Prepression: The actuarial archive and new technologies of security

Theoretical Criminology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 365-380

  Schinkel, Willem ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

actuarialism; social imagination; surveillance; the archive; pre crime

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855130178     PISSN: 13624806     EISSN: 14617439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362480610395366     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Aggression and Violent Behavior (2001) 6(2–3): 115–356.
2. Albayrak N. (2008) Toespraak staatssecretaris van Justitie bij afsluiting kick-off programma Aanpak jeugdcriminaliteit, 21 mei 2008 in de Koninklijke Schouwburg in Den Haag. Available at http://www.justitie.nl/actueel/toespraken/archief-2008/80521programma-aanpak-jeugdcriminaliteit.aspx?cp=34&cs=7401 (10 May 2009).
3. Bauman Z. (2000) ‘Social Uses of Law and Order’, in Garland D., Sparks R. (eds) Criminology and Social Theory, pp. 23–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bauman Z. (2009) ‘The Demons of an Open Society’, in Schinkel W. (ed.) Globalization and the State: Sociological Perspectives on the State of the State, pp. 106–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Beck U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
6. Beck U. (2002) ‘The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited’, Theory, Culture & Society 19(4): 39–55.
7. Beck U., Giddens A., Lasch S. (1994) Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Berlin F.S., Galbreath N.W., Geary B. (2003) ‘The Use of Actuarials at Civil Commitment Hearings to Predict the Likelihood of Future Sexual Violence’, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 15(4): 377–82.
9. Bowker G.C. (2005) Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Brighenti A. (2007) ‘Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences’, Current Sociology 55(3): 323–42.
11. Castel R. (1991) ‘From “Dangerousness” to Risk’, in Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 281–98. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. De Maillard J. (2005) ‘The Governance of Safety in France: Is There Anybody in Charge?’, Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 325–43.
13. Derrida J. (1995) Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. De Vries M. (2007) ‘Signaleren en samenwerken in Rotterdam: Een praktijkverslag’, in Gerris J.R.M. (ed.) Jeugdzorg: Professionaliteit, integrale aanpak, overdracht van warden en normen, pp. 55–67. Assen: Van Gorcum.
15. Douglas M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
16. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. (1980) Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17. Edwards A., Hughes G. (2005) ‘Comparing the Governance of Safety in Europe: A Geo-Historical Approach’, Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 345–63.
18. Elbogen E.B. (2002) ‘The Process of Violence Risk Assessment: A Review of Descriptive Research’, Aggression and Violent Behavior 7(6): 591–604.
19. Ericson R.V., Haggerty K.D. (1997) Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
20. Esposito E. (2002) Soziales Vergessen: Formen und Medien des Gedächtnisses der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
21. Ewald F. (1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’, in Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 197–210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Feeley M.M., Simon J. (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications’, Criminology 30(4): 449–74.
23. Ford R., Webster R. (2008) ‘State to Take Action against Parents Who Can't Control Their Children’, The Times, 27 June: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4221921.ece (consulted 3 January 2011).
24. Foucault M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
25. Foucault M. (1994) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. III. London: Penguin.
26. Foucault M. (2004) Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France, 1977–1978. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
27. Garland D. (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
28. Gerris J.R.M. (ed.) (2007) Jeugdzorg: Professionaliteit, integrale aanpak, overdracht van warden en normen. Assen: Van Gorcum.
29. Gerson N. (2008) ‘Kleine informantjes’, De Groene Amsterdammer 132(27): 12–15.
30. Hacking I. (1975) The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hacking I. (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hacking I. (1991) ‘How Should We Do the History of Statistics?’, in Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 181–96. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Hallsworth S. (2005) ‘Modernity and the Punitive’, in Pratt J., Brown D., Brown M., Hallsworth S., Morrison W. (eds) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives, pp. 239–55. Cullompton: Willan.
34. Harcourt B.E. (2007) Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Jacobs J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
36. Luhmann N. (1991) Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin: De Gruyter.
37. Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
38. Luhmann N. (2006) Beobachtungen der Moderne. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
39. Lyon D. (2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Surveillance, Risk and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge.
40. Lyon D. (2007) Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity.
41. Mercado C.C., Ogloff J.R.P. (2006) ‘Risk and the Preventive Detention of Sex Offenders in Australia and the United States’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 30(1): 49–59.
