Intellectual property rights and patents

Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 779-815

  Cockbain, J ^a  

^a Frank B Dehn and Co   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883970994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. The Times (International Edition), Aug 8, 2005, p 45.
2. Abrahams, M. IgNobel Prizes; Orion Books: London, UK, 2002.
3. Genentech Inc's Patent [1972] RPC 147.
4. Vaver, D., Ed. Intellectual Property in the New Millennium; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
5. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development Pegs Cost of New Prescription Mediáne at $802 Million, Press Release, 30 November, 2001.
6. Goozner, M. The $800 Million Pill; University of California Press, 2004.
7. Global Alliance for TB Drug Development. The Economics of TB Drug Development, 2001. http://www.tballiance.org (accessed April 2006)..
8. US. H.R. 417 The Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpdFbill=h109-417 (accessed April 2006)..
9. Maskus, K. E. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy; Institute for International Economics, 2000.
10. Granstrand, O., ed. Economics, Law and Intellectual Property; Kluwer, 2003.
11. Landes, W M. et al. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law; The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2003.
12. Scotchmer, S. Innovation and Incentives; MIT Press, 2004.
13. Sterckx, S. In Death of Patents; Drahos, ed.; Lawtext Publishing: Witney, UK, 2005; Chapter 6.
14. Fisher, M. I.PQ. 2004,85-113.
15. MacLeod, C. Inventing the Industrial Revolution. The English Patent System, 1660-1800; Cambridge University Press, 1988.
16. Gervais, D. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis, 2nd ed.; Sweet & Maxwell, 2003.
17. Pires de Carvalho, N. The TRIPS Regime of Patent Rights, 2nd ed.; Kluwer, 2005.
18. UNCTAD-ICTSD. Resource Book on TRIPS Development; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005.
19. Drahos, P. et al. Information Feudalism; Earthscan, 2002.
20. Sell, S. K. Private Power, Public Law; Cambridge University Press, 2003.
21. Blackstone, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA, 1765-1769; Vol. 2, p 346.
22. Diamond vs. Chakrabarty. 447 US 303, 1980. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.plPcourt=us&vol=447&invol=303 (accessed April 2006)..
23. The Holy Bible-New Revised Standard Version; Anglicized Edition; Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
24. EPO. Convention on the Grant of European Patents (European Patent Convention), 11th ed.; EPO: Munich, Germany, 2002.
25. Singer, M. et al. European Patent Convention, 3rd ed.; Carl Heymanns Verlag: Cologne, Germany, 2003.
26. Pila, J. 36 IIC 173-191 2005.
27. Kingston, W I.PQ. 2004, 369-378.
28. Silverman, R. AIPLA Q. J. 2005, 3, 153-187.
29. General Tire vs. Firestone [1972]. RPC 457. US. Title 35 of the United States Code. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode35/uscsup0135.html (accessed April 2006)..
30. James, L. S. In Death of Patents; Drahos, P. Ed.; Lawtext Publishing: Witney, UK, 2005; Chapter 3, 67-109.
31. Chisum, D. S. Chisum on Patents. A Treatise on the Law of Patentability; Matthew Bender: New York, 1997.
32. Eaton, P. E. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1964, 86, 3157.
33. Hook, E. 2004. http://www.chemsoc.org/exemplarchem/entries/2004a/Bristolhook/applications/index.html (accessed April 2006)..
34. USPTO. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, 8th Edn.; USPTO: Washington, DC, 2001.
35. EPO. Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office; EPO: Munich, Germany, 2003 (the 2005 edition of the EPO Guidelines is available on-line at http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/guilines/index.htm (accessed April 2006).).
36. CBD. Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992. http://www.biodiv.org/convention/default.shtml (accessed April 2006)..
37. EU. Directive 98j44 of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 6, 1998 on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions. OJ L 213, 30.7.1998, pp 13-21.
