Phenotypic and genetic diversity of Spanish tomato landraces

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 162, Issue , 2013, Pages 150-164

  Cebolla Cornejo, Jaime ^a   Roselló, Salvador ^b   Nuez, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Amplified fragment length polymorphism; Genetic resources; Germplasm; Quality; Solanum lycopersicum; Traditional variety

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; FRUIT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RESOURCE; GENETIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ORGANIC ACID; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POLLEN; SUGAR;

SPAIN;

EID: 84883724710     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.044     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Archak S., Karihaloo J.L., Jain A. RAPD markers reveal narrowing genetic base of Indian tomato cultivars. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82:1139-1143.
2. Alvarez A.E., van de Wiel C.C.M., Smulders M.J.M., Vosman B. Use of microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 103:1283-1292.
3. Bai Y., Lindhout P. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes, what have we gained and what can we gain?. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:1085-1094.
4. Baldwin E.A., Scott J.W., Einstein M.A., Malundo T.M.M., Carr B.T., Shewfelt R.L., Tandon K.S. Relationship between sensory and instrumental analysis for tomato flavor. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1998, 123:906-915.
5. Bredemeijer G.M.M., Cooke R.J., Ganal M.W., Peeters R., Isaac P., Noordijk Y., Rendell S., Jackson J., Röder M.S., Wendehake K., Dijcks M., Amelaine M., Wickaert V., Bertrand L., Vosman B. Construction and testing of a microsatellite database containing more than 500 tomato varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105:1019-1026.
6. Brown A.H.D., Marshall D.R.A. Basic sampling strategy: theory and practice. Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity 2000, 75-91. CAB International, Wallingford. L. Guarino, V.R. Rao, R. Reid (Eds.).
7. Buntjer J.B. PhylTools; Phylogenetic Computer Tools V.1.32 2001, (accessed June 2011), Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands. http://www.plantbreeding.wur.nl/UK/software_PhylTools.html.
8. Camacho-Villa T.C., Maxted N., Scholten M., Ford-Lloyd B. Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 2005, 3:373-384.
9. Casals J., Pascual L., Cañizares J., Cebolla-Cornejo J., Casañas F., Nuez F. Genetic basis of long shelf life and variability into Penjar tomato. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 2011, 59:219-229.
10. Casals J., Pascual L., Cañizares J., Cebolla-Cornejo J., Casañas F., Nuez F. The risks of success in quality vegetable markets, possible genetic erosion in Marmande tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and consumer dissatisfaction. Sci. Hort. 2011, 130:78-84.
11. Cebolla-Cornejo J., Soler S., Nuez F. Genetic erosion of traditional varieties of vegetable crops in Europe, tomato cultivation in Valencia (Spain) as a case Study. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2007, 1:113-128.
12. Cebolla-Cornejo J., Roselló S., Valcárcel M., Serrano E., Beltrán J., Nuez F. Evaluation of genotype and environment effects on taste and aroma flavor components of spanish fresh tomato varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59:2440-2450.
13. Dondarini R. Storia e arte, Aspetti storici. Il pomodoro 2010, 19-45. Art Servizi Editoriali, Bologna. R. Angelini (Ed.).
14. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. Isolation of plants DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12:13-15.
15. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations El Cultivo protegido en clima mediterráneo. Estudio FAO producción y protección vegetal 2002, vol. 90. FAO, Rome.
16. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989, 5:164-166.
17. Fulton T.M., Bucheli P., Voirol E., López J., Pétiard V., Tanksley S.D. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavor, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica 2002, 127:163-177.
18. Garcia-Martinez S., Andreani L., Garcia-Gusano M., Geuna F., Ruiz J.J. Evaluation of amplified fragment length polymorphism and simple sequence repeats for tomato germplasm fingerprinting, utility for grouping closely related traditional cultivars. Genome 2006, 49:648-656.
19. Garcia-Martinez S., Corrado G., Ruiz J.J., Rao R. Diversity and structure of a sample of traditional Italian and Spanish tomato accessions. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60:789-798.
20. Grandillo S., Ku H.M., Tanksley S.D. Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999, 99:978-987.
