Beyond metatheory?

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 589-608

  Reus Smit, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

analytical eclecticism; epistemology; International Relations theory; metatheory; ontology; practical knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883634103     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066113495479     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anscombe GEMIntention. Oxford: Blackwell; 1963:.
2. Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Bobbs Merrill; 1962:.
3. Bates SR,Jenkins L.Teaching and learning ontology and epistemology in political science.Politics. 2007;27 (1): 55-63.
4. Barnett M,Finnemore MRules for the World: International Organizations in World Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2004:.
5. Beitz CRThe Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
6. Blaikie NApproaches to Social Inquiry: Advancing Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007:.
7. Booth KInternational Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Smith SBooth KZalewski M, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:328-340.
8. Buchanan A,Keohane RO.The preventive use of force: A cosmopolitan institutional proposal.Ethics and International Affairs. 2004;18 (1): 1-22.
9. Buchanan A,Keohane RO.The legitimacy of global governance institutions.Ethics and International Affairs. 2006;20 (4): 405-437.
10. Bull H.International theory: The case for a classical approach.World Politics. 1966;18 (3): 361-377.
11. Carr EHThe Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939. New York: Harper and Row; 1964:.
12. E.H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. Cox ME, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2004:.
13. Easton DThe Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1967:.
14. Engstrom S.Kant's distinction between theoretical and practical reason.Harvard Review of Philosophy. 2002;X:49-63.
15. Friedrichs J,Kratochwil F.On acting and knowing: How pragmatism can advance International Relations research and methodology.International Organization. 2009;63 (4): 701-731.
16. Frost MEthics in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
17. Goodin RE,Tilly CThe Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Goodin RETilly C, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:3-34.
18. Griffin JOn Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
19. Halliday F.International Relations and its discontents.International Affairs. 1995;71 (4): 733-746.
20. Hay CThe Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Goodin RETilly C, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:78-96.
21. Hay C.Does ontology trump epistemology? Notes on the directional dependence of ontology and epistemology in political analysis.Politics. 2007;27 (2): 115-118.
22. Hollis MModels of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977:.
23. Holsti KJThe Art of the Feud: Reconceptualizing International Relations. Ciprut JV, ed. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2000:31-34.
24. Jones CE.H. Carr and International Relations: A Duty to Lie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
25. Kang DCChina Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press; 2007:.
26. Katzenstein PJThe Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1996:.
27. Katzenstein PJ.'Walls' between 'those people'? Contending perspectives on world politics.Perspectives on Politics. 2010;8 (1): 11-25.
28. Katzenstein PJ,Sil RThe Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Reus-Smit CSnidal D, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:109-130.
29. Keohane RO.Governance in a partially globalized world.American Political Science Review. 2001;95 (1): 1-13.
30. Kuhn TSThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
31. Lake DA.Why 'isms' are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress.International Studies Quarterly. 2011;55 (2): 465-480.
32. Linklater A.The question of the next stage in International Relations theory: A critical-theoretical point of view.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1992;21 (1): 77-98.
33. Little R.The English School's contribution to the study of International Relations.European Journal of International Relations. 2000;6 (3): 395-422.
34. Marsh D,Stoker GTheory and Methods in Political Science. Marsh DStoker G, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002:1-16.
35. Moravcsik A.Theory synthesis in International Relations: Real not metaphysical.International Studies Review. 2003;5 (1): 131-136.
36. Price RMMoral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
37. Seabrooke LThe Social Sources of Financial Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2006:.
38. Sil R.The division of labor in social science research: Unified methodology or 'organic solidarity'?.Polity. 2000a;32 (4): 499-531.
39. Sil R.The foundations of eclecticism: The epistemological status of agency, culture, and structure in social theory.Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2000b;12 (3): 353-387.
40. Sil RManaging Modernity: Work, Community, and Authority in Late-Industrializing Japan and Russia. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2002:.
41. Sil R,Katzenstein PJ.Analytical eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions.Perspectives on Politics. 2010a;8 (2): 411-431.
42. Sil R,Katzenstein PJBeyond Paradigms: Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. London: Palgrave; 2010b:.
43. Sil R,Katzenstein PJ.De-centering, not discarding the 'isms': Some friendly amendments.International Studies Quarterly. 2011;55 (2): 481-485.
44. Suh JJ,Katzenstein PJ,Carlson ARethinking Asian Security: Identity, Power, and Efficiency. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2004:.
45. Taylor CPhilosophy and the Human Sciences. Taylor C, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985:15-57.
46. Wallace W.Truth and power, monks and technocrats: Theory and practice in International Relations.Review of International Studies. 2003;22 (3): 301-321.
47. Wendt ASocial Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.