Shock wave technology and application: An update

European Urology

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 784-796

  Rassweiler, Jens J ^a   Knoll, Thomas ^b   Köhrmann, Kai Uwe ^c   McAteer, James A ^d   Lingeman, James E ^e   Cleveland, Robin O ^f   Bailey, Michael R ^g   Chaussy, Christian ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f Boston University   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Lithotripter; Shock wave generation; Urolithiasis

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; KIDNEY INJURY; LITHOTRIPSY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION DETECTION; REVIEW; SHOCK WAVE; STONE DISSOLUTION; TEMPERATURE; VISCOSITY; WAVEFORM;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLITHIASIS;

EID: 79953243281     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.033     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. C. Chaussy, W. Brendel, and E. Schmiedt Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves Lancet 2 1980 1265 1268 (Pubitemid 11197312)
2. G. Fuchs, K. Miller, J. Rassweiler, and F. Eisenberger Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: one-year experience with the Dornier lithotripter Eur Urol 11 1985 145 149 (Pubitemid 15236361)
3. J.J. Rassweiler, C. Renner, C. Chaussy, and S. Thüroff Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy An update Eur Urol 39 2001 187 199 (Pubitemid 32171186)
4. J.E. Lingeman, J.A. McAteer, E. Gnessin, and A.P. Evan Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique Nat Rev Urol 6 2009 660 670
5. J.J. Rassweiler, G.G. Tailly, and C. Chaussy Progress in lithotriptor technology EAU Update Series 3 1 2005 17 36 (Pubitemid 40298357)
6. H. Danuser, R. Müller, B. Descoeundres, E. Dobry, and U.E. Studer Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 52 2007 539 546 (Pubitemid 46963462)
7. J.J. Rassweiler, T. Bergsdorf, and C. Bohris Consensus: shock wave technology and application - state of the art in 2010 C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 37 52
8. M. Lokhandwalla, and B. Sturtevant Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage Phys Med Biol 45 2000 1923 1940 (Pubitemid 30489676)
9. P. Zhong, X.F. Xi, S.L. Zhu, F.H. Cocks, and G.M. Preminger Recent developments in SWL physics research J Endourol 13 1999 611 617
10. L.A. Crum Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL J Urol 140 1988 1587 1590
11. W. Eisenmenger The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in ESWL Ultrasound Med Biol 27 2001 683 693 (Pubitemid 32492885)
12. O.A. Sapozhnikov, A.D. Maxwell, MacConaghy, and M.R. Bailey A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy J Acoust Soc 121 2007 1190 1202 (Pubitemid 46192718)
13. J. Rassweiler, U. Köhrmann, G. Heine, W. Back, O. Wess, and P. Alken Modulith SL 10/20 - experimental introduction and first clinical experience with a new interdisciplinary lithotriptor Eur Urol 18 1990 237 241
14. M. Delius, and W. Brendel A mechanism of gallstone destruction by extracorporeal shock waves Naturwissenschaften 75 1988 200 201
15. Y. Zhou, F.H. Cocks, G.M. Preminger, and P. Zhong Innovation in shock wave lithotripsy technology: updates in experimental studies J Urol 172 2004 1892 1898 (Pubitemid 39363083)
16. Y.A. Pishalnikov, O.A. Sapozhnikov, and J.C. Williams Jr. Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shock waves J Endourol 17 2003 435 446 (Pubitemid 37129306)
17. R.O. Cleveland, and O.A. Sapozhnikov Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy J Acoust Soc Am 118 2005 2667 2676 (Pubitemid 41463976)
18. P. Partheymüller Sonolith i-sys: the new standard in lithotripsy C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 65 70
19. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, R. McAteer, J. VonderHaar, I.V. Pishchalnikova, J.C. Williams, and A.P. Evan Detection of significant variation in acoustic output of an electromagnetic lithotripter J Urol 176 2006 2294 2298 (Pubitemid 44633141)
20. O. Wess Storz Medical - shock wave technology for medival applications C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 78 81
21. M. De Sio, R. Autorino, and G. Quarto A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single centre experience with a dual-focus lithotriptor BJU Int 100 2007 1137 1141 (Pubitemid 47537639)
22. S. Ginter, M. Burkhardt, and P. Vallon Richard Wolf: the piezoelectric ESWL - more than 20 years of clinical success worldwide C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 87 92
