Erratum: Twitter classification model: The ABC of two million fitness tweets (Translational Behavioral Medicine DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0209-0);Twitter classification model: The ABC of two million fitness tweets

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 304-311

  Vickey, Theodore A ^a   Ginis, Kathleen Martin ^b   Dabrowski, Maciej ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mobile fitness apps; Online social network; Physical activity; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXERCISE; FITNESS; HEALTH; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL NETWORK; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84884148057     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby033     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Foster D, Linehan C, Kirman B, et al. Motivating physical activity at work: using persuasive social media for competitive step counting. 14th MindTrek Conference, 6th-8th October, Tampere, Finland.
2. Nigg CR. Technology's influence on physical activity and exercise science: the present and the future. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4(1): 57-65.
3. Ranck J. Connected Health: How Mobile Phones, Cloud and Big Data Will Reinvent Healthcare. San Francisco, CA: GigaOM Books; 2012.
4. Dolan B. 13K iPhone consumer health apps in 2012. mobihealthNews. 2012. http://mobihealthnews. com/13368/report-13k-iphone-consumer-health-apps-in-2012/. Accessed 24 Aug 2012.
5. Patrick K, Intille SS, Zabinski MF. An ecological framework for cancer communication: implications for research. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(3): e23.
6. West JH, Hall PC, Hanson CL, et al. There's an app for that: content analysis of paid health and fitness apps. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3): e72.
7. Vickey T. Social Capital and the Role of LinkedIn to Form, Develop and Maintain Irish Entrepreneurial Business Networks. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2011. http://www. c-s-p. org/flyers/Social-Capital-and-the-Role-of-LinkedIn-to-Form--Develop-and-Maintain-Irish-Entrepreneurial-Business1-4438-2904-8. htm. Accessed 24 Aug 2012.
8. Jansen BJ, Zhang M. Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2009;60(11): 2169-2188.
9. Bruns A, Burgess J. The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. 6th Eur Consort Polit Res Gen Conf. 2011;64: 1-9.
10. Cheong M, Ray S. A literature review of recent microblogging developments. Technical report. (p. 43). Victoria, Australia, 2001. http://www. csse. monash. edu. au/publications/2011/tr-2011-263-full. pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2012.
11. Java A, Song X, Finin T. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop '07. 2007. http://portal. acm. org/citation. cfm?id=1348556. Accessed 21 Aug 2012.
12. Vega E, Parthasarathy R. Where are my tweeps?: Twitter usage at conferences. Paper, Personal Information. 2010; pp 1-6. http://www. socialcouch. com/demos/final_paper_twitter. pdf. Accessed 5 July 2012.
13. Naaman M, Boase J, Lai C. Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: CSCW '10 Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York: NY: ACM; 2010;189-192.
14. Bennett S. Twitter now seeing 400 million tweets per day, increased mobile ad revenue, says CEO. All Twitter-The Unofficial Twitter Resource. 2012. http://www. mediabistro. com/alltwitter/twitter-400-million-tweets_b23744. Accessed 3 Sep 2012.
15. Miller C. Finding utility in the jumble of tweeted thoughts. New York Times. 2009. http://www. nytimes. com/2009/04/14/technology/internet/14twitter. html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 3 Sep 2012.
16. Vitale D, Ferragina P, Scaiella, M. Classification of short texts by deploying topical annotations. In: Baeza-Yates, R, de Vries, AP, Zaragoza, H, Cambazoglu, BB, Murdock, V, Lempel, R, Silvestri, F, eds. Advances in Information Retrieval: 34th European Conferences on IR Research ECIR 2012, Barcelona, Spain, April 1-5, 2012, Proceedings. Vol. 7224. New York, NY: Springer; 2012: 376-387.
17. Chakrabarti S, Ester M, Fayyad U, et al. Data mining curriculum: a proposal. Intensive Working Group of ACM SIGKDD Curriculum Committee. 2006.
18. Dann S. Twitter content classification. First Monday. 2010;15(12): 1-11. http://firstmonday. org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index. php/fm/article/view/2745/2681. Accessed 24 August 2012.
19. Kelly R. Twitter Study-August 2009 Introduction. San Antonio, TX: Pear Analytics; 2009: 2011.
20. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory method: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13: 3-21.
21. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86: 420-3428.
22. Merriam-Webster. Blarney-definition and more from the Merriam-Webster Free Dictionary. Merriam-Webster Free Dictionary. 2012.
23. Heil, B, Piskorski, M. HBR Blog Network: New Twitter research: men follow men and nobody tweets. Harvard Business Review (June 1, 2009). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Publishing; 2009. http://blogs. hbr. org/cs/2009/06/new_twitter_research_men_follo. html. Accessed 6 June 2012.