Video monitoring nearshore sandbar morphodynamics on a partially engineered embayed beach

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn , Issue SPEC. ISSUE 65, 2013, Pages 458-463

  De Santiago, Iñaki ^a,b   Morichon, Denis ^a   Abadie, Stéphane ^a   Castelle, Bruno ^c   Liria, Pedro ^b   Epelde, Irati ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

^b MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; COAST; DUNE; ENGINEERING; MORPHODYNAMICS; NEARSHORE ENVIRONMENT; SANDBAR; SPATIAL VARIATION; VIDEOGRAPHY;

SPAIN;

EID: 84883770611     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: 15515036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2112/SI65-078     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alexander, P.S., and Holman, R.A. 2004. Quantitative analysis of nearshore morphological variability based on video imaging. Marine Geology, 208 (1), 101-111.
2. Battjes J.A. and M.J.F. Stive. 1985: Calibration and verification of a dissipation model for random breaking waves, Journal of Geophysical Research., 90(C5), pp. 9159-9167.
3. Bernabeu, A.M.; Medina, R., and Vidal, C., 2003. Wave reflection on natural beaches: an equilibrium beach profile model. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 57(4), 577-585.
4. Castelle, B., Marieu, V., Bonneton, P., Bruneau, N. and Ruessink, B.G. 2010. Coupling mechanisms in double sandbar systems. Part 1: Patterns and physical explanation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35, 476-486.
5. Castelle, B. and Ruessink, B.G., 2011. Modeling formation and subsequent nonlinear evolution of rip channels: Time-varying versus time-invariant wave forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, F04008, doi:10.1029/2011JF001997
6. Castelle, B. and Coco, G., 2012. The morphodynamics of rip channels on embayed beaches. Continental Shelf Research, 43, 10-23.
7. Davis, R.A., Fox, W.T., Hayes, M.O., and Boothroyd, J.C., 1972. Comparison of ridge and runnel systems in tidal and non-tidal environments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 42, 413-421.
8. Enjalbert, C., Castelle, B., Rihouey, D. and Dailloux, D. 2011. High-frequency video observation of a geologically-constrained barred-beach: La Grande Plage de Biarritz (France). Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 64, 70-74.
9. Gallop, S.L., Bryan, K.R., Coco, G., and Stephens, S.A., 2011. Storm-driven changes in rip channel patterns on an embayed beach. Geomorphology 127, 179-188.
10. Holland, K.T., Holman, R.A, Lippmann, T.C., Stanley, J. and Plant, N., 1997. Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies. Oceanic Engineering 22, 1, 81-92.
11. Jacob, D. and Podzun, R. (1997). Sensitivity studies with the regional climate model remo. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 63:119-129.
12. Kraus, N.C., 1988. The effects of seawalls on the beach: an extended literature. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 4, pp. 945-960.
13. Lippmann, T.C. and Holman, R.A., 1989. Quantification of sand bars morphology: a video technique based on wave dissipation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 995-1011.
14. Lippmann, T.C. and Holman, R.A., 1990. The Spatial and temporal variability of sand bar morphology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95 (C7), 11.575-11.590.
15. Masselink, G. and Short, A. D., 1993. The effect of tide range on beach morphodynamics and morphology: A conceptual beach model. Journal of Coastal Research, 9, pp. 785-800.
16. Orzech, M.D., Reniers, A.J.H.M., Thornton, E.B. and MacMahan, J.H., 2011. Megacusps on rip channel bathymetry: Observations and modeling. Coastal Engineering, 58, 890-907.
17. Pilkey, O.H. and Wright, H.L., 1988. Seawalls versus beaches. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 4, pp. 41-66.
18. Ruessink, B.G., Coco, G., Ranasinghe, R. and Turner, I.L., 2007. Coupled and noncoupled behavior of three-dimensional morphological patterns in double sandbar system. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C07002, doi: 10.1029/2006JC003799.
19. Short, A. D. 1996. The role of wave height, period, slope, tide range and embaymentisation in beach classifications: a review. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69:589-604.
20. Short, A.D., and Masselink, G., 1999. Embayed and structurally controlled embayed beaches. In: Short, A.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 230-250.
21. Van Enckevort, I.M.J., and Ruessink, B.G., 2001. Effect of hydrodynamics and bathymetry on video estimates of nearshore sandbar position. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 16969-16980.
22. Van Enckevort, I.M.J., and Ruessink, B.G., Coco, G., Suzuki, K., Turner, I.L., Plant, N.G., Holman, R.A., 2004. Observations of nearshore crescentic sandbars. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, C06028. Doi:10.1029/2003JC002214.
23. Wright, L. D., and A. D. Short (1984), Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis, Marine Geology, 56, 93-118.