23. R. Bölles, P. Hoffmann, P. Dickmann, and D. Neisius First clinical results of extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of kidney and ureteral stones with the Piezolith 3000 with focal zones Akt Urol 37 2006 9 12
24. W. Eisenmenger, X.X. Du, and C. Tang The first clinical results of "wide focus and low-pressure" ESWL Ultrasound Med Biol 28 2002 769 774 (Pubitemid 34756811)
25. A.P. Evan, J.A. McAteer, and B.A. Connors Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig BJU Int 101 2007 382 388
26. M. Lanski, N. Ulucan, L. Burnes, and Lithoskop: discover the future of urology today C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 71 77
27. S. Hofsäß, M. Rheinwald, and Dornier MedTech: update on products for urology C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments. 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 57 69
28. H. Wiksel, and A.C. Kinn Implications of cavitation phenomena for shot intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BJU Int 75 1995 720 723
29. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, O.A. Sapozhnikov, M.R. Bailey, I.V. Pishchalnikova, J.C. Williams Jr., and J.A. McAteer Cavitation selectively reduces the negative-pressure phase of lithotripter shock waves Acoust Res Lett Online 6 2005 280 286 (Pubitemid 43107550)
30. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, J.S. Neucks, R.J. Von der Haar, I.V. Pishchalnikova, J.C. Williams Jr., and J.A. McAteer Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy J Urol 176 2006 2706 2710 (Pubitemid 44665961)
31. C. Bohris Quality of coupling in ESWL significantly affects the disintegration capacity - how to achieve good coupling with ultrasound gel C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 61 64
32. A. Jain, and T.K. Shah Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Eur Urol 51 2007 1680 1687 (Pubitemid 46634737)
33. T. Bergsdorf, C. Chaussy, and S. Thüroff Energy coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy - the impact of coupling quality on disintegration efficacy J Endourol 22 Suppl 2008 A161
34. J.S. Neucks, Y.A. Pishchalnikov, A.J. Zancanaro, J.N. von der Haar, J.C. Williams Jr., and J.A. McAteer Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy Res Urol 36 2008 61 66
35. R.O. Cleveland, R. Anglade, and R.K. Babayan Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of a Storz Modulith SLX J Endourol 18 2004 629 633 (Pubitemid 39319409)
36. C. Bohris, T. Bayer, and R. Gumpinger Ultrasound monitoring of kidney stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with an external transducer: does fatty tissue cause image distortions that affect stone comminution? J Endourol 24 2010 81 88
37. C. Bohris, T. Bayer, and C. Lechner Hit/miss monitoring of ESWL by spectral Doppler ultrasound Ultrasound Med Biol 29 2003 705 712 (Pubitemid 36566548)
38. T.G. Leighton, F. Fedele, and A.J. Coleman A passive acoustic device for real-time monitoring of the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy treatment Ultrasound Med Biol 34 2008 1651 1665
39. A. Hartung, and W. Schwarze LithoSpace by AST GmbH C. Chaussy, G. Haupt, D. Jocham, K.U. Köhrmann, Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments 2010 Thieme Stuttgart, Germany 53 56
40. A. Greenstein, and H. Matzkin Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? Urology 54 1999 430 432 (Pubitemid 29407015)
41. R.F. Paterson, D.A. Lifshitz, and J.E. Lingeman Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model J Urol 168 2002 2211 2215
42. Y.A. Pishchalnikov, J.A. McAteer, J.C. Williams Jr., I. Pishchalnikova, and R.J. vonDerHaar Why stones break better at slow shock wave rate than at fast rate: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter J Endourol 20 2006 537 541 (Pubitemid 44689637)
43. R. Gillitzer, A. Neisius, and J. Wöllner Low-frequency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improves rebal pelvic stone disintegration in a pig model BJU Int 103 2009 1284 1288
44. J.A. McAteer, A.P. Evan, J.C. Williams Jr., and J.E. Lingeman Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shockwave lithotripsy Curr Opin Urol 19 2009 192 195
45. K. Davenport, A. Minervini, S. Keoghane, J. Parkin, and F.X. Keeley Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi J Urol 176 2006 2055 2058 (Pubitemid 44633173)
46. K. Madbouly, A.M. El-Tiraifi, M. Seida, S.R. El-Faqiu, R. Atasi, and R.F. Talic Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study J Urol 173 2005 127 130 (Pubitemid 39627692)
47. E. Yilmaz, E. Batislam, M. Basar, D. Tuglu, C. Mert, and H. Basar Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study Urology 66 2005 1160 1164 (Pubitemid 41797281)
