Communication is the key to success in pragmatic clinical trials in practice-based research networks (PBRNs)

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 571-578

  Bertram, Susan ^a   Graham, Deborah ^b   Kurland, Marge ^a   Pace, Wilson ^b   Madison, Suzanne ^a   Yawn, Barbara P ^a  

^a OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Communication; Practice based research networks

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMFORT; COMPREHENSION; E-MAIL; EXPERIENCE; FAX; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE BASED RESEARCH NETWORK; PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIAL; TELEPHONE; TEXT MESSAGING; TIME;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNICATION; PRACTICE-BASED RESEARCH NETWORKS;

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; KANSAS; MINNESOTA; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84883708166     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120352     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Richardson B, Newman R. Clinical trial management-an integrated process. 2006. Available from: http://edp316745.wikispaces.com/file/view/Clinical-Trial- Planning-1.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2013.
2. Halloran L. Clinical study project plans. J Clin Res Best Pract 2010;6:1- 6.
3. Mahinda T. Back to basics developing an effective communication plan for clinical trial management. Monitor 2006:19-23.
4. Patsopoulos N. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011;12:217-24.
5. Godwin M, Ruhlan L, Casson I, et al. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:28.
6. Aspy C, Enright M, Halstead L, Mold JW; Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. Improving mammography screening using best practices and practice enhancement assistants: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:326-33.
7. Fagnan L, Dorr D, Davis M, et al. Turning on the care coordination switch in rural primary care: voices from the practices- clinician champions, clinician partners, administrators, and nurse care managers. J Ambul Care Manage 2011;34:304 -18.
8. Pace W, Fagnan L, West D. The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality(AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) relationship: delivering on a opportunity, challenges, and future directions. J Am board Fam Med 2011;24:489 -92.
9. Kroenke K, Kapoor W, Helfand M, Meltzer D, McDonald M, Selker H. Training and career development for comparative effectiveness research workforce development. Clin Transl Sci 2010;3:258-62.
10. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier J, et al CONSORT Group; Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare (Practihc) Group. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390.
11. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008;299:211-3.