Maxillary sinus augmentation using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 331-338

  Mangano, F ^a   Zecca, P ^a   Pozzi Taubert, S ^a   Macchi, A ^a   Ricci, M ^b   Luongo, G ^c   Mangano, C ^a  

^a University of Varese   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone grafts; Computer aided design computer aided manufacturing (CAD CAM); Custom made; Sinus augmentation

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HYDROXYAPATITE;

BONE GRAFT; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING; CUSTOM-MAKE; MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES; MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES; MAXILLARY SINUS; SINUS AUGMENTATION; VISUAL ESTIMATION;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

BONE GRAFTS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING (CAD/CAM); CUSTOM-MADE; SINUS AUGMENTATION;

ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84883756870     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1460     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 166-177.
2. Tatum H, Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 207-229.
3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 613-616.
4. Rickert D, Huddleston Slater JJR, Meijer HJA, et al. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 160-167.
5. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 635-643.
6. Won YH, Kim SG, Oh JS, et al. Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft for sinus lifts in humans: a clinical and histologic study. Implant Dent 2011; 20: 460-464.
7. Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, et al. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32weeks after grafting. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2006; 26: 543-551.
8. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho SC, et al. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2005; 25: 551-559.
9. Mangano C, Scarano A, Perrotti V, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 980-986.
10. Lee JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 767-771.
11. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 197-207.
12. Damien E, Revell PA. Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute: a review of experimental studies and biomedical applications. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2004; 2: 65-73.
13. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants: an evidence-based literature review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 328-343.
14. Del Fabbro M, Testori T. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2004; 24: 565-577.
15. Testori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, et al. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: surgical techniques with histologic and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2008; 28: 9-17.
16. Chan HS, Wang HL. Sinus pathology and anatomy in relation to complications in lateral window sinus augmentation. Implant Dent 2011; 20: 406-412.
17. Flanagan D. Arterial supply of the maxillary sinus and potential for bleeding complication during lateral approach sinus elevation. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 336-338.
18. Shibli JA, Faveri M, Ferrari DS, et al. Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa in 1024 subjects with edentulous upper jaws: a retrospective study. J Oral Implantol 2007; 33: 293-296.
19. Kang SJ, Shin SI, Herr Y, et al. Anatomical structures in the maxillary sinus related to lateral sinus elevation: a cone beam computed tomographic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02378.x [epub ahead of print].
20. Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 258-265.
21. Velloso GR, Vidigal GM, de Freitas MM, et al. Tridimensional analysis of maxillary sinus anatomy related to sinus lift procedure. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 192-196.
22. Mandelaris GA, Rosenfeld AL. A novel approach to the antral sinus bone graft technique: the use of a prototype cutting guide for precise outlining of the lateral wall. A case report. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2008; 28: 569-575.
23. Oka K, Murase T, Moritomo H, et al. Corrective osteotomy using customized hydroxyapatite implants prepared by preoperative computer simulation. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2010; 6: 186-193.
24. Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 201 direct laser metal forming implants: results from a 1-year multicenter study on 62 patients. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 181-189.
25. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 5-15.
26. Guncu GN, Yildirim YD, Wang HL, et al. Location of posterior superior alveolar artery and evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy with computerized tomography: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1164-1167.
27. Li ZW, Zang MC, Li SP, et al. Application of computer-aided three-dimensional skull model with rapid prototyping technique in repair of zygomatic-orbito-maxillary complex fracture. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2009; 5: 158-163.
28. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Ress J, et al. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 7-26.
29. Lee SH, Choi BH, Li J, et al. Comparison of corticocancellous block and particulate bone grafts in maxillary sinus floor augmentation for bone healing around dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 324-328.
30. Smith MH, Flanagan CL, Kemppainen JM, et al. Computed tomopgraphy based tissue-engineered scaffolds in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007; 3: 207-216.