Sentencing Risk: Temporality and Precaution in Terrorism Trials

International Political Sociology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 313-331

  de Goede, Marieke ^a   de Graaf, Beatrice ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883817456     PISSN: 17495679     EISSN: 17495687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ips.12025     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agamben, Giorgio. (2005) State of Exception. Trans Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Amoore, Louise. (2008) Risk Before Justice: When the Law Contests Its Own Suspension. Leiden Journal of International Law 21 (4): 847-861.
3. Amoore, Louise. (2013) The Politics of Possibility: Security Beyond Probability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4. Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster (2007) Governing Terrorism through Risk: Taking Precautions, (Un)knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 89-115.
5. Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster (2011) Politics of Catastrophe: Genealogies of the Unknown. London: Routledge.
6. Bajwa, Ali Naseem. (2010) Sentencing Terror Offences. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, August 14.
7. Baker, Tom, and Jonathan Simon, Eds. (2002) Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Barot, Regina v. (2006) Sentence. Woolwich Crown Court, November 7. London. Transcript Merrill Legal Solutions.
9. Barot, Regina v. (2007) Judgment on Appeal, Royal Courts of Justice, May 16. London. EWCA Crim 1119.
10. BBC. (2006) Police Terror Probe of Vast Scale. BBC News (November 7, 2006). Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6125338.stm. (Accessed March 1, 2012.)
11. Bhatti, Regina v. et al. (2007) Sentence. Woolwich Crown Court, June 15. London. Transcript Merrill Legal Solutions.
12. Borgers, Mathias, and Elies van Sliedregt (2009) The Meaning of the Precautionary Principle for the Assessment of Criminal Measures in the Fight Against Terrorism. Erasmus Law Review 2 (2): 171-195.
13. Business News Radio. (2005) Terreurverdachte Soumaya S. ontkent aantijgingen, August 3.
14. Butler, Judith. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
15. Central Criminal Court. (2006) The Queen Versus Dhiren Barot and Co-defendants, Draft Case Summary (Issue 2), March 30.
16. Chesney, Robert M. (2005) The Sleeper Scenario: Terrorism Support Laws and the Demands for Prevention. Harvard Journal on Legislation 42 (1): 1-89.
17. Chesney, Robert M. (2007) Beyond Conspiracy? Anticipatory Prosecution and the Challenge of Unaffiliated Terrorism. Southern California Law Review 80 (3): 425-502.
18. Christenson, Ron. (1989) Political Trials. Gordian Knots in the Law. New Brunswick/Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
19. Connolly, William E. (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Council of the European Union. (2002) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on Combating Terrorism, 2002/475/JHA.
21. De Goede, Marieke. (2008) Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination. Security Dialogue 39 (2/3): 155-176.
22. De Graaf, Beatrice. (2011a) Terrorists on Trial: A Performative Perspective. ICCT-Research Paper. Available at http://www.icct.nl/userfiles/file/ICCT%20EM%20Paper%20Terrorism%20Trials%20as%20Theatre.pdf. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
23. De Graaf, Beatrice. (2011b) Evaluating Counterterrorism Performance. A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.
24. De Telegraaf. (2005) Preken en Porno, July 16.
25. De Volkskrant. (2006) Videotestament Samir A. op televisie. De Volkskrant (September 14, 2006). Available at http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2686/Binnenland/article/detail/814966/2006/09/14/Video-testament-Samir-A-op-televisie.dhtml. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
26. District Court Rotterdam. (2005) LJN AU4531, 10/600046-05, Verdict in the Piranha-case, October 19, 2005. Available at http://jure.nl/au4531. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
27. District Court Rotterdam. (2006) Verdict in the Piranha-case, December 1, 2006. LJN: AZ3589, Rechtbank Rotterdam, 10/600052-05, 10/600108-05, 10/600134-05, 10/600109-05, 10/600122-05, 10/600023-06, 10/600100-06. Available at http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/detailpage.aspx?ljn=AZ3589. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
28. District Court The Hague. (2008a) LJN: BC2576, 2200189706, Verdict January 23, 2008. Available at http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/Default.aspx. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
29. District Court The Hague. (2008b) LJN: BF5225, 22-007350-06; Verdict October 2, 2008. Available at http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/detailpage.aspx?ljn=BF5225. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
30. Eijkman, Quirine A. M., and Bibi van Ginkel (2011) Compatible or Incompatible: Intelligence and Human Rights in Terrorist Trials. Amsterdam Law Forum 3 (4): 3-16.
31. Ericson, Richard V. (2007) Crime in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Policy.
32. Ericson, Richard V., and Kevin D. Haggerty, Eds. (2003) Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
33. Feeley, Malcolm M., and Jonathan Simon (1992) The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications. Criminology 30 (4): 449-474.
34. Goldstein, Joseph, and William K. Rashbaum (2011). City Bomb Plot Suspect is Called Fan of Qaeda Cleric. New York Times (November 20, 2011), Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/21/nyregion/jose-pimentel-is-charged-in-new-york-city-bomb-plot.html?pagewanted=all. (Accessed March 2, 2012.)
35. Gregory, Derek. (2006) The Black Flag: Guantánamo Bay and the Space of Exception. Geografiska Annaler 88 B (4): 405-427.
