Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal of Urology

Volumn 190, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1260-1267

  Li, Kaiwen ^a   Lin, Tianxin ^a   Zhang, Caixia ^a   Fan, Xinxiang ^a   Xu, Kewei ^a   Bi, Liangkuan ^a   Han, Jinli ^a   Huang, Hai ^a   Liu, Hao ^a   Dong, Wen ^a   Duan, Yu ^b   Yu, Min ^a   Huang, Jian ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

high energy shock waves; lithotripsy; meta analysis; review; urolithiasis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SHOCK WAVE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION; UROLITHIASIS;

EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; LITHOTRIPSY; META-ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RCT; REVIEW; SHOCK WAVE; SW; SWL; UROLITHIASIS;

HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; UROLITHIASIS;

EID: 84883827412     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.075     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. C. Chaussy, J. Schuller, and E. Schmiedt Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis Urology 23 1984 59
2. A. Skolarikos, G. Alivizatos, and J. de la Rosette Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention Eur Urol 50 2006 981
3. C.F. Ng, T.J. Thompson, and L. McLornan Single-center experience using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi J Endourol 20 2006 1
4. P. Larcher, O. De Cobelli, and L. Carmignani Prognostic parameters in extracorporeal lithotripsy Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl 61 1989 361
5. A. Greenstein, and H. Matzkin Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? Urology 54 1999 430
6. R.F. Paterson, R.L. Kuo, and J.E. Lingeman The effect of rate of shock wave delivery on the efficiency of lithotripsy Curr Opin Urol 12 2002 291
7. K.T. Pace, D. Ghiculete, and M. Harju Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial J Urol 174 2005 595
8. E. Yilmaz, E. Batislam, and M. Basar Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study Urology 66 2005 1160
9. W.M. Li, W.J. Wu, and Y.H. Chou Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy Urol Int 79 2007 124
10. R.J.D. Honey, T.D. Schuler, and D. Ghiculete A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones J Urol 182 2009 1418
11. K. Madbouly, A.M. El-Tiraifi, and M. Seida Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study J Urol 173 2005 127
12. K. Davenport, A. Minervini, and S. Keoghane Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi J Urol 176 2006 2055
13. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, and J. Tetzlaff The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 2009 b2700
14. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration
15. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.1 2011 The Nordic Cochrane Centre Copenhagen
16. S.P. Hozo, B. Djulbegovic, and I. Hozo Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample BMC Med Res Methodol 5 2005 13
17. M. Egger, G. Davey Smith, and M. Schneider Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 1997 629
18. E. Mazzucchi, A.H. Brito, and A. Danilovic Comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65 2010 961
19. S.H. Chang, J.H. Shon, and J.W. Lee Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment; prospective randomized study J Endourol 26 2012 A343
20. C.F. Ng, A.K. Lo, and K.W. Lee A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute J Urol 188 2012 837
21. J.J. Rassweiler, T. Knoll, and K.U. Kohrmann Shock wave technology and application: an update Eur Urol 59 2011 784
22. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, J.A. McAteer, and J.C. Williams Jr. Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors BJU Int 102 2008 1681
23. G. Vallancien, R. Munoz, and M. Borghi Relationship between the frequency of piezoelectric shock waves and the quality of renal stone fragmentation. In vitro study and clinical implications Eur Urol 16 1989 41
24. M.J. Weir, N. Tariq, and R.J. Honey Shockwave frequency affects fragmentation in a kidney stone model J Endourol 14 2000 547
25. R.F. Paterson, D.A. Lifshitz, and J.E. Lingeman Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model J Urol 168 2002 2211
26. A.P. Evan, J.A. McAteer, and B.A. Connors Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery BJU Int 100 2007 624
27. P. Zhong, Y. Zhou, and S. Zhu Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL Ultrasound Med Biol 27 2001 119
28. M. Delius, M. Jordan, and H. Eizenhoefer Biological effects of shock waves: kidney haemorrhage by shock waves in dogs-administration rate dependence Ultrasound Med Biol 14 1988 689
29. P.C. Ryan, B.J. Jones, and E.W. Kay Acute and chronic bioeffects of single and multiple doses of piezoelectric shockwaves (EDAP LT. 01) J Urol 145 1991 399
30. M.J. Semins, B.J. Trock, and B.R. Matlaga The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis J Urol 179 2008 194