Phenotypic integration in flowers of neotropical lianas: Diversification of form with stasis of underlying patterns

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2283-2296

  Alcantara, S ^a   de Oliveira, F B ^a   Lohmann, L G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bignoniaceae; Bignonieae; Genetic variance covariance matrix; Morphological evolution; Quantitative traits

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELECTION;

BIGNONIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

ARTICLE; BIGNONIACEAE; BIGNONIEAE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIANCE/COVARIANCE MATRIX; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS;

BIGNONIACEAE; BIGNONIEAE; GENETIC VARIANCE/COVARIANCE MATRIX; MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAITS;

BIGNONIACEAE; FLOWERS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84883812529     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12228     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackermann, R.R. & Cheverud, J.M. 2002. Discerning evolutionary processes in patterns of tamarin (genus Saguinus) craniofacial variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 117: 260-271.
2. Alcantara, S. & Lohmann, L.G. 2010. Evolution of floral morphology and pollination systems in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 97: 782-796.
3. Alcantara, S. & Lohmann, L.G. 2011. Contrasting phylogenetic signals and evolutionary rates in floral traits of Neotropical lianas. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 102: 378-390.
4. Armbruster, W.S., Pélabon, C., Hansen, T.F. & Mulder, C.P.H. 2004 Floral integration, modularity, and precision: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci, K. Preston, eds), pp. 23-49. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
5. Arnold, S.J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140S: 85-107.
6. Arnold, S.J., Bürger, R., Hohenlohe, P.A., Ajie, B.C. & Jones, A.G. 2008. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62: 2451-2461.
7. Berg, R.L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14: 171-180.
8. Cheverud, J.M. 1996. Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton-top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 5-42.
9. Cheverud, J.M. & Marroig, G. 2007. Comparing covariance matrices: random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Gen. Mol. Biol. 30: 461-469.
10. Cheverud, J.M., Wagner, G.P. & Dow, M.M. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38: 201-213.
11. Clausen, J. & Hiesey, W.M. 1960. The balance between coherence and variation in evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 46: 494-506.
12. Diggle, P.K. 1992 Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters. In: Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction (R. Wyatt, ed.), pp. 326-355. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
13. Estes, S. & Arnold, S.J. 2007. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 169: 227-244.
14. Gentry, A.H. 1974. Coevolutionary patterns in Central American Bignoniaceae. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 61: 728-759.
15. Harder, L.D. & Johnson, S.D. 2009. Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phyt. 183: 530-545.
16. Harmon, L.K. & Glor, R.E. 2010. Poor statistical performance of the mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses. Evolution. 64: 2173-2178.
17. Herrera, C.M., Cerdá, X., García, M.B., Guitián, J., Medrano, M., Rey, P.J. et al. 2002. Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumble bee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 108-121.
18. Jamniczky, H.A. 2008. Phenotypic integration patterns support an account of homology as a manifestation of evolvability. J. Evol. Biol. 35: 312-316.
19. Jamniczky, H.A. & Hallgrímsson, B. 2009. A comparison of covariance structure in wild and laboratory muroid crania. Evolution 23: 1540-1556.
20. Kirkpatrick, M. 2010 Rates of adaptation: why is Darwin's machine so slow? In: Evolution since Darwin: The first 150 years (M.A. Bell, D.J. Futuyma, W.F. Eanes, J.S. Levinton, eds), pp. 177-195. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
21. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic-analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain - body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
22. Lessells, C.M. & Boag, P.T. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116-121.
23. Lohmann, L.G. 2006. Untangling the phylogeny of neotropical lianas (Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93: 304-318.
24. Lohmann, L.G., Bell, C., Calioó, M.F. & Winkworth, R. 2013. Pattern and timing of biogeographic history in the Neotropical tribe Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 171: 154-170.
25. Manly, B.F.J. 1986 Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
26. Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J.M. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of New World Monkeys. Evolution 55: 2576-2600.
27. Marroig, G., Porto, A., Shirai, L.T., Oliveira, F.B. & Conto, V.D. 2009. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: evolutionary consequences. J. Evol. Biol. 36: 136-148.
28. Merilä, J. & Björklund, M. 2004 Phenotypic integration as constraint and adaptation. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci, K. Preston, eds), pp. 107-129. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
29. Oliveira, F.B., Porto, A. & Marroig, G. 2009. Covariance structure in the skull of Catarrhini: a case of pattern stasis and magnitude evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 56: 417-430.
30. Olson, E.C. & Miller, R.L. 1958 Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
31. Ordano, M., Fornoni, J., Boege, K. & Domínguez, C.A. 2008. The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration. New Phyt. 179: 1183-1192.
32. Pérez, F., Arroyo, M.T.K. & Medel, R. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of floral integration in Schizanthus (Solanaceae): does pollination truly integrate corolla traits? J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1730-1738.
33. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol. Lett. 6: 265-272.
34. Pigliucci, M. 2004 Studying mutational effects on G-matrices. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci, K. Preston, eds), pp. 231-250. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
35. Porto, A., Oliveira, F.B., Shirai, L.T., Conto, V.D. & Marroig, G. 2009. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull I: morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. J. Evol. Biol. 36: 118-135.
36. Prôa, M., O'Higgins, P. & Monteiro, L.R. 2012. Test I error rates for testing genetic drift with phenotypic covariances matrices: a simulation study. Evolution 67: 185-195.
37. Revell, L.J. 2007. The G matrix under fluctuating correlational mutation and selection. Evolution 61: 1857-1872.
38. Riedl, R.J. 1977. A systems-analytical approach to macroevolutionary phenomena. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52: 351-370.
39. Rosas-Guerrero, V., Quesada, M., Armbruster, W.S., Pérez-Barrales, R. & Smith, S.D. 2011. Influence of pollination specialization and breeding system on floral integration and phenotypic variation in Ipomoea. Evolution 65: 350-364.
40. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774.
41. Stebbins, G.L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, UK.
42. Steppan, S.J. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis of multivariate data. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (M. Pigliucci, K. Preston, eds), pp. 325-344. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
43. Steppan, S.J., Phillips, P.C. & Houle, D. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trend. Ecol. & Evol. 17: 320-327.
44. Strauss, S.Y. & Whittall, J.B. 2006 Nonpollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: The Ecology and Evolution of Flowers (L.D. Harder, S.C.H. Barrett, eds), pp. 120-138. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
45. SYSTAT Software. 2000. SYSTAT Version 10. SYSTAT Inc., Point Richmond, CA.
46. Wagner, G.P. 2010. Evolvability: the missing piece of the Neo-Darwinian synthesis. In: Evolution since Darwin: The first 150 years (M.A. Bell, D.J. Futuyma, W.F. Eanes, J.S. Levinton, eds), pp. 197-213. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
47. Wagner, G.P. & Altenberg, L. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967-976.
48. Waitt, D.E. & Levin, D.A. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 80: 310-319.