Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 776-786

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Gottfredson, Ryan K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649460011     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.686     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. NY: Guilford.
2. Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94-107.
3. Aguinis, H., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2001). A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effects of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 291-323.
4. Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (in press). Revival of test bias research in reemployment testing. Journal of Applied Psychology.
5. Aguinis, H., Petersen, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (1999). Appraisal of the homogeneity of error variance assumption and alternatives to multiple regression for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 315-339.
6. Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (1998). Heterogeneity of error variance and the assessment of moderating effects of categorical variables: A conceptual review. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 296-314.
7. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., & Muslin, I. S., (2009). First decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 69-112.
8. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., & Culpepper, S. A. (2009). Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact: Correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 623-652.
9. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
10. Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J. L., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2009). Customer-centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1094428109333339
11. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Alexander, R. A., & DeShon, R. P. (1994). Effect of error variance heterogeneity on the power of tests for regression slope differences. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 308-314.
13. Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549-562.
14. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062-1081.
15. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Culpepper, S. A., & Aguinis, H. (2010). R is for revolution: A cutting-edge, free, open source statistical package. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1094428109355485
17. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Jaccard, J. J. (2001). teraction effects in logistic regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. O'Connor, B. P. (1998). All-in-one programs for exploring interactions in moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 833-837.
20. Oldham, G. R., Hackman, J. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 395-403.
21. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
22. Russell, C. J., & Bobko, P. (1992). Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse for comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 336-342.
23. Shieh, G. (2009). Detecting interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous variables: Power and sample size considerations. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 510-528.
24. Stone-Romero, E. F., & Anderson, L. E. (1994). Techniques for detecting moderating effects: Relative statistical power of multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup-based correlation coefficients. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 354-359.