42. Ministry of Justice (2006a) ‘Verwijsindex Antillianen wordt in gebruik genomen’, press release, 19 December. Available at http://www.justitie.nl/actueel/persberichten/archief2006/Verwijsindex-antillianen-wordt-in-gebruik-genomen.aspx (consulted 8 December 2008).
43. Ministry of Justice (2006b) ‘Managementletter landelijke invoering JCO-Support systeem’. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.
44. Ministry of Youth and Family (2010) Voortgangsrapportage Samenwerken met de Jeugd. The Hague: Ministry of Youth and Family.
45. Murdoch J., Ward N. (1997) ‘Governmentality and Territoriality: The Statistical Manufacture of Britain's “National Farm”’, Political Geography 16(4): 307–24.
46. Noordegraaf M. (2008) ‘Meanings of Measurement: The Real Story Behind the Rotterdam Safety Index’, Public Management Review 10(2): 219–37.
47. Noordegraaf M., Noordegraaf-Eelens L. (2009) ‘The Monitoring State and Financial Markets’, in Schinkel W. (ed.) Globalization and the State: Sociological Perspectives on the State of the State, pp. 62–82. Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
48. Power M. (1997a) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Power M. (1997b) ‘From Risk Society to Audit Society’, Soziale Systeme: Zeitschrift für Soziologische Theorie 3(1): 3–21.
50. Power M. (2004) The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
51. Prins C. (2008) ‘Heeft digitale jeugdzorg de toekomst?’, in van den Berg M.A., Prins C., Ham M. (eds) In de greep van de technologie: Nieuwe toepassingen en het gedrag van de burger, pp. 23–50. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
52. PwC (2007) Quick Scan Elektronisch Kind Dossier. PriceWaterhouseCoopers: 2007–2599u.
53. Rhodes R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Rose N. (2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Rotterdam Municipality (2006) ‘Samen werken aan veiligheid: Voorkomen en handhaven’, Vijfjarenactieprogramma Veilig Rotterdam, 2006–2010. Rotterdam: City Council.
56. Rotterdam Municipality (2007) Ieder Kind Wint: Visiedocument. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Municipality.
57. Rotterdam Municipality (2008) Werken aan een veiliger Rotterdam, de aanpak: Methodiek actief burgerschap [Working towards a Safer Rotterdam, the Approach: Method Active Citizenship]. Rotterdam City Council (Directie Veiligheid).
58. Schinkel W. (2002) ‘The Modernist Myth in Criminology’, Theoretical Criminology 6(2): 123–44.
59. Schinkel W. (2007) Denken in een tijd van sociale hypochondrie: Aanzet tot een theorie voorbij de maatschappij. Kampen: Klement.
60. Schinkel W. (2009) ‘“Illegal Aliens” and the State, or: Bare Bodies versus the Zombie’, International Sociology 24(6): 779–806.
61. Schinkel W. (2010) ‘The Virtualization of Citizenship’, Critical Sociology 36(2): 265–83.
62. Schinkel W., Noordegraaf M. (2011) ‘Professionalism as Symbolic Capital: Materials for a Bourdieusian Theory of Professionalism’, Comparative Sociology 10(6).
63. Schinkel W., van den Berg M.A. (2011) ‘City of Exception: The Dutch Revanchist City and the Urban Homo Sacer’, forthcoming in Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography.
64. Schinkel W., van Houdt F. (2010) ‘The Double Helix of Cultural Assimilationism and Neo-Liberalism: Citizenship in Contemporary Governmentality’, British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 696–715.
65. Schuilenburg M. (2004) ‘De noodtoestand als regel: Cyberkritische reflecties over de openbare ruimte’, Justitiële Verkenningen 30(8): 9–21.
66. Selmini R. (2005) ‘Towards Città Sicure? Political Action and Institutional Conflict in Contemporary Preventive and Safety Policies in Italy’, Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 307–23.
67. Sennett R. (1970) The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68. Shearing C., Johnston L. (2005) ‘Justice in the Risk Society’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38(1): 25–38.
69. Silver E. (2000) ‘Actuarial Risk Assessment: Reflections on an Emerging Social-Scientific Tool’, Critical Criminology 9(1/2): 123–43.
70. Sparks R. (2001) ‘Degrees of Estrangement: The Cultural Theory of Risk and Comparative Criminology’, Theoretical Criminology 5(2): 159–76.
71. Stenson K. (2005) ‘Sovereignty, Biopolitics and the Local Government of Crime in Britain’, Theoretical Criminology 9(3): 265–87.
72. Tops P. (2007) Regimeverandering in Rotterdam: Hoe een stadsbestuur zichzelf opnieuw uitvond. Amsterdam: Atlas.
73. Van den Berg M.A. (2008) ‘Rotterdamse interventieteams zetten rechtvaardigheid op het spel. Boeventuig of vernieuwers?’, TSS 1–2.
74. Van den Berg M.A., Prins C., Ham M. (eds) (2008) In de greep van de technologie: Nieuwe toepassingen en het gedrag van de burger. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
75. Van Yperen T. (2007) ‘De praktijk van theoriegestuurd en “evidence-based” hulpverlenen: Weten wat je doet bij jeugdigen’, in Gerris J.R.M. (ed.) Jeugdzorg: Professionaliteit, integrale aanpak, overdracht van warden en normen, pp. 19–30. Assen: Van Gorcum.
76. Wandall R.H. (2007) ‘Actuarial Risk Assessment: The Loss of Recognition of the Individual Offender’, Law, Probability and Risk. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm00110.1093/lpr/mgm001.
77. Weinrich H. (2004) Lethe: The Art and Critique of Forgetting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
78. WODC (2008) Security Implications for Converging Technologies: Impact on the Constitutional State and the Legal Order. Enschede: Telematica Instituut.
79. Yates F. (1966) The Art of Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80. Young J. (1999) The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: SAGE.
81. Zedner L. (2007) ‘Pre-Crime and Post-Criminology?’, Theoretical Criminology 11(2): 261–81.