Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1653-1660

  Ochi, Megumi ^a   Kanazawa, Manabu ^a   Sato, Daisuke ^a   Kasugai, Shohei ^a   Hirano, Shigezo ^a   Minakuchi, Shunsuke ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Computed tomography; Dental implant; Edentulous mandible; Mucosa supported surgical guide; Stereolithographic

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BONE DENSITY; CT IMAGE; EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; MANDIBLE MODELS; MUCOSA-SUPPORTED SURGICAL GUIDE; STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; SURGERY;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL THICKNESS (BONE); EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ACCURACY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANT; EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE; MUCOSA-SUPPORTED SURGICAL GUIDE; STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC;

AGED; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84883762374     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ganz S.D. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2005, 63(Suppl):59-71.
2. Sarment D.P., Sukovic P., Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2003, 18:571-577.
3. Arisan V., Karabuda C.Z., Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010, 21:980-988.
4. van Assche N., van Steenberghe D., Guerrero M.E., Hirsch E., Schutyser F., Quirynen M., Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2007, 34:816-821.
5. Ozan O., Orhan K., Turkyilmaz I. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2011, 22:1755-1761.
6. Pettersson A., Kero T., Gillot L., Cannas B., Fäldt J., Söderberg R. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2010, 103:334-342.
7. D'haese J., De Bruyn H. Effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2013, 15:402-411.
8. Vasak C., Watzak G., Gahleitner A., Strbac G., Schemper M., Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011, 22:1157-1163.
9. Pettersson A., Komiyama A., Hultin M., Näsström K., Klinge B. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14:527-537.
10. Turbush S.K., Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2012, 108:181-188.
11. Soares M.M., Harari N.D., Cardoso E.S., Manso M.C., Conz M.B., Vidigal G.M. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2012, 27:824-831.
12. Cassetta M., Di Mambro A., Giansanti M., Stefanelli L.V., Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 42:264-275.
13. van Steenberghe D., Naert I., Andersson M., Brajnovic I., van Cleynenbreugel J., Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2002, 17:663-670.
14. Cassetta M., Stefanelli L.V., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Calasso S. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 40:1377-1387.
15. Cassetta M., Stefanelli L.V., Giansanti M., Calasso S. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2012, 27:655-663.
16. Komiyama A., Pettersson A., Hultin M., Näsström K., Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011, 22:308-313.
17. Al-Harbi S.A., Sun A.Y. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Implant Dent. 2009, 18:46-56.
18. Huumonen S., Haikola B., Oikarinen K., Söderholm A.L., Remes-Lyly T., Sipilä K. Residual ridge resorption, lower denture stability and subjective complaints among edentulous individuals. J. Oral Rehabil. 2012, 39:384-390.
19. Sanna A.M., Molly L., van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: a cohort study of consecutive patients. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007, 97:331-339.
20. González-García R., Monje F. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012, (Epub ahead of print).
21. Chang P.S., Parker T.H., Patrick C.W., Miller M.J. The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2003, 14:164-170.
22. Stumpel L.J. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14:442-453.
23. Reddy M.S., Mayfield-Donahoo T., Vanderven F.J., Jeffcoat M.K. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1994, 5:229-238.
24. Horwitz J., Zuabi O., Machtei E.E. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009, 20:1156-1162.