36. Groen, Janny, and Annieke Kranenberg (2006) Strijdsters van Allah. Radicale Moslima's en het Hofstadnetwerk. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
37. Grusin, Richard. (2004) Premediation. Criticism 46 (1): 17-39.
38. Grusin, Richard. (2010) Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. London: Palgrave.
39. Jalil, Regina v., et al. (2008) Judgment on Appeal. Royal Courts of Justice, December 4. London. EWCA Crim 2910.
40. Johns, Fleur. (2005) Guantánamo Bay and the Annihilation of the Exception. European Journal of International Law 16 (4): 613-635.
41. Johns, Fleur, and Wouter Werner (2008) The Risks of International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law 21 (4): 783-786.
42. Kassim Allo, Awol. (2010) The 'Show' in the 'Show Trial': Contextualizing the Politicization of the Courtroom. Barry Law Review 15 (1): 41-72.
43. Kessler, Oliver. (2008) Is Risk Changing the Politics of Legal Argumentation? Leiden Journal of International Law 21 (4): 863-884.
44. Kessler, Oliver, Ed. (2010) Forum: International Law and International Political Sociology. International Political Sociology 3 (4): 303-321.
45. Kessler, Oliver, and Wouter Werner (2008) Extrajudicial Killing as Risk Management. Security Dialogue 39 (2/3): 289-308.
46. Kifer, Misty, Craig Hemmens, and Mary K. Stohr (2003) The Goals of Corrections: Perspectives from the Line. Criminal Justice Review 28 (1): 47-69.
47. Kirchheimer, Otto. (1961) Political Justice. The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48. Krasmann, Susanne. (2012) Law's Knowledge: On the Susceptibility and Resistance of Legal Practices to Security Matters. Theoretical Criminology 16 (4): 379-394.
49. McCulloch, Jude, and Sharon Pickering (2009) Precrime and Counter-terrorism: Imagining Future Crime in the 'War on Terror'. British Journal of Criminology 49 (5): 628-645.
50. Nacos, Brigitte L., and Oscar Torres-Reyna (2007) Fueling Our Fears. Stereotyping, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion of Muslim Americans. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
51. Neal, Andrew. (2012) Normalisation and Legislative Exceptionalism: Counter-terrorist Lawmaking and Changing Emergencies. International Political Sociology 6 (3): 260-276.
52. O'Hanlon, Kate. (1998) Sentence Guidelines for Terrorist Crimes. The Independent, Online Edition (November 6, 1998). Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/Friday-law-report-sentence-guidelines-for-terrorist-crimes-1183016.html. (Accessed December 5, 2012.)
53. Opitz, Sven. (2011) Conflicting Temporalities: Law in Times of Risk. Behemoth 4 (2): 58-82.
54. Power, Michael. (2004) The Risk Management of Everything. Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
55. Public Prosecution. (2006a) Repliek van de Officier van Justitie in de zaak 'Arles, ' February 24. Amsterdam (J. Plooy and A. van Dam).
56. Public Prosecution. (2006b) Requisitoir van de Officier van Justitie in de zaak 'Piranha, ' Part I and II, November 3 and 6. Amsterdam-Osdorp.
57. Rough Presentation for Gas Limos Project. (n.d.) NEFA Foundation. Available at http://www.nefafoundation.org/miscellaneous/Barot/GasLimos.pdf. (Accessed March 1, 2012.)
58. Sarat, Austin, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Merrill Umphrey, Eds. (2007) Law and Catastrophe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Schinkel, Willem. (2011) Prepression. The Actuarial Archive and New Technologies of Security. Theoretical Criminology 15 (4): 365-380.
60. Schmid, Alex. (2004) Terrorism. The Definitional Problem. Journal of International Law 36 (1): 375-420.
61. Shearing, Clifford. (2001) Punishment and the Changing Face of the Governance. Punishment and Society 3 (2): 203-220.
62. Simon, Jonathan. (2008) Choosing Our Wars, Transforming Governance: Crime, Cancer, Terror. In Risk and the War on Terror, edited by Louise Amoore and Marieke de Goede London: Routledge.
63. Staatsblad. (2004) Wet Terroristische Misdrijven, June 24.
64. Stern, Jessica, and Jonathan B. Wiener (2006) Precaution against Terrorism. Journal of Risk Research 9 (4): 393-447.
65. Supreme Council. (2011) LJN: BP7544, CPG 08/04418. Verdict 15 March, 2011. Available at http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/detailpage.aspx?ljn=BP7544. (Accessed December 4, 2012.)
66. Suskind, Ron. (2006) The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.
67. The Economist. (2006) No Noble Cause. The Economist (November 9, 2006). Available at http://www.economist.com/node/8144265. (Accessed March 2, 2012.)
68. Tsoulaka, Anastassia. (2008) Security, Risk and Human Rights: A Vanishing Relationship?, CEPS Special Report, Brussels, September.
69. Van der Woude, Maartje. (2010) Wetgeving in een Veiligheidscultuur. Totstandkoming van Antiterrorismewetgeving Bezien van Maatschappelijke en (Rechts)Politieke Context. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
70. Van Hoecke, Mark. (2002) Law as Communication. Oxford/Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.
71. Weimann, Gabriel. (1983) The Theater of Terror: Effects of Press Coverage. Journal of Communication 33 (1): 38-45.
72. Werner, Wouter. (2010) The Use of Law in International Political Sociology. International Political Sociology 4 (3): 304-307.
73. Zedner, Lucia. (2007) Pre-Crime and Post-Criminology? Theoretical Criminology 11 (2): 261-281.