How the clustering of phonological neighbors affects visual word recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1649-1656

  Yates, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical decision; Network science; Phonological neighborhood

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883822913     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0032422     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. L. (1999). Diameter of the world wide web. Nature, 401, 130-131. doi:10.1038/43601
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801686
3. Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 12-28.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639-647. doi:10.3758/BF03200465
6. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B.,... Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
7. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
8. Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2009). The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1934-1949. doi:10.1037/a0016902
9. Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119, 417-430. doi:10.1037/a0027175
10. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1197
11. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
12. Cortese, M. J., & Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 384-387. doi:10.3758/BF03195585
13. Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2008). Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 791-794. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.791
14. Cortese, M. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269-1276. doi: 10.3758/BF03211827
15. Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70. doi:10.3758/BF03206399
16. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806452
17. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674
18. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.358
20. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2008). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives. (pp. 159-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
21. Kučera, H., & Francis, N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
22. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
23. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 203-208.
24. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 65-79. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.65
25. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 404-409. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
26. Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. In Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, Indiana University.
27. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2002). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30, 34-45. doi:10.3758/BF03195263
28. Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-156. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.139
29. Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Newman, M. E. J., & Friend, A. J. (2007). Community structure in the United States House of Representatives. Physica A, 386, 414-438. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.039
30. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
31. Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1339-1362. doi:10.1080/02724980244000099
32. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
33. Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 41-78. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3
34. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198. doi:10.3758/BF03197716
35. Vieira, I. T., Cheng, R. C. H., Harper, P. R., & De Senna, V. (2010). Small world network models of the dynamics of HIV infection. Annals of Operations Research, 178, 173-200. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0571-y
36. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735-747. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
37. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'smallworld' networks. Nature, 393, 440-442. doi:10.1038/30918
38. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Tse, C.-S., & Besner, D. (2008). On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 495-513. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495
39. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971-979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
40. Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1385-1397. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1385
41. Yates, M. (2009). Phonological neighborhood spread facilitates lexical decisions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1304-1314. doi:10.1080/17470210902725746
42. Yates, M. (2010). Investigating the importance of the least supported phoneme on visual word naming. Cognition, 115, 197-201. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.002
43. Yates, M., Friend, J., & Ploetz, D. M. (2008). Phonological neighbors influence word naming through the least supported phoneme. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1599-1608. doi:10.1037/a0011633
44. Yates, M., Locker, L. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 452-457. doi:10.3758/BF03196594
45. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2525