Explaining the appearance and success of open space referenda

Ecological Economics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2013, Pages 108-117

  Heintzelman, Martin D ^a   Walsh, Patrick J ^b   Grzeskowiak, Dustin J ^a  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Open space; Referenda; Spatial econometrics; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECONOMETRICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPEN SPACE; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TAX SYSTEM;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883826167     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albert J.H., Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993, 88:669-679.
2. Anselin L. The Local Indicators of Spatial Association - LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27:93-115.
3. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics 1999, 1-31. Working Paper, Dallas, Tx, University of Texas at Dallas.
4. Anselin L. Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 2002, 27(3):247-267.
5. Anselin L., Le Gallo J. Interpolation of air quality measures in hedonic house price models: spatial aspects. Spatial Economic Analysis 2006, 1(1):31-51.
6. Banzhaf H.S., Oates W.E., Sanchirico J.N. Success and design of local referenda for land conservation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2010, 29(4):769-798.
7. Bellotti T., Crook J. Credit scoring with macroeconomic variables using survival analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2009, 60:1699-1707.
8. Bourassa S.C., Cantoni E., Hoesli M. Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house price prediction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2007, 35:143-160.
9. Box M. The death of firms: exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden. Small Business Economics 2008, 31(4):379-393.
10. Brasington D.M., Hite D. Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2005, 35:57-82.
11. Cleves M., Gould W.W., Gutierrez R., Marchenko Y. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata 2008, Stata Press, College Station, Texas. 2nd ed.
12. Cox D.R. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1972, 34(2):187-220.
13. Deacon R., Shapiro P. Private preference for collective goods revealed through voting on referenda. American Economic Review 1975, 65(5):943-955.
14. Fiva J., Rattsø J. Local choice of property taxation: evidence from Norway. Public Choice 2007, 132(3):457-470.
15. Getz M., Huang Y. Consumer revealed preference for environmental goods. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1978, 60(3):449-458.
16. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2000, Prentice Hall, Saddle River, New Jersey.
17. Hasse J., Lathrop R. Tracking New Jersey's Dynamic Landscape: Urban Growth and Open Space Loss 1986-1995-2002 2008, Geospatial Research Lab, Rowan University and Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University, (Available at http://www.crssa.rutgers.edu/projects/lc/urbangrowth/).
18. Hasse J., Lathrop R. Changing Landscapes in the Garden State: Urban Growth and Open Space Loss in NJ 1986 through 2007 2010, Geospatial Research Lab, Rowan University and Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University, (Available at http://www.crssa.rutgers.edu/projects/lc/).
19. Heckman J.J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47(1):153-161.
20. Heintzelman M.D. Measuring the property-value effects of local land use and preservation referenda. Land Economics 2010, 86(1):22-47.
21. Howell-Moroney M. What are the determinants of open-space ballot measures? An extension of the research. Social Science Quarterly 2004, 85(1):169-179.
22. Kahn Matthew E., Matsusaka John G. Demand for environmental goods: evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. Journal of Law and Economics 1997, 40(1):137-174.
23. Kline J.D. Public demand for preserving local open space. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 2006, 19(7):645-659.
24. Kline J., Wichelns D. Using referendum data to characterize public support for purchasing development rights to farmland. Land Economics 1994, 70(2):223-233.
25. Kotchen M.J., Powers S.M. Explaining the appearance and success of voter referenda for open-space conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52(1):373-390.
26. LeSage J.P. Bayesian estimation of limited dependent variable spatial autoregressive models. Geographical Analysis 2000, 32(1):19-35.
27. LeSage J., Pace R.K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics 2009, Florida, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
28. Lin D.Y., Wei L.J. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989, 84(408):1074-1078.
29. List J.A. Young, selfish and male: field evidence of social preferences. The Economic Journal 2004, 114(492):121-149.
30. Ma S., Huang J. Additive risk survival model with microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(1):192-202.
31. Mueller J.M., Loomis J.B. Spatial dependence in hedonic property models: do different corrections for spatial dependence result in economically significant differences in estimated implicit prices?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2008, 33(2):212-231.
32. Nelson E., Uwasu M., Polasky S. Voting on open space: what explains the appearance and support of municipal-level open space conservation referenda in the United States?. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(3-4):580-593.
33. Puhani Patrick A. The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys 2000, 14(1):53-68.
34. Simmons-Mosley T.X., Malpezzi S. Household mobility in New York City's regulated rental housing market. Journal of Housing Economics 2006, 15(1):38-62.
35. Sunderberg J.O. Voting for Public Funding of Open Space 2006, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, (available at: https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/dl/1172_Sundberg%20Working%20Final%2006-2.pdf).
36. Vance C., Geoghegan J. Temporal and spatial modeling of tropical deforestation: a survival analysis linking satellite and household survey data. Agricultural Economics 2002, 27(3):317-332.
37. Vossler C.A., McKee M. Induced-value tests of contingent valuation elicitation mechanisms. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 35(2):137-168.
38. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
39. Wu X., Cutter B. Who votes for public environmental goods in California?: Evidence from a spatial analysis of voting for environmental ballot measures. Ecological Economics 2011, 70(3):554-563.