21. Harlan J.R. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 1975, 188:618-621.
22. Hawkes J.G., Maxted N., Ford-Lloyd B.V. The Ex Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
23. He C., Poysa V., Yu K. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106:363-373.
24. IPGRI, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute Descriptors for Tomato (Lycopersicon spp.) 1997, IPGRI (Bioversity Int.), Rome.
25. Kiers H.A.L. Three-way Methods for the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Two-way Data 1989, DWSO Press, Leiden.
26. Krzanowski W.J. Principles of Multivariate Analysis, A User's Perspective 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Louette D. Traditional management of seed and genetic diversity: what is a landrace?. Genes in the Field: On-farm Conservation of Crop Diversity 2000, 109-142. Lewis Publishers, FL. S.B. Brush (Ed.).
28. Lippman Z., Tanksley S.D. Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom. Genetics 2001, 158:413-422.
29. Maxted N., Ford-Lloyd B.V., Hawkes J.G. Complementary conservation strategies. Plant Genetic Conservation: The In Situ Approach 1997, 5-39. Chapman and Hall, London. N. Maxted, B.V. Ford-Lloyd, J.G. Hawkes (Eds.).
30. Mazzucato A., Ficcadenti N., Caioni M., Mosconi P., Piccinini E., Reddy Sanampudi V.R., Sestili S., Ferrari V. Genetic diversity and distinctiveness in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. The Italian case study of 'A pera Abruzzese'. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 125:55-62.
31. Meerburg B.G., Korevaar H., Haubenhofer D.K., Blom-Zandstra M., Van Keulen H. The changing role of agriculture in Dutch society. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 147:511.
32. Negri V., Maxted N., Veteläinen M. European landrace conservation: an introduction. European Landraces: On-farm Conservation Management and Use, Biodiversity Technical Bulletin 15 2009, 1-22. Bioversity International, Macaresse. M. Veteläinen, V. Negri, N. Maxted (Eds.).
33. Park Y.H., West M.A.L., St.Clair D.A. Evaluation of AFLPs for germplasm fingerprinting and assessment of genetic diversity in cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Genome 2004, 47:510-518.
34. Pressoir G., Berthaud J. Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 2003, 92:88-94.
35. Rick C.M. The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Econ. Bot. 1958, 12:346-367.
36. Rick C.M., Fobes J.F. Allozyme variation in the cultivated tomato and closely related species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1975, 102:376-384.
37. Roselló S., Galiana-Balaguer L., Herrero-Martínez J.M., Maquieira A., Nuez F. Simultaneous quantification of the main organic acids and carbohydrates involved in tomato flavour using capillary zone electrophoresis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82:1101-1106.
38. Smouse P.E., Peakall R. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 1999, 82:561-573.
39. Stevens M.A. Relationships between components contributing to quality variation among tomato lines. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1972, 97:70-73.
40. Tanksley S.D. The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell Online 2004, 16:S181-S189.
41. Terzopoulos P.J., Bebeli P.J. DNA and morphological diversity of selected Greek tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116:354-361.
42. Terzopoulos P.J., Walters S.A., Bebeli P.J. Evaluation of Greek tomato landrace populations for heterogeneity of horticultural traits. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 74:24-29.
43. Terzopoulos P.J., Bebeli P.J. Phenotypic diversity in Greek tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 126:138-144.
44. Van Der Knaap E., Lippman Z.B., Tanksley S.D. Extremely elongated tomato fruit controlled by four quantitative trait loci with epistatic interactions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104:241-247.
45. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., Van De Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Pelman J., Kuiper M., Zabeau M. AFLP, A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23:4407-4414.
46. Villand J., Skroch P.W., Lai T., Hanson P., Kuo C.G., Nienhuis J. Genetic variation among tomato accessions from primary and secondary centers of diversity. Crop Sci. 1998, 38:1339-1347.
47. Williams C.E., St.Clair D.A. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 1993, 36:619-630.
48. Zeven A.C. Landraces, a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 1998, 104:117-139.
49. Zeven A.C. The traditional inexplicable replacement of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars, a review. Euphytica 1999, 110:181-191.