38. Kamstra, G. et al. Patents on Biotechnological Inventions: The EC Directive; Sweet & Maxwell, 2002.
39. Harvard. EPO Technical Board of Appeal Decision T0315/03 Transgenic Animals/HARVARD, 2005.
40. EU. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament.: Development and Implications of Patent Law in the Field of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Brussels, 14 July, 2005; COM(2005) 312 final; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium.
41. US. US Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 8' 2005. http://www.house.gov (accessed April 2006)..
42. WIPO. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property; WIPO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.
43. Penrose, E. T. The Economics of the International Patent System; The Johns Hopkins Press, 1951.
44. Bodenhausen, G. H. C. Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property; WIPO, 1969.
45. WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)\ WIPO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
46. WIPO. PCTNewsletter 2005, August, pp 11-24.
47. EU. European Communities No. 18; Convention for the European Patent for the Common Market (Community Patent Convention), Luxembourg, 15 December, 1975; HMSO: London, UK, 1976, Cmnd.6553.
48. SCRIP 15 June, 2005, p 2.
49. US. H.R. 2795 The Patent Reform Act of 2005. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpdFbill=h109-2795 (accessed April 2006)..
50. Geier, P. Bill in Congress to Overhaul Patent Law Seeks to Quell Suits. The National Law Journal, Aug 19, 2005.
51. Myers, G. Social Stud. Sei. 1995, 25, 57-105.
52. McSherry, C. Who Owns Academic Work?; Harvard University Press, 2001.
53. Bostyn, S. J. R. Enabling Biotechnological Inventions in Europe and the United States'; EPO, 2001.
54. Wegner, H. G. Patent Law in Biotechnology, Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals'; Stockton Press, 1992.
55. Jaenichen, H. R. et al. From Clones to Claims, 3rd ed.; Carl Heymanns Verlag: Cologne, Germany, 2002; Chapters 22 and 23, pp 493-517.
56. Lim, A. et al. I.PQ. 2005, 236-266.
57. UKPO. The CIPA Journal 2004, 125-129.
58. Phillips, J. Charles Dickens and the 'Poor Man's Tale of a Patent'; ESC Publishing: Oxford, UK, 1984, pp 15-21.
59. EPO. London Agreement on the Application of Article 65 EPC of 17 October 2000. OJ EPO 2001, 549-553.
60. Lemley, M. A. et al. Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations; George Mason University Law and Economics Working Paper No. 03-52, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 140, Virginia, US, 2003.
61. Morando, J. W. et al. Silent Enemies. Recorder, 4 May 1994, p 10.
62. NAFTA North American Free Trade Association. http://www-tech.mit.edu/Bulletins/nafta.html(also http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/DefaultSite/indexe.aspxFDetailID=168#A1709) (accessed April 2006)..
63. Salamolard, J. M. La Licence Obligatoire en Matiere de Brevets dlnvention'; Droz, 1978.
64. Vitoria, M. et al. Encyclopedia of United Kingdom and European Patent Law. Sweet, & Maxwell: London, UK, 1977-2006.
65. Ogilvy Renault. The CIPA Journal 2004, 474-475.
66. Walter, R. Anson's Voyage Round the World in the Years 1140-44'; Dover Publications, 1974.
67. Dutfield, G. et al. I.PQ. 2004; 379-421.
68. Lehman, B. A. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1st Session, 8 June and 1 November, 1995; US Government Printing House: Washington, DC, 1996, p 47.
69. Thompson, G. et al. Intellectual Property Rights and United States International Trade Laws'; Oceana Publications: Dobbs Ferry, NY, 2002, chapter XLVI and appendix C, pp 229-235 and 409-430.
70. SCRIP 13 May, 2005, p 18.
71. Cockbain, J. Global Outsourcing Rev. 2004, 6, 51-52.
72. US. Bayh-Dole Act, 37 C.F.R. 401, 2005. http://access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisid02/37cfr401_02.html.
73. Oxford. Statutes and Regulations of the University of Oxford, Statute XVI, Section 5. http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/statutes/790-121.shtml (accessed April 2006)..
