Automated analysis of multi site MRI phantom data for the NIHPD project

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4191 LNCS - II, Issue , 2006, Pages 144-151

  Fu, Luke ^a   Fonov, Vladimir ^a   Pike, Bruce ^a   Evans, Alan C ^a   Collins, D Louis ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

DATA VARIATIONS; NIHPD PROJECT; PERCENT INTEGRAL UNIFORMITY (PIU);

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BRAIN; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNITED STATES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN; CHILD; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REFERENCE VALUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883777300     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11866763_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Mah D., Steckner M., Palacio E., Mitra R., Richardson T., Hanks G.E.: Characteristics and quality assurance of a dedicated open 0.23 T MRI for radiation therapy simulation. Medical Physics, Vol. 29(11):2541-2547, November 2002
2. Jones R.W., Witte R.F.: Signal intensity artifacts in clinical MR imaging. Radiographics Vol. 20(3):893-901, May-June 2000.
3. Lemieux L., Barker G.J.: Measurement of small inter-scan fluctuations in voxel dimensions in magnetic resonance images using registration. Medical Physics, Vol. 25(6): 1049-1054, June 1998.
4. Jovicich J., Czanner S., Greve D., Haley E., Kouwe A., Gollub R., Kennedy D., Schmitt F., Brown G., MacFall J., Fischl B., Dale A., Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of a gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neurolmage, Vol. 30(2):436-43, April 2006.
5. Evans A.C., Brain Development Cooperative Group: The NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Neurolmage, Vol. 30(1): 184-202, March 2006.
6. American College of Radiology: Phantom Test Guidance for the ACR MRI Accreditation Program. American College of Radiology, September 2000.
7. Chen C.C., Wan Y.L., Wai Y.Y., Liu H.L.: Quality Assurance of Clinical MRI Scanners Using ACR MRI Phantom: Preliminary Results. Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 17(4):279-284, December 2004.
8. st Edition, June 1999.
9. Bourel P., Gibon D., Coste E., Daanen V., Rousseau J.: Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment. Medical Physics, Vol. 26(12), December 1999:2693-2700.
10. Colombo P., Baldassarri A., Del Corona M., Mascaro L., Strocchi S.: Multicenter trial for the set-up of aMRI quality assurance programme. Magentic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 22:93-101, 2004.
11. Ewers M., Teipel S.J., Dietrich O., Schonberg S.O., Jessen F., Heun R., Scheltens P., van de Pol L., Freymann N.R., Moeller H.J., Hampel H.: Multicenter assessment of reliability of cranial MRI. Neurobiology of Aging, epub. [Vol. 27(8):1051-9, August 2006].
12. Neelin P.: The MINC File Format: From Bytes to Brains. NeuroImage, Vol. 7(4), 1998.
13. Magnusson P., Olson L. E.: Image analysis methods for assessing levels of image plane nonuniformity and stochastic noise in a magnetic resonance image of a homogeneous phantom. Medical Physics, Vol. 27(8): 1980-1994, August 2000.
14. Schnack H.G., van Haren N. E. M., Hulshoff Pol H. E., Picchioni M., Weisbrod M., Sauer H., Cannon T., Huttunen M., Murray R., Kahn R. S.: Reliability of Brain Volumes from Multicenter MRI Acquisition: A Calibration Study. Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 22:312-320, 2004.