Does ownership type matter for innovation? Evidence from China

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2473-2478

  Waller, David S ^b   Cai, Shaohan ^c  

^a Alice)   (Macao)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

China; Innovation performance; Knowledge sourcing strategy; Ownership type

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883787459     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.037     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Thousand Oaks' Sage.
2. Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B. Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization 2006, 28:401-426.
3. Carte T.A., Russell C.J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(3):479-501.
4. Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 2006, 52(1):62-82.
5. Cefis E., Rosenkranz S., Weitzel U. Effects of coordinated strategies on product and process R&D. Journal of Economics 2009, 96:193-222.
6. Chesbrough H., Crowther A.K. Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 2006, 36(3):229-236.
7. Child J., Tse D. China's transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies 2001, 32:5-21.
8. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:128-152.
9. Dean T.J., Brown R.L., Bamford C.E. Differences in large and small firm response to environmental context: Strategic implications form a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:709-728.
10. Department of Comprehensive Statistics of National Bureau of Statistics China compendium of statistics 1949-2008 2010, 40. China Statistics Press, ([U+56FD][U+5BB6][U+7EDF][U+8BA1][U+5C40][U+56FD][U+6C11][U+7ECF][U+6D4E][U+7EFC][U+5408][U+7EDF][U+8BA1][U+53F8](2010). [U+65B0][U+4E2D][U+56FD][U+516D][U+5341][U+5E74][U+7EDF][U+8BA1][U+8D44][U+6599][U+6C47][U+7F16]. [U+4E2D][U+56FD][U+7EDF][U+8BA1][U+51FA][U+7248][U+793E], p. 40).
11. Dess G.G., Beard D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29:52-73.
12. Fey C.F., Birkinshaw J. External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management 2005, 31(4):597-621.
13. Gao G.Y., Murray J.Y., Kotabe M., Lu J.Y. A "strategy tripod" perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41:377-396.
14. Gedajlovic E. Ownership, strategy and performance: Is the dichotomy sufficient?. Organization Studies 1993, 14:731-752.
15. Granstrand O., Bohlin E., Oskarsson S., Sjoberg N. External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management 1992, 22(2):111-133.
16. Haour G. Stretching the knowledge base of the enterprise through contract research. R&D Management 1992, 22:177-182.
17. Ju M., Zhao H. Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: The moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2009, 26:701-717.
18. Li D., Chau P.Y.K., Lai F. Market orientation, ownership type, and e-business assimilation: Evidence from Chinese firms. Decision Sciences 2010, 41(1):115-145.
19. Lichtenthaler U. Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R&D Management 2009, 39(4):317-330.
20. Mascarenhas B. Strategic group dynamics. Academy of Management Journal 1989, 32:333-352.
21. Park S.H., Chen G., Gallagher S. Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45(3):527-545.
22. Peng M.W., Sun S.L., Pinkham B., Chen H. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives 2009, 23(2):63-81.
23. Peng M.W., Tan J., Tong T.W. Ownership types and strategic groups in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41(7):1105-1129.
24. Santamaría L., Nieto M.J., Barge-Gil A. The relevance of different open innovation strategies for R&D performers. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 2010, 45:93-114.
25. Srholec M. Does foreign ownership facilitate cooperation on innovation? Firm-level evidence from the enlarged European Union. European Journal of Development Research 2009, 21(1):47-62.
26. Steensma H.K., Fairbank J.F. Internalizing external technology: A model of governance mode choice and an empirical assessment. Journal of High Technology Management Research 1999, 10(1):1-35.
27. Su Y.S., Tsang E.W.K., Peng M.W. How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2009, 26:309-331.
28. Tan J. Impact of ownership type on environment, strategy, and performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Management Studies 2002, 39(3):333-354.
29. Vega-Jurado J., GutieD́rrez-Gracia A., FernaD́ndez-de-Lucio I. Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 2009, 18(4):637-670.
30. Weerawardena J. The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing 2003, 11:15-35.
31. Zhou K.Z., Yim C.K., Tse D.K. The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing 2005, 69:42-60.