Applied English Phonology, Second Edition

Applied English Phonology, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Yavaş, Mehmet ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884113183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444392623     Document Type: Book

References (135)

1. Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., and Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics 32: 233-50.
2. Archangeli, D. (1999). Introducing Optimality Theory. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 531-52.
3. Avery, P. and Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bailey, C.-J. N. (1983). A concise but comprehensive approach to intonation for learners of English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 8 (3): 3-27.
5. Ball, M. and Lowry, O. (2001). Methods in Clinical Phonetics. London: Whurr.
6. Baptista, B. and DaSilva Filho, J. (1997). The infl{ligature}uence of markedness and syllable contact on the production of English fi{ligature}nal consonants by EFL learners. In J. Leather and A. James (eds.), New Sounds 97: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 26-34). Klagenfurt: University of Klagenfurt.
7. Beland, R., Caplan, D., and Nespoulous, J. L. (1990). The role of abstract phonological representation in word production: evidence from phonemic paraphasias. Journal of Neurolinguistics 5: 125-64.
8. Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research (pp. 167-200). Timonium, MD: York Press.
9. Best, C. T. and Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception on approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20: 305-30.
10. Blumstein, S. (1978). Segment structure and the syllable in aphasia. In A. Bell and J. B. Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments (pp. 189-200). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Bohn, O. S. and Flege, J. E. (1990). Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners. In J. Leather and A. James (eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 37-56). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
12. Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its Uses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Bolinger, D. (1998). Intonation in American English. In D. Hirst and A. DiCristo (eds.), Intonation Systems (pp. 45-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bowen, J. D. (1975). Patterns of English Pronunciation. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
15. Broselow, E. (1993). Transfer and universals in second language epenthesis. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (pp. 71-86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Broselow, E. and Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research 7: 35-59.
17. Broselow, E., Chen, S., and Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20 (2): 261- 80.
18. Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 219-52.
19. Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6: 151-206.
20. Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49: 155-80.
21. Bucholtz, M. B. (1998). Geek the Girl: language, femininity, and female nerds. In N. Warner, J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, M. Oliver, S. Wertheim, and M. Chen (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 119-31). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
22. Bucholtz, M. B. (1999). Why be normal? Language and identity practices in a commun-ity of nerd girls. Language in Society 28 (2): 203-23.
23. Camarata, S. and Gandour, J. (1984). On describing idiosyncratic phonologic systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49: 262-6.
24. Carney, E. (1994). A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.
25. Carney, E. (1997). English Spelling. London: Routledge.
26. Carr, P. (1999). English Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
28. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., and Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching Pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Chin, S. (1996). The role of sonority hierarchy in delayed phonological systems. In T. W. Powell (ed.), Pathologies of Speech and Language: Contributions of Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics (pp. 109-17). New Orleans: International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association.
30. Christman, S. S. (1992). Uncovering phonological regularity in neologisms: contributions of sonority theory. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 6: 219-47.
31. Clark, J. and Yallop, C. (1995). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Code, C. and Ball, M. J. (1982). Fricative production in Broca's aphasia: a spectrographic analysis. Journal of Phonetics 10: 325-31.
33. Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Crystal, T. H. and House, A. S. (1982). Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72: 705-16.
35. Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing re-analyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11: 51-62.
36. Davenport, M. and Hannahs, S. J. (1998). Introducing Phonetics and Phonology. London: Arnold.
37. Davis, S. (1988). Topics in Syllable Geometry. New York: Garland.
38. de Jonge, C. E. (1996). Interlanguage phonology: perception and production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Dissertation Abstracts International. Publications number/order number: AAI9539993.
39. Dubois, S. and Horvath, B. (1998). Let's tink about dat: interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10: 245-61.
40. Dubois, S. and Horvath, B. (1999). When the music changes, you can change too: gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11: 287-313.
41. Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315-30.
42. Eckman, F. (1985). Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 23-41.
43. Eckman, F. and Iverson, G. (1994). Pronunciation diffi{ligature}culties in ESL: coda consonants in English interlanguage. In M. Yavas (ed.), First and Second Language Phonology (pp. 251-65). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
44. Eckman, F., Elreyes, A., and Iverson, G. (2003). Some principles of second language phono-logy. Second Language Research 19 (3): 169-208.
45. Ertmer, D. J. (2004). How well can children recognize speech features in spectrograms? Comparisons by age and hearing status. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 47: 484-95.
46. Ertmer, D. J. and Stark, R. E. (1995). Eliciting prespeech vocalization in a young child with profound hearing impairment: usefulness of real-time spectrographic displays. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 4: 22-38.
