Information bias condemning radical food innovators? The case of insect-based products in the Netherlands

International Food and Agribusiness Management Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1-16

  Pascucci, Stefano ^a   De Magistris, Tiziana ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2   (Spain)

Author keywords

Multi stakeholder engagement; Sustainable development; Wicked problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883816322     PISSN: 15592448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Belluco, S., C. Losasso, M. Maggioletti, C. C. Alonzi, M. G. Paoletti and A. Ricci 2013. Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 12(3): 296-313.
2. Borrás, S. 2006. Legitimate governance of risk at the EU level? The case of genetically modified organisms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(1):61-75.
3. Bunte, F., van Galen, M., de Winter, M., Dobson, P., Bergès-Sennou, F., Monier-Dilhan, S., Juhász, A., Moro, D., Sckokai, P., Soregaroli, C., van der Meulen, B., and Szajkowska, A. 2011. The impact of private labels on the competitiveness of the European food supply chain. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.ISBN 978-92-79-19149-7, 201.
4. DeFoliart, G.R. 1997. An overview of the role of edible insects in preserving biodiversity. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36(2-4):109-132.
5. DeFoliart, G.R. 1999. Insects as food: why the western attitude is important. Annual Review of Entomology 44:21-50.
6. Derkzen, P., L. Dries and S. Pascucci 2011. Conceptualizing the acceptance of insect-based food ingredients in western diets. Proceedings of the 5th International Consumer Sciences Research Conference on "Consumer Behaviour for a Sustainable Future", University of Bonn, Germany.
7. Elzerman, J. E., M. A. van Boekel and P. A. Luning 2013. Exploring meat substitutes: consumer experiences and contextual factors. British Food Journal 115(5): 700-710.
8. European Novel Foods Regulation (EC) 258/97. European Commission. Health and Consumers - General Directorate (DG).
9. Fessler, D.M.T. and C.D. Navarrete 2003. Meat is good to taboo. Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(1): 1-40.
10. Gao, Z. and T.C. Schroeder 2009. Consumer responses to new food quality information: are some consumers more sensitive than others? Agricultural Economics 40(3): 339-346.
11. Golan, E., F. Kuchler, L. Mitchell, C. Green and A. Jessup 2001. Economics of food labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy 24:117-184.
12. Belluco, S., C. Losasso, M. Maggioletti, C. C. Alonzi, M. G. Paoletti and A. Ricci 2013. Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 12(3): 296-313.
13. Borrás, S. 2006. Legitimate governance of risk at the EU level. The case of genetically modified organisms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(1):61-75.
14. Bunte, F., van Galen, M., de Winter, M., Dobson, P., Bergès-Sennou, F., Monier-Dilhan, S., Juhász, A., Moro, D., Sckokai, P., Soregaroli, C., van der Meulen, B., and Szajkowska, A. 2011. The impact of private labels on the competitiveness of the European food supply chain. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.ISBN 978-92-79-19149-7, 201.
15. DeFoliart, G.R. 1997. An overview of the role of edible insects in preserving biodiversity. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36(2-4):109-132.
16. DeFoliart, G.R. 1999. Insects as food: why the western attitude is important. Annual Review of Entomology 44:21-50.
17. Derkzen, P., L. Dries and S. Pascucci 2011. Conceptualizing the acceptance of insect-based food ingredients in western diets. Proceedings of the 5th International Consumer Sciences Research Conference on "Consumer Behaviour for a Sustainable Future", University of Bonn, Germany.
18. Elzerman, J. E., M. A. van Boekel and P. A. Luning 2013. Exploring meat substitutes: consumer experiences and contextual factors. British Food Journal 115(5): 700-710.
19. European Novel Foods Regulation (EC) 258/97. European Commission. Health and Consumers - General Directorate (DG).
20. Fessler, D.M.T. and C.D. Navarrete 2003. Meat is good to taboo. Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(1): 1-40.
21. Gao, Z. and T.C. Schroeder 2009. Consumer responses to new food quality information: are some consumers more sensitive than others. Agricultural Economics 40(3): 339-346.
22. Golan, E., F. Kuchler, L. Mitchell, C. Green and A. Jessup 2001. Economics of food labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy 24:117-184.
23. Sylvester, D. J., K. W. Abbott and G.E. Marchant 2009. Not again! Public perception, regulation, and nanotechnology. Regulation & Governance 3(2):165-185.
24. Tonsor, G. and Shupp R. 2011. Cheap Talk Scripts and Online Choice Experiments: Looking Beyond the Mean. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(4): 1015-1031.
25. Train, K. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 334.
26. UNFPA 2012. State of World Population 2012. New York: UNFPA.
27. Veldkamp T., G. van Duinkerken, A. van Huis, C.M.M. Lakemond, E. Ottevanger, G. Bosch and M.A.J.S. van Boekel. 2012. Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets - a feasibility study. Wageningen, Wageningen UR Livestock Research Report 638. ISSN 1570 - 8616.
28. Verkerk M.C., J. Tramper, J.C.M. van Trijp and D.E. Martens 2007. Insect cells for human food. Biotechnology Advances 25:198-202.
29. Wijnands, J.H.M., B.M.J. van der Meulen and K.J. Poppe (eds.) 2007. Competitiveness of the European Food Industry An economic and legal assessment. Report European Commission - Enterprise and Industry - Reference no. ENTR/05/75. 328.
30. Yen, A.L. 2009. Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia.. Entomological Research 39:289-298.
31. http://www.venik.nl/index.php.res=high[access 06/06/2013].
32. http://www.venik.nl/site/.lang=nl[access 06/06/2013].