The attraction of yellow corn: Reduced attentional constraints on coding learned conjunctive relations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1016-1031

  Rappaport, Sarah J ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^b   Riddoch, M Jane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Color form conjunctions; Feature binding; Parallel processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; OCULOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECOGNITION; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883877533     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0032506     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Braun, J. (2003). Natural scenes upset the visual applecart. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 7-9.
2. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 3, 201-215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
3. Dent, K., Allen, H. A., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Inhibitory guidance in visual search: The case of movement-form conjunctions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 269-284.
4. Driver, J., McLeod, P., & Dienes, Z. (1992). Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 79-85. doi:10.3758/BF03205076
5. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
6. Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1476-1492. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1476
7. Humphreys, G. W., Cinel, C., Wolfe, J., Olson, A., & Klempen, N. (2000). Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form binding of surface features. Vision Research, 40, 1569-1596. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00042-0
8. Humphreys, G. W., Hodsoll, J., & Riddoch, M. J. (2009). Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence from reversed search efficiencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 627-647. doi:10.1037/a0013705
9. Iordanescu, L., Guzman-Martinez, E., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2008). Characteristic sound facilitates visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 548-554. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.548
10. Li, F. F., Van Rullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596-9601. doi:10.1073/pnas.092277599
11. Lu, A., Xu, G., Jin, H., Mo, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. X. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence for effects of color knowledge in object recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 469, 405-410. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.039
12. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154-155.
13. Moores, E., Laiti, L., & Chelazzi, L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 182-189. doi:10.1038/nn996
14. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
15. Ostergaard, A. L., & Davidoff, J. B. (1985). Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 579-587. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.579
16. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522.
17. Potter, M. C., & Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
18. Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 797-827.
19. Rappaport, S. J., Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Disruptive effects of diagnostic color at different levels of processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Reddy, L., Reddy, L., & Koch, C. (2006). Face identification in the near-absence of focal attention. Vision Research, 46, 2336-2343.
21. Reddy, L., Wilken, P., & Koch, C. (2004). Face- gender discrimination is possible in the near absence of attention. Journal of Vision, 4, 106-117.
22. Rust, N. C., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2010). Selectivity and tolerance ("invariance") both increase as visual information propagates from cortical area V4 to IT. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12978-12995. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0179-10.2010
23. Seymour, K., Clifford, C. W. G., Logothetis, N. K., & Bartels, A. (2009). The coding of color, motion, and their conjunction in the human visual cortex. Current Biology, 19, 177-183. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.050
24. Seymour, K., Clifford, C. W. G., Logothetis, N. K., & Bartels, A. (2010). Coding and binding of color and form in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1946-1954. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp265
25. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 555-586. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011
26. Telling, A. L., Kumar, S., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2212-2225. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21348
27. Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1295-1306. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0284
28. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285 (80)90005-5
29. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15
30. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459
31. Van Rullen, R. (2009). Binding hardwired vs. on-demand feature conjunctions. Visual Cognition, 17, 103-119. doi:10.1080/13506280802196451
32. Van Rullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2002). Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream. Vision Research, 42, 2593-2615. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00298-5
33. Walsh, V., Ashbridge, E., & Cowey, A. (1998). Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 36, 45-49. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97) 00111-5
34. Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., & Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495-500. doi:10.3758/BF03206946
35. Wolfe, J. (1994). Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
36. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419