USMMC: A self-contained model checker for UML state machines

2013 9th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2013 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 623-626

  Liu, Shuang ^a   Liu, Yang ^b   Sun, Jun ^c   Zheng, Manchun ^c   Wadhwa, Bimlesh ^a   Dong, Jin Song ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Model checking; Semantics; UML state machines

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT COSTS; EVALUATION RESULTS; INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; MODEL CHECKER; MODEL DYNAMICS; OBJECT-ORIENTED SYSTEM; UML DIAGRAMS; UML STATE MACHINE;

MODEL CHECKING; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TOOLS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84883714795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2491411.2494595     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. OMG unified language superstructure specification (formal). Version 2.4.1, 2011-08-06. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Superstructure/PDF/.
2. M. E. Beato, M. Barrio-Solórzano, C. E. Cuesta, and P. de la Fuente. UML automatic verification tool with formal methods. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 127:3-16, 2005.
3. H. Fecher, J. Schönborn, M. Kyas, and W. de Roever. 29 new unclarities in the semantics of uml 2.0 state machines. In Formal Methods and Software Engineering. Springer, 2005.
4. S. Gnesi, D. Latella, and M. Massink. Model checking UML statechart diagrams using JACK. In HASE, 1999.
5. D. Harel and E. Gery. Executable object modeling with statecharts. IEEE Computer, 30:31-42, 1997.
6. A. Knapp and S. Merz. Model checking and code generation for UML state machines and collaborations. In Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Tools for System Design and Verification, Technical Report, 2002.
7. J. Kong, K. Zhang, J. Dong, and D. Xu. Specifying behavioral semantics of UML diagrams through graph transformations. Journal of Systems and Software, 82:292-306, 2009.
8. J. Lilius and I. P. Paltor. vUML: A tool for verifying UML models. In ASE, 1999.
9. S. Liu, Y. Liu, E. André, C. Choppy, J. Sun, B. Wadhwa, and J. S. Dong. A formal semantics for complete uml state machines with communications. In iFM, 2013.
10. B. Lundell, B. Lings, A. Persson, and A. Mattsson. UML model interchange in heterogeneous tool environments: An analysis of adoptions of XMI 2. In MODELS. Springer, 2006.
11. M. Petre. UML in practice. In ICSE, 2013.
12. W. Shen, K. Compton, and J. Huggins. A toolset for supporting UML static and dynamic model checking. In COMPSAC, 2002.
13. J. Sun, Y. Liu, J. S. Dong, and J. Pang. PAT: Towards flexible verification under fairness. In CAV, 2009.
14. T. Wang, S. Song, J. Sun, Y. Liu, J. S. Dong, X. Wang, and S. Li. More anti-chain based refinement checking. In ICFEM, 2012.
15. A. Zeichick. Modeling usage low; developers confused about uml 2.0, mda. Technical report, BZ Research, 2002.
16. S. Zhang and Y. Liu. An automatic approach to model checking UML state machines. In SSIRI-C, 2010.