Using Net wetland loss, current wetland condition, and planned future watershed condition for wetland conservation planning and prioritization, Tampa Bay Watershed, Florida

Wetlands

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 949-963

  Rains, M C ^a   Landry, S ^a   Rains, K C ^b   Seidel, V ^c   Crisman, T L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Three Parameters Plus Inc   (United States)

^c Balmoral Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensatory mitigation; Geographic information systems; Land use land cover; Landscape development index; Watershed

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA ACQUISITION; DATABASE; GIS; LANDSCAPE; PRIORITIZATION; STAKEHOLDER; WATERSHED; WETLAND;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; TAMPA BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883814978     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: 19436246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-013-0455-4     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Beechie T, Pess G, Roni P, Giannico G (2008) Setting river restoration priorities: a review of approaches and a general protocol for identifying prioritization actions. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:891-905
2. Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 32:67-98
3. Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg
4. Brown MT, Vivas MB (2005) Landscape development intensity index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 101:289-309
5. Brown MT, Boyd M, Ingwersen W, King S, McLaughlin D (2010) Wetlands on clay settling areas. Publication No. 03-149-238. Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, Bartow
6. Cicchetti G, Greening H (2011) Estuarine biotope mosaics and habitat management goals: an application in Tampa Bay, FL, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 34:1278-1292
7. Cipollini KA, Maruyama AL, Zimmerman CL (2005) Planning for restoration: a decision analysis approach to prioritization. Restoration Ecology 13:460-470
8. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ED (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Publication FWS/OBS-79/31. US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC
9. Dahl TE (1990) Wetland losses in the United States, 1780s to 1980s. US Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
10. Dahl TE (2005) Florida's wetlands: an update on status and trends, 1985 to 1996. US Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
11. Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1998 to 2004. US Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
12. Dahl TE (2011) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 2004 to 2009. US Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
13. Florida Department of Transportation (1999) Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee
14. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (2010) Guide to the natural communities of Florida: 2010 edition. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee
15. Fretwell JD, Williams JS, Redman PJ (1996) National water summary on wetland resources. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2425. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
16. Genskow KD, Born SM (2006) Organizational dynamics of watershed partnerships: a key to integrated water resources management. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 135:56-64
17. Haag KH, Lee TM (2010) Hydrology and ecology of freshwater wetlands in central Florida - a primer. US Geological Survey Circular 1342. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
18. Hefner JM, Brown JD (1984) Wetland trends in the southeastern United States. Wetlands 4:1-11
19. Knochenmus LA (2006) Regional evaluation of the hydrogeologic framework, hydraulic properties, and chemical characteristics of the Intermediate Aquifer System underlying southern west-central Florida. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5013. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20. Lee TM, Haag KH, Metz PA, Sacks LA (2009) Comparative hydrology, water quality, and ecology of selected natural and augmented freshwater wetlands in west-central Florida. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1758. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
21. Lewis Environmental Services (1996) Setting priorities for Tampa Bay habitat protection and restoration: restoring the balance. Technical Publication #09-95. Tampa Bay National Estuary Program, St. Petersburg
22. Metz PA (2011) Factors that influence the hydrologic recovery of wetlands in the northern Tampa Bay area, Florida. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5127. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
23. Miller JA (1997) The hydrogeology of Florida. In: Jones DS, Randazzo R (eds) The geology of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 69-88
24. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics 35:25-33
25. Morrison G, Greening H (2011) Freshwater inflows. In: Yates KK, Greening H, Morrison G (eds) Integrating science and resource management in Tampa Bay, Florida. US Geological Survey Circular 1348. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 157-202
