precision of models of intraindividual variability. Psychometrika 2010, 75:158-175.