47. Ertmer, D. J., Stark, R. E., and Karlan, G. R. (1996). Real-time spectrographic displays in vowel production training with children who have profound hearing loss. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 5: 4-16.
48. Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of 'new' and 'similar' phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classifi{ligature}cation. Journal of Phonetics 15: 47-65.
49. Flege, J. E. (1990). English vowel production by Dutch talkers: more evidence for the 'similar' vs. 'new' distinction. In J. Leather and A. James (eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 255-93). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
50. Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in second language learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 395-411.
51. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: theory, fi{ligature}ndings, and problems. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Linguistic Research (pp. 233-77). Timonium, MD: York Press.
52. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., and Fox, R. A. (1994). Auditory and categorical effects on cross language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 3623-41.
53. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., and Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25: 437-70.
54. Fox, R. A., Flege, J. E., and Munro, M. J. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2540-51.
55. Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., Flege, J. E., and Sloane, M. E. (1999). Adults' perception of native and nonnative vowels: implications for the perceptual magnet effect. Perceptual Psychophysics 61: 561-77.
56. Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
57. Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27: 765-8.
58. Fry, D. B. (1979). The Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Giegerich, H. (1992). English Phonology. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
60. Hall, R. A. (1961). Sounds and Spelling in English. New York: Chilton Books.
61. Hammond, M. (1999). The Phonology of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Hansen, J. (2001). Linguistic constraints on the acquisition of English syllable codas by native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. Applied Linguistics 22: 338-65.
63. Hansen Edwards, J. G. and Zampini, M. L. (eds.) (2008). Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia; John Benjamins.
64. Hogg, R. and McCully, C. (1987). Metrical Phonology: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Jaeger, J. J. (1978). Speech aerodynamics and phonological universals. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 311-29.
66. Jenkins, J. (2002). World Englishes. London: Routledge.
67. Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London: Longman.
69. Kent, R. D. and Read, C. (1992). The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
70. Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English Pronunciation. London: Longman.
71. Kingston, J. (2003). Learning foreign vowels. Language and Speech 46 (2-3): 295-349.
72. Klatt, D. (1975). Voice onset time, frication and aspiration in word-initial consonant clus-ters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18: 686-706.
73. Kreidler, C. (2004). The Pronunciation of English (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
74. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a 'perceptual magnet effect' for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics 50 (2): 93-107.
75. Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: implications for theories of developmental speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 21: 125-39.
76. Kuhl, P. K. (2000). Language, mind, and brain: experience alters perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd edn.) (pp. 99-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., and Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606-8.
78. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
79. Ladefoged, P. (2001a). A Course in Phonetics (4th edn.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
80. Ladefoged, P. (2001b). Vowels and Consonants. Oxford: Blackwell.
81. Laeufer, C. (1996). The acquisition of complex phonological contrast: voice timing pat-terns of English initial stops by French native speakers. Phonetica 53: 86-110.
82. Lance, D. M. and Howie, S. M. (1994). Spectrographic analysis of English phonemes and allophones. In J. K. Kenyon, American Pronunciation (pp. 267-452). Ann Arbor, MI: Whurr.
83. Levy, E. (2004). Effects of language experience and consonantal context on perception of French front rounded vowels by adult American English learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. City University of New York - Graduate School and University Center.
84. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., and Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: the role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94: 1242-55.
85. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., and Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a fi{ligature}rst report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 874-86.
86. Lombardi, L. (2003). Second language data and constraints on manner: explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research 19 (3): 225-50.
87. McArthur, T. (1998). The English Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. McMahon, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89. Mack, M. (2003). The phonetic systems of bilinguals. In M. T. Banich and M. Mack (eds.), Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 309-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Major, R. C. (1987). English voiceless stop production by speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics 15: 197-202.
92. Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign Accent: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Second Language Phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
93. Major, R. C. and Kim, E. (1999). The similarity differential rate hypothesis. Language Learning 46: 465-96.
94. Maki, J. E. (1980). Visual feedback as an aid to speech therapy. In J. Subtelney (ed.), Speech Assessment and Speech Improvement for the Hearing-Impaired (pp. 167-76). Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Associates.
95. Maki, J. E. (1983). Application of the speech spectrographic display in developing articulatory skills in hearing-impaired adults. In I. Hochberg, H. Levitt, and M. J. Osberger (eds.), Speech of the Hearing-Impaired: Research, Training, and Personnel Preparation (pp. 297-312). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
96. Maki, J. E., Streff-Gustafson, M. S., Conklin, J. M., and Humphrey-Whitehead, B. K. (1981). The speech spectrographic display: interpretation of visual patterns by hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46: 379-87.