26. Murphy KE, Rains MC, Kittridge MG, Stewart M, Ross MA (2008) Hydrological connectivity between clay settling areas and surrounding hydrological landscapes in the phosphate mining district, peninsular Florida, USA. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44:980-995
27. National Academy of Sciences (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
28. Nilsson KA, Rains MC, Lewis DB, Trout KE (2013) Hydrologic characterization of 56 geographically isolated wetlands in west-central Florida using a probabilistic method. Wetland Ecology and Management 21:1-14
29. Palik BJ, Goebel PC, Kirkman LK, West L (2000) Using landscape hierarchies to guide restoration of disturbed ecosystems. Ecological Applications 10:189-202
30. PBS&J (2010) Tampa Bay Estuary Program habitat master plan update. Technical Report #06-09. Tampa Bay Estuary Program, St. Petersburg
31. Ratti JT, Rocklage AM, Giudice JH, Garton EO, Golner DP (2001) Comparison of avian communities on restored and natural wetlands in North and South Dakota. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65:676-684
32. Reiss KC, Brown MT (2007) Evaluation of Florida palustrine wetlands: application of USEPA Levels 1, 2, and 3 assessment methods. EcoHealth 4:206-218
33. Reiss KC, Brown MT, Lane CR (2010) Characteristic community structure of Florida's subtropical wetlands: the Florida wetland condition index for depressional marshes, depressional forested, and flowing water forested wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 18:543-556
34. Rochow TF (1994) The effects of water table level changes on fresh-water marsh and cypress wetlands in the northern Tampa Bay region: a review. Environmental Section Technical Report 1994-1. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville
35. Seabloom EW, van der Valk A (2003) Plant diversity, composition, and invasion of restored and natural prairie pothole wetlands: implications for restoration. Wetlands 23:1-12
36. Sinclair WC (1974) Hydrologic characteristics of the surficial aquifer in northwest Hillsborough County, Florida. Florida Bureau of Geology Information Circular 86. Florida Bureau of Geology, Tallahassee
37. Southwest Florida Water Management District (2002b) 1990 land use/cover classifications [Computer File, GIS shapefiles]. Retrieved from http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/data/gis/layer-library/metadata/lu90.html. Accessed December 2008
38. Southwest Florida Water Management District (2008) 2007 land use/cover classifications [Computer File, GIS shapefiles]. Retrieved from http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/data/gis/layer-library/metadata/lu07.html. Accessed December 2008
39. Southwest Florida Water Management District (1996) Northern Tampa Bay Water Resources Assessment Project: Vol. 1, surface-water/ground-water interrelationships. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville
40. Southwest Florida Water Management District (2002) 1950 land use [Computer File, GIS shapefiles]. Obtained from April Davis. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville, Accessed December 2008
41. Southwest Florida Water Management District (2006) Lower Hillsborough River low flow study results and minimum flow recommendation. Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville
42. Stedman S, Dahl TE (2008) Status and trends of wetlands in the coastal watersheds of the eastern United States, 1998 to 2004. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
43. Stein ED, Brinson M, Rains MC, Kleindl W, Hauer FR (2009) Wetland assessment alphabet soup: how to choose (or not choose) the right assessment method. Wetland Science and Practice 26:20-24
44. Tampa Bay Water (2012) Current source distribution. http://www. tampabaywater.org/current-water-sources-in-use-tampa-bay-region.aspx. Accessed December 2012
45. Thom RM, Haas E, Evans NE, Williams GD (2011) Lower Columbia River and estuary habitat restoration prioritization framework. Ecological Retration 29:94-110
46. Tihansky AB (1999) Sinkholes, west-central Florida. In: Galloway D, Jones DR, Ingebritsen SE (eds) Land subsidence in the United States. US Geological Survey Circular 1182. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 121-140
47. Travis SE, Proffitt CE, Lowenfeld RC, Mitchell TW (2002) A comparative assessment of genetic diversity among differently-aged populations of Spartina alterniflora on restored versus natural wetlands. Restoration Ecology 10:37-42
48. Turner RE, Redmond AM, Zedler JB (2001) Count it by acre or function - mitigation adds up to net loss of wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter 23(5-6):14-16
49. US Geological Survey (1982) Habitat data for Tampa Bay, Florida, USA, in 1952. [Computer File, GIS coverages]. Retrieved from http://dl.cr.usgs.gov/net- prod-download/public/gom
50. US Geological Survey (2008) High resolution national hydrography dataset. [Computer File, GIS shapefiles]. Retrieved from http://nhdgeo.usgs.gov/ metadata/nhd-high.htm. Accessed December 2008
51. Whigham DF (1999) Ecological issues related to wetland preservation, restoration, creation and assessment. Science of the Total Environment 240:31-40