74. UKPO. http://www.patent.gov.uk/patent/indetail/whomay.htm (accessed April 2006)..
75. Norway. Lov om retten til oppfinnelser som er gjort av arbeidstakere 1970-04-17 nr 0021, as amended by law 73 of 6 December, 2002, http://patentstyret.gazette.no/templates/Page295.aspx75. Shulman, S. Owning the Future; Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA, 1999, Chapters 6 and 7.
76. Monotti, A. L. et al. Universities and Intellectual Property'; OUP, 2003.
77. Janssens, M. C. Uitvindingen in Dienstverband met bijzondere Aandacht voor Uitvindingen aan Universitäten'; Bruylant, 1996.
78. Leistner, M. 35 IIC 859-872, 2004.
79. Nelson, R. R. I.PQ. 2001, 1-9.
80. Locke, J. Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration, 2nd Treatise; Shapiro, I. ed.; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, 2003, Chapter V.
81. Drahos, P. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property; Ashgate, 1996.
82. Priest, G. L. In Research in Law and Economics: Vol. 8: The Economics of Patents and Copyrights'; Palmer, J., Ed.; JAI Press, 1986, p 19.
83. EU. Proposal for a European Parliament, Council Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions, COM(88)496 final-SYN 159 of 17 October 1988, section 11, p 6.
84. Bentham, J. A Manual of Political Economy; Works of Jeremy Bentham; Bowring, J., Ed.; Tait: Edinburgh, UK, 1838-1843, p 1785.
85. Mill, J. S. Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy'; Longman Green: London, UK, 1871.
86. Lincoln, A. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln', Basler, R. P., Ed.; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 1953.
87. David, P A. In Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rightsin Science, ; Wallerstein, M., Ed.; National Academy Press, 1993, pp 19-61.
88. Mansfield, E. Manag. Sei. 1986, 32, 173-181.
89. Dutfield, G. Intellectual Property, Biogenetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge'; Earthscan: London, UK, 2004.
90. Heller, M. A. et al. Science 1998, 280, 698-701.
91. O'Gorman, E. The CIPA Journal 2004, 337-343.
92. SCRIP 20 July, 2005, p 2.
93. SCRIP 29 April, 2005, pp 2-3.
94. Improver. Improver vs. Remington (1990). FSR 181.
95. Festo. Festo Corp. vs. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S., 28 May, 2002.
96. Catnic. Catnic Components v. Hill & Smith [1982] RPC 183.
97. SCRIP 16 March, 2005, p 4.
98. EU. Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. Proposal for a Council Framework Decision to Strengthen the Criminal Law Framework to Combat Intellectual Property Offences, Brussels, 12 July, 2005; COM(2005)276 final; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium.
99. Gilat, D. Experimental Use and Patents; IIC Studies in Industrial Property and Copyright Law; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995, Vol. 16.
100. New Republic. The New Republic, 23 May, 1988.
101. Alexander, D. In Biotechnology, Patents and Morality, 2nd ed.; Sterckx, S., Ed.; Ashgate: Aldershot, UK, 2000; pp 255-256 and 310.
102. Myskja, B. K. Themoral difference between in tragenic, transgenic modification of plants. J. Agri. Environ. Ethics 2006, in press.
103. Stirling, A. In Science and Citizenship; Leach, M. et al., ed.; Zed Books: London, UK, 2005.
104. Harvard. EPO Technical Board of Appeal Decision T0019/90 Oncomouse/HARVARD. OJ EPO 1990, 476.
105. Jamieson, D. Morality's Progress; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 2002, pp 118-134.
106. Cornish, W. R. et al. Intellectual Property, 5th ed.; Sweet & Maxwell, 2003.
107. Jacob, R. et al. A Guidebook to Intellectual Property, 5th ed.; Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
108. UPOV. International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, 2005. http://www.upov.int/(accessed April 2006)..
109. UPOV. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants: What It Is, What It Does; UPOV Publication No. 437(E); UPOV: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
110. Van der Kooij, P. Introduction to the EC Regulation on Plant Variety Protection; Kluwer, 1997.