Improving mammography screening using best practices and practice enhancement assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 326-333

  Aspy, Cheryl B ^a   Enright, Margaret ^b   Halstead, LaWanna ^b   Mold, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PHYSICIAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCREENING TEST; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OKLAHOMA; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 47749133800     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2002.
2. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet. 1999;353: 1903-8.
3. Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;(22):63-7.
4. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997; 80:2091-9.
5. Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE. Follow-up after 11 years-update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;45:263-70.
6. Shapiro S. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;(22):27-30.
7. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:625-51.
8. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Int Med 2002;137(5 Pt 1):347-60.
9. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-92.
10. Oklahoma State Department of Health. Female breast cancer in Oklahoma. Chronic Disease Service 2000;1:1-4.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004.
12. Belcher DW, Berg AO, Inui TS. Practical approaches to providing better preventive care: are physicians a problem or a solution? Am J Prev Med 1988;4(4 Suppl):27-48; discussion, 49-52.
13. Frame PS. Health maintenance in clinical practice: strategies and barriers. Am Fam Physician 1992;45: 1192-200.
14. Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making "time" for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68: 785-91.
15. Leininger LS, Finn L, Dickey L, et al. An office system for organizing preventive services: a report by the American Cancer Society Advisory Group on Preventive Health Care Reminder Systems. Arch Fam Med 1996;5:108-15.
16. Hahn D, Berger M. Implementation of a systematic health maintenance protocol in a private practice. J Fam Pract 1990;31:492-504.
17. Pommerenke F. Implementing preventive services: practical strategies for primary care physicians. Cancer Prev 1992;3:1-13.
18. McPhee S, Bird J, Fordham D, Rodnick J, Osborn E. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. JAMA 1991;266:538-44.
19. Gemson D, Ashford A, Dickey L, et al. Putting prevention into practice: impact of a multifaceted physician education program on preventive services in the inner city. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2210-6.
20. Dietrich A, O'Connor G, Keller A, Carney P, Levy D, Whaley F. Cancer: improving early detection and prevention: a community practice randomized trial. BMJ 1992;304:687-91.
21. Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:1-10.
22. Mold JW, Gregory M. Best practices research. Fam Med 2003;35:131-4.
23. Cotton A, Aspy CB, Mold J, Stein H. Clinical decision-making in blood pressure management of patients with diabetes mellitus: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:232-9.
24. Ferrell CW, Aspy CB, Mold JW. Management of prescription refills in primary care: an Oklahoma physicians Resources/Research Network (OKPRN) Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:31-8.
25. Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer. c1997-2008.Availablefrom:http: //www.randomizer. org/form.htm. Accessed 30 April 2008.
26. Deming WE. The new economics for industry, government, education, 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2000.
27. Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics. 1992;48:577-85.
28. Preston JA, Scinto JD, Grady JN, Schulz AF, Petrillo MK. The effect of a multifaceted physician office-based intervention on older women's mammography use. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:1-7.
29. Taylor V, Thompson B, Lessler D, Yasui Y, Montano D, Johnson KM. Strategies that improve mammography screening rates. JCOM 1999;6:21.