97. Mendoza-Denton, N. (1996). Language ideology and gang affi{ligature}liation among California Latina girls. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton, and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 478-86). Berkeley: University of California Press.
98. Munson, B., McDonald, E. C., Deboe, N. L., and White, A. R. (2006). The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgements of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics 34: 202-40.
99. Ohala, D. K. (1999). The infl{ligature}uence of sonority on children's cluster reductions. Journal of Communication Disorders 32: 397-422.
100. Oller, J. W. and Ziahosseyni, S. M. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis and spelling errors. Language Learning 20: 183-9.
101. Paolillo, J. (1995). Markedness in the acquisition of English /r/ and /l/. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, and R. Weber (eds.), Second Language Acquisition Theory and Pedagogy (pp. 275-91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102. Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
103. Peterson, G. E. and Barney, H. E. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24: 175-84.
104. Pickett, J. M. (1980). The Sounds of Speech Communication: A Primer of Acoustic Phonetics and Speech Perception. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
105. Pierrehumbert, J. B., Bent, T., Munson, B., Bradlow, A. R., and Bailey, J. M. (2004). The infl{ligature}uence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 1905-8.
106. Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., and Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identifi{ligature}cation and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology 8: 297-314.
107. Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 2961-77.
108. Port, R. F. and Rotunno, R. (1978). The relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66: 654-62.
109. Roach, P. (1991). English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Rochet, B. (1995). Perception and production of second language speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (pp. 379-410). Timonium, MD: York Press.
111. Rogers, H. (1991). Theoretical and Practical Phonetics. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.
112. Romani, C. and Calabrese, A. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language 64: 83-121.
113. Scovel, T. (1988). A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into Critical Period for Human Speech. New York: Harper & Row.
114. Selkirk, E. (1984). On major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aranoff and R. T. Oehrle (eds.), Language and Sound Structure: Studies in Phonology Presented to Morris Halle by his Teacher and Students (pp. 107-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
115. Sheldon, A. and Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede perception. Applied Psycholinguistics 3: 243-61.
116. Strand, E. A. and Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In D. Gibbon (ed.), Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology (pp. 14-26). Berlin: Mouton.
117. Strange, W., Bohn, O. S., Trent, S. A., and Nishi, K. (2004). Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115: 1791-1807.
118. Strange, W., Bohn, O. S., Nishi, K., and Trent, S. A. (2005). Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118: 1751-62.
119. Thurnburg, D. and Ryalls, J. (1998). Voice onset time in Spanish-English bilinguals: early versus late learners of English. Journal of Communication Disorders 31: 215-29.
120. Trudgill, P. and Hannah, J. (2002). International English (4th edn.). London: Edward Arnold.
121. Weismer, G. (1979). Sensitivity of voice-onset time (VOT) to certain segmental features in speech production. Journal of Phonetics 7: 197-204.
122. Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Werker, J. F. and Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorgnization during the fi{ligature}rst year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development 7: 49-63.
124. Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H., Humphrey, K., and Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development 52: 349-55.
125. Wolfram, W. and Johnson, R. (1982). Phonological Analysis: Focus on American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
126. Yavas, M. (1996). Differences in voice onset time in early and later Spanish-English bilinguals. In J. Jensen and A. Roca (eds.), Spanish in Contact: Issues in Bilingualism (pp. 151-61). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
127. Yavas, M. (1997). The effects of vowel height and place of articulation in interlanguage fi{ligature}nal stop devoicing. International Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 115-25.
128. Yavas, M. (1998). Phonology: Development and Disorders. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
129. Yavas, M. (2002). Voice onset time in bilingual phonological development. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, and N. Hewlett (eds.), Investigations in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics (pp. 341-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
130. Yavas, M. (2010). Acquisition of /s/-clusters in Spanish-English bilingual children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24 (3): 188-98.
131. Yavas, M. and J. Barlow (2006). Acquisition of #sC-clusters in Spanish-English bilin-gual children. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 4 (3): 182-93.
132. Yavas, M. and M. Someillan (2005). Patterns of acquisition of /s/-clusters in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3: 50-5.
133. Yavas, M., Ben-David, A., Gerrits, E., Kristoffersen, K. E., and Simonsen, H. G. (2008). Sonority and cross-linguistic acquisition of initial s-clusters. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22 (6): 421-41.
134. Zampini, M. L. (1998). The relationship between the production and perception of L2 Spanish stops. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education 3: 85-100.
135. Zampini, M. L. and Green, K. P. (2001). The voicing contrast in English and Spanish: the relationship between production and perception. In J. Nicol (ed.), Two Languages, One Mind: Language Processing in the Bilingual (pp. 23-48). Oxford: Blackwell.