A notation for Knowledge-Intensive Processes

Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 190-195

  Netto, J M ^a   Franca, J B S ^b   Baiao, F A ^b   Santoro, F M ^b  

^a Federal Service of Data Processing SERPRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Knowledge Intensive Process Ontolog; Knowledge Intensive Process Representation; Process Modeling

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; GRAPHICAL MODEL; GRAPHICAL NOTATION; KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE PROCESS; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROCESS MODELING;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84884130310     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSCWD.2013.6580961     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Abecker, A. : Business-Process Oriented Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methods and Tools. PhD thesis, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe. Germany (2004).
2. Abecker, A.; DECOR Consortium: DECOR-Delivery of contextsensitive organizational knowledge. E-Work and E-Commerce. IOS Press (2001).
3. Aalst, W. M. P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D. : Case Handling: A New Paradigm for Business Process Support. In Data and Knowledge Engineering, V. 53, N. 2, p. 129-162, (2005).
4. Bertin, J. : Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: University of Wisconsin Press (1983).
5. Buzan, T. : The Mind Map Book. 2nd edn., BBC Books: London (1995).
6. Cardoso, E. C. S.; Santos JR., P. S.; Almeida, J. P. A.; Guizzardi, R. S. S., Guizzardi, G. : Semantic Integration of Goal and Business Process Modeling. In International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Brasil (2010).
7. Di Ciccio, C., Catarci, T., Mecella, M. : Representing and visualizing mined artful processes in MailOfMine. In: Proceedings of the 7th conference on Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, p. 83-94, Germany(2011).
8. Di Ciccio, C. Marrella, A. Russo, A. : Knowledge-intensive Processes: An Overview of Contemporary Approaches. In: International workshop on Knowledge-intense Business Processes, p. 32-47, Italy, (2012).
9. Donadel, A. C. : A method for representing knowledge-intensive processes. MSc Dissertation. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil (2007) (In Portuguese).
10. Eppler, M. J.; Seifried, P. M.; Ropnack, A. : Improving Knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research. p. 222-230, USA (1999).
11. Eriksson, H.-E.; Penker, M. Business Modeling with UML: Business patterns at work. E. U. A. : John Wiley and Sons (2000).
12. Figl, K., Derntl, M. : The Influence of Cognitive Effectiveness on Perceived Usefulness of Visual Conceptual Modeling Languages. 30th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, p. 78-91, Belgium (2011).
13. França, J. B. S., Santoro, F. M., Baião, F. A. : Towards Characterizing Knowledge Intensive Processes. In International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work in Design, v. 113, p. 497-504, China (2012a).
14. França, J. B. S., Netto, J. M., Carvalho, J. E. S., Baião, F. A., Santoro, F. M., Pimentel, M. : An Exploratory Study on Collaboratively Conceptualizing Knowledge Intensive Processes. In International Conference on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support, p. 46-60, Polônia, (2012b).
15. França, J. B. S., Netto, J. M., Barradas, R. G., Baião, F. A., Santoro, F. M. : Towards Knowledge-Intensive Processes Representation. In International Workshop on Business Process Design. Estonia. (2012c).
16. Gronau, N.; Muller, C.; Korf, R. : KMDL-Capturing, analyzing and improving knowledge intensive business process. Journal of Universal Computer Science, v. 11, n. 4, p. 452-472 (2005).
17. Hagen, C. R.; Ratz, D.; Povalej, R. : Towards self-organizing knowledge intensive processes. Journal of universal knowledge management, v. 0, n. 2, p. 148-169 (2005).
18. Hildebrandt, T. T., Mukkamala, R. R. : Declarative event-based workflow as distributed dynamic condition response graphs. In: Programming Languages Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-cEntric Software, p. 59-73, Cyprus (2010).
19. Hill, C., Yates, R., Jones, C., Kogan, S. L. : Beyond predictable workflows: Enhancing productivity in artful business processes. IBM Syst. J. v. 45, n. 4, p. 663-682 (2006).
20. Korherr, B., List, B. : A UML 2 Profile for Event Driven Process Chains, Proceedings of International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Springer-Verlag (2006).
21. Korherr, B., List, B. : Extending the epc and the bpmn with business goals and performance measures. In: http://www. wit. at/people/korherr/ publications/iceis2007. pdf Accessed in: 09-23-2011.
22. Man, H. : Case Management: A Review of Modeling Approaches. In BPTrends, January (2009).
23. Moody, D. : The physics of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering v. 35, n. 6, p. 756-779 (2009).
24. Oliveira, F. F. : A Collaboration Ontology and its Applications. MSc Dissertation. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil. (2009) (In Portuguese).
25. OMG: Business Process Modeling and Notation (BPMN). Version 2. 0 (2011). In: http://www. bpmn. org/ Accessed in: 06-26-2011.
26. Papavassiliou, G.; Ntioudis, S.; Abecker, A.; Mentzas, G. : Business Process Knowledge Modeling: method tool. Database and Expert Systems Applications, p. 138-142, Greece (2002).
27. Papavassiliou, G.; Ntioudis, S.; Abecker, A.; Mentzas, G. : Managing Knowledge in Weakly Structured Administrative Process. In Third European Conference on Organization Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Greece (2002).
28. Rao, A. S.; Georgeff, M. P. BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. In First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, p. 312-319, USA (1995).
29. Schreiber, G. Akkermans, H.; Anjewierden, A.; Hoog, R.; Shadbolt, N.; De Velde, W. V.; Wielinga, B. : Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methedology. MIT Press: Cambridge (2002).
30. Wang, J. and Kumar, A., A Framework for Document-Driven Workflow Systems. In Third International Conference on Business Process Management, p. 285-301, France (2005).
31. Yu, E. : Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering, In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering p. 226-235, USA (1997).