48. K.T. Pace, D. Ghiculete, M. Harju, R.J. Honey University of Toronto Lithotripsy Associates Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial J Urol 174 2005 595 599 (Pubitemid 40981611)
49. J. Chacko, M. Moore, N. Sankey, and P.S. Chandhoke Does slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones? J Urol 175 2006 1370 1373 discussion 1373-4
50. Y. Kato, S. Yamaguchi, J. Hori, M. Okuyama, and H. Kakizaki Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy Int J Urol 13 2006 1461 1465 (Pubitemid 44786329)
51. V. Koo, I. Beattie, and M. Voung Improved cost-effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shock wave delivery rate BJU Int 105 2010 692 696
52. A.Z. Weizer, P. Zhong, and G.M. Preminger New concepts in shock wave lithotripsy Urol Clin North Am 34 2007 375 382 (Pubitemid 47189603)
53. O. Seemann, J. Rassweiler, M. Chvapil, P. Alken, and G.W. Drach The effect of single shock waves on the vascular system of artificially perfused rabbit kidneys J Stone Disease 5 1993 172 178
54. L.R. Willis, A.P. Evan, B.A. Connors, R.K. Handa, P.M. Blomgren, and J.E. Lingeman Prevention of lithotripsy-induced renal injury by pretreating kidneys with low-energy shock waves J Am Soc Nephrol 17 2006 663 667
55. E.H. Lambert, R. Walsh, M.W. Moreno, and M. Gupta Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial J Urol 183 2010 580 584
56. B. Granz, and G. Köhler What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy? J Stone Dis 4 1992 123 128
57. C. Sorensen, P. Chandhoke, M. Moore, C. Wolf, and A. Sarram Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor J Urol 168 2002 35 37 (Pubitemid 34640779)
58. G.G. Tailly In situ SWL of ureteral stones: comparison between an electrohydraulic and an electromagnetic shock wave source J Endourol 16 2002 209 214 (Pubitemid 34535256)
59. N. Lalak, S.A. Moussa, G. Smith, and D.A. Tolley The Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter: the first 500 renal calculi J Endourol 16 2002 3 7 (Pubitemid 34215519)
60. N. Lalak, S.A. Moussa, G. Smith, and D.A. Tolley The Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter: the first 150 ureteral calculi J Endourol 16 2002 645 648 (Pubitemid 35340759)
61. J. Rassweiler, K.U. Köhrmann, and W. Back Experimental basis of shockwave-induced renal trauma in the model of the canine kidney World J Urol 11 1993 43 53 (Pubitemid 23116637)
62. K.U. Koehrmann, W. Back, and J. Bensemann The isolated perfused kidney of the pig: new model to evaluate shockwave induced lesions J Endourol 8 1994 105 110 (Pubitemid 24305779)
63. T. Bergsdorf, S. Thüroff, and C. Chaussy The isolated perfused kidney: an in vitro test system for evaluation of renal tissue by high-energy shockwave sources J Endourol 19 2005 883 888 (Pubitemid 41434462)
64. A.P. Evan, J.A. McAteer, B.A. Connors, P.M. Blomgren, and J.E. Lingeman Renal injury in SWL is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery BJU Int 100 2007 624 627 (Pubitemid 47205466)
65. J.B. Freund, T. Colonius, and A.P. Evan A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy Ultrasound Med Biol 33 2007 1495 1503 (Pubitemid 47302191)
66. P. Zhong, Y. Zhou, and S. Zhu Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture Ultrasound Med Biol 28 2002 661 671
67. H. Chen, W. Kreider, A.A. Brayman, R. Bailey, and T.J. Matula Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation Phys Rev Lett 106 2011 34301
68. J.C. Williams Jr., J.F. Jason, M.A. Woodward, M.A. Stonehill, A.P. Evan, and J.A. McAteer Cell damage by lithotripter shock waves at high pressure to preclude cavitation Ultrasound Med Biol 25 1999 473 479
69. M.R. Bailey, Y.A. Pishchalnikov, and O.A. Sapozhnikov Cavitation detection during shock wave lithotripsy Ultrasound Med Biol 31 2005 1245 1249
70. V. Maker, and J. Iayke Gastrointestinal injury secondary to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a review of the literature since its inception Am Coll Surg 198 2004 128 135 (Pubitemid 38201097)
71. B.R. Matlaga, J.A. McAteer, and B.A. Connors Potential for cavitation-mediated tissue damage in shockwave lithotripsy J Endourol 22 2008 121 126
72. A.E. Krambeck, A.D. Rule, X. Li, E.J. Bergstralh, M. Gettman, and C. Lieske Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup J Urol 185 2011 164 169
73. R.K. Handa, J.A. McAteer, A.P. Evan, B.A. Connors, Y.A. Pishchalnikov, and S. Gao Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotripter delivering 240 shock waves per minute J Urol